Cargando…
The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4 |
_version_ | 1783313347074064384 |
---|---|
author | Boone, N. W. Liu, L. Romberg-Camps, M. J. Duijsens, L. Houwen, C. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Janknegt, R. Peeters, R. Landewé, R. B. M. Winkens, B. van Bodegraven, A. A. |
author_facet | Boone, N. W. Liu, L. Romberg-Camps, M. J. Duijsens, L. Houwen, C. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Janknegt, R. Peeters, R. Landewé, R. B. M. Winkens, B. van Bodegraven, A. A. |
author_sort | Boone, N. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar approval by the European Medicines Agency. The principle of “first do no harm” may be challenged in a patient when switching from originator to biosimilar biological. AIM: To describe the 1-year results of a pragmatic study on infliximab biosimilar implementation in immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients on the basis of shared decision-making under effectiveness and safety monitoring. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatology patients on infliximab originator were converted to infliximab biosimilar after providing informed consent. Nocebo response patients were monitored after switch back to originator. Linear mixed models were used to analyze continuous endpoints on effectiveness and laboratory outcomes to determine significance (P ≤ 0.05) of change over time after switching. RESULTS: After inviting 146 patients, a group of 125 patients enrolled in the project over time, respectively, 73 Crohn’s disease, 28 ulcerative colitis, nine rheumatoid arthritis, ten psoriatic arthritis, and five ankylosing spondylitis patients. No statistically significant changes in effectiveness and safety were observed in any of the indications after a median of 4 infusions in 9 months of study. An overall nocebo response of 12.8% was found among the patients during a minimal observation period of 6 months after the transition to biosimilar infliximab. The overall nocebo response rate did not differ between the studied indications. CONCLUSIONS: In inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatological patients, similar effectiveness and safety were demonstrated on the transition into infliximab biosimilar. In our series, patient empowerment and registration of treatment outcomes delineated biosimilar transition, an approach that hypothetically could reduce nocebo response rates which are relevant to account for regarding biosimilar implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5893662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58936622018-04-16 The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice Boone, N. W. Liu, L. Romberg-Camps, M. J. Duijsens, L. Houwen, C. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Janknegt, R. Peeters, R. Landewé, R. B. M. Winkens, B. van Bodegraven, A. A. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar approval by the European Medicines Agency. The principle of “first do no harm” may be challenged in a patient when switching from originator to biosimilar biological. AIM: To describe the 1-year results of a pragmatic study on infliximab biosimilar implementation in immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients on the basis of shared decision-making under effectiveness and safety monitoring. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatology patients on infliximab originator were converted to infliximab biosimilar after providing informed consent. Nocebo response patients were monitored after switch back to originator. Linear mixed models were used to analyze continuous endpoints on effectiveness and laboratory outcomes to determine significance (P ≤ 0.05) of change over time after switching. RESULTS: After inviting 146 patients, a group of 125 patients enrolled in the project over time, respectively, 73 Crohn’s disease, 28 ulcerative colitis, nine rheumatoid arthritis, ten psoriatic arthritis, and five ankylosing spondylitis patients. No statistically significant changes in effectiveness and safety were observed in any of the indications after a median of 4 infusions in 9 months of study. An overall nocebo response of 12.8% was found among the patients during a minimal observation period of 6 months after the transition to biosimilar infliximab. The overall nocebo response rate did not differ between the studied indications. CONCLUSIONS: In inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatological patients, similar effectiveness and safety were demonstrated on the transition into infliximab biosimilar. In our series, patient empowerment and registration of treatment outcomes delineated biosimilar transition, an approach that hypothetically could reduce nocebo response rates which are relevant to account for regarding biosimilar implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-01-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5893662/ /pubmed/29368188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Boone, N. W. Liu, L. Romberg-Camps, M. J. Duijsens, L. Houwen, C. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Janknegt, R. Peeters, R. Landewé, R. B. M. Winkens, B. van Bodegraven, A. A. The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title | The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title_full | The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title_fullStr | The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title_full_unstemmed | The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title_short | The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
title_sort | nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boonenw thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT liul thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT rombergcampsmj thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT duijsensl thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT houwenc thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT vanderkuyphm thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT janknegtr thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT peetersr thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT landewerbm thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT winkensb thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT vanbodegravenaa thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT boonenw noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT liul noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT rombergcampsmj noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT duijsensl noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT houwenc noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT vanderkuyphm noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT janknegtr noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT peetersr noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT landewerbm noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT winkensb noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice AT vanbodegravenaa noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice |