Cargando…

Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aims to determine the impact of PET/CT on radiotherapy planning and outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: All patients underwent PET/CT scanning in the radiotherapy treatment position, and received treatment planned using the PET/CT dataset. GTV wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Sweet Ping, Tan, Jennifer, Osbourne, Glen, Williams, Luke, Bressel, Mathias A.B., Hicks, Rodney J., Lau, Eddie W.F., Chu, Julie, Ngan, Samuel Y.K., Leong, Trevor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.01.008
_version_ 1783313314329133056
author Ng, Sweet Ping
Tan, Jennifer
Osbourne, Glen
Williams, Luke
Bressel, Mathias A.B.
Hicks, Rodney J.
Lau, Eddie W.F.
Chu, Julie
Ngan, Samuel Y.K.
Leong, Trevor
author_facet Ng, Sweet Ping
Tan, Jennifer
Osbourne, Glen
Williams, Luke
Bressel, Mathias A.B.
Hicks, Rodney J.
Lau, Eddie W.F.
Chu, Julie
Ngan, Samuel Y.K.
Leong, Trevor
author_sort Ng, Sweet Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This prospective study aims to determine the impact of PET/CT on radiotherapy planning and outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: All patients underwent PET/CT scanning in the radiotherapy treatment position, and received treatment planned using the PET/CT dataset. GTV was defined separately on PET/CT (GTV-PET) and CT (GTV-CT) datasets. A corresponding PTV was generated for each patient. Volumetric and spatial analysis quantified the proportion of FDG-avid disease not included in CT-based volumes. Clinical data was collected to determine locoregional control and overall survival rates. RESULTS: 13 (24.1%) of 57 accrued patients had metastatic disease detected on PET. Median follow up was 4 years. FDG-avid disease would have been excluded from GTV-CT in 29 of 38 patients (76%). In 5 patients, FDG-avid disease would have been completely excluded from the PTV-CT. GTV-CT underestimated the cranial and caudal extent of FDG-avid tumour in 14 (36%) and 10 (26%) patients. 4-Year overall survival and locoregional failure free survival were 37% and 65%. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT altered the delineation of tumour volumes when compared to CT alone, and should be considered standard for treatment planning. Although clinical outcomes were not improved with PET/CT planning, it did allow the use of smaller radiotherapy volumes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5893524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58935242018-04-13 Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer Ng, Sweet Ping Tan, Jennifer Osbourne, Glen Williams, Luke Bressel, Mathias A.B. Hicks, Rodney J. Lau, Eddie W.F. Chu, Julie Ngan, Samuel Y.K. Leong, Trevor Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND: This prospective study aims to determine the impact of PET/CT on radiotherapy planning and outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: All patients underwent PET/CT scanning in the radiotherapy treatment position, and received treatment planned using the PET/CT dataset. GTV was defined separately on PET/CT (GTV-PET) and CT (GTV-CT) datasets. A corresponding PTV was generated for each patient. Volumetric and spatial analysis quantified the proportion of FDG-avid disease not included in CT-based volumes. Clinical data was collected to determine locoregional control and overall survival rates. RESULTS: 13 (24.1%) of 57 accrued patients had metastatic disease detected on PET. Median follow up was 4 years. FDG-avid disease would have been excluded from GTV-CT in 29 of 38 patients (76%). In 5 patients, FDG-avid disease would have been completely excluded from the PTV-CT. GTV-CT underestimated the cranial and caudal extent of FDG-avid tumour in 14 (36%) and 10 (26%) patients. 4-Year overall survival and locoregional failure free survival were 37% and 65%. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT altered the delineation of tumour volumes when compared to CT alone, and should be considered standard for treatment planning. Although clinical outcomes were not improved with PET/CT planning, it did allow the use of smaller radiotherapy volumes. Elsevier 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5893524/ /pubmed/29658005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.01.008 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ng, Sweet Ping
Tan, Jennifer
Osbourne, Glen
Williams, Luke
Bressel, Mathias A.B.
Hicks, Rodney J.
Lau, Eddie W.F.
Chu, Julie
Ngan, Samuel Y.K.
Leong, Trevor
Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title_full Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title_fullStr Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title_short Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
title_sort follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of fdg-pet on ct-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.01.008
work_keys_str_mv AT ngsweetping followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT tanjennifer followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT osbourneglen followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT williamsluke followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT bresselmathiasab followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT hicksrodneyj followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT laueddiewf followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT chujulie followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT ngansamuelyk followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer
AT leongtrevor followupresultsofaprospectivestudytoevaluatetheimpactoffdgpetonctbasedradiotherapytreatmentplanningforoesophagealcancer