Cargando…
Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies?
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with increased incidence of ovarian (OC), cervical (CC) and endometrium cancer (EC). However, the impact of body composition (BC) on overall survival (OS), especially of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is not yet understood. METHODS: In 189 women with gynecological...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662648 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24667 |
_version_ | 1783313280701300736 |
---|---|
author | Nattenmüller, Johanna Rom, Joachim Buckner, Tom Arvin, Jalal Bau, Benedikt Sohn, Christof Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Schott, Sarah |
author_facet | Nattenmüller, Johanna Rom, Joachim Buckner, Tom Arvin, Jalal Bau, Benedikt Sohn, Christof Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Schott, Sarah |
author_sort | Nattenmüller, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with increased incidence of ovarian (OC), cervical (CC) and endometrium cancer (EC). However, the impact of body composition (BC) on overall survival (OS), especially of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is not yet understood. METHODS: In 189 women with gynecological malignancies (31 OC, 104 CC, 54 EC, mean age 62.9y; mean BMI 26.8 kg/m(2); median follow-up 30.7months) with routine staging CT-scans at baseline (mean interval: 4.3 months), densitometric quantification of total (TAT), visceral, and subcutaneous-fat-area (SAT), inter-muscular-fat-area (IMFA), and skeletal-muscle-index (SMI) was performed to analyze the impact of BC on survival. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 30.7 months 48 patients had died. We observed no significant differences regarding BMI, the adipose- and muscle-distribution between surviving and deceased women. Univariate analyses revealed no significant BC-parameter with impact on OS, which was confirmed by different multivariate models. A subgroup analysis of OC, CC and EC showed only a protective impact of SMI on survival in the subgroup of CC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased incidence of gynecological malignancies in obese, we found no significant impact of BC including VAT on patient survival. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to quantify BC and its metabolomic impact regarding treatment and prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5893243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58932432018-04-16 Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? Nattenmüller, Johanna Rom, Joachim Buckner, Tom Arvin, Jalal Bau, Benedikt Sohn, Christof Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Schott, Sarah Oncotarget Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with increased incidence of ovarian (OC), cervical (CC) and endometrium cancer (EC). However, the impact of body composition (BC) on overall survival (OS), especially of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is not yet understood. METHODS: In 189 women with gynecological malignancies (31 OC, 104 CC, 54 EC, mean age 62.9y; mean BMI 26.8 kg/m(2); median follow-up 30.7months) with routine staging CT-scans at baseline (mean interval: 4.3 months), densitometric quantification of total (TAT), visceral, and subcutaneous-fat-area (SAT), inter-muscular-fat-area (IMFA), and skeletal-muscle-index (SMI) was performed to analyze the impact of BC on survival. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 30.7 months 48 patients had died. We observed no significant differences regarding BMI, the adipose- and muscle-distribution between surviving and deceased women. Univariate analyses revealed no significant BC-parameter with impact on OS, which was confirmed by different multivariate models. A subgroup analysis of OC, CC and EC showed only a protective impact of SMI on survival in the subgroup of CC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased incidence of gynecological malignancies in obese, we found no significant impact of BC including VAT on patient survival. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to quantify BC and its metabolomic impact regarding treatment and prognosis. Impact Journals LLC 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5893243/ /pubmed/29662648 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24667 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Nattenmüller et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Nattenmüller, Johanna Rom, Joachim Buckner, Tom Arvin, Jalal Bau, Benedikt Sohn, Christof Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Schott, Sarah Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title | Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title_full | Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title_fullStr | Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title_full_unstemmed | Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title_short | Visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
title_sort | visceral abdominal fat measured by computer tomography as a prognostic factor for gynecological malignancies? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662648 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nattenmullerjohanna visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT romjoachim visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT bucknertom visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT arvinjalal visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT baubenedikt visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT sohnchristof visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT kauczorhansulrich visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies AT schottsarah visceralabdominalfatmeasuredbycomputertomographyasaprognosticfactorforgynecologicalmalignancies |