Cargando…

The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boone, N. W., Liu, L., Romberg-Camps, M. J., Duijsens, L., Houwen, C., van der Kuy, P. H. M., Janknegt, R., Peeters, R., Landewé, R. B. M., Winkens, B., van Bodegraven, A. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4
_version_ 1783313347074064384
author Boone, N. W.
Liu, L.
Romberg-Camps, M. J.
Duijsens, L.
Houwen, C.
van der Kuy, P. H. M.
Janknegt, R.
Peeters, R.
Landewé, R. B. M.
Winkens, B.
van Bodegraven, A. A.
author_facet Boone, N. W.
Liu, L.
Romberg-Camps, M. J.
Duijsens, L.
Houwen, C.
van der Kuy, P. H. M.
Janknegt, R.
Peeters, R.
Landewé, R. B. M.
Winkens, B.
van Bodegraven, A. A.
author_sort Boone, N. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar approval by the European Medicines Agency. The principle of “first do no harm” may be challenged in a patient when switching from originator to biosimilar biological. AIM: To describe the 1-year results of a pragmatic study on infliximab biosimilar implementation in immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients on the basis of shared decision-making under effectiveness and safety monitoring. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatology patients on infliximab originator were converted to infliximab biosimilar after providing informed consent. Nocebo response patients were monitored after switch back to originator. Linear mixed models were used to analyze continuous endpoints on effectiveness and laboratory outcomes to determine significance (P ≤ 0.05) of change over time after switching. RESULTS: After inviting 146 patients, a group of 125 patients enrolled in the project over time, respectively, 73 Crohn’s disease, 28 ulcerative colitis, nine rheumatoid arthritis, ten psoriatic arthritis, and five ankylosing spondylitis patients. No statistically significant changes in effectiveness and safety were observed in any of the indications after a median of 4 infusions in 9 months of study. An overall nocebo response of 12.8% was found among the patients during a minimal observation period of 6 months after the transition to biosimilar infliximab. The overall nocebo response rate did not differ between the studied indications. CONCLUSIONS: In inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatological patients, similar effectiveness and safety were demonstrated on the transition into infliximab biosimilar. In our series, patient empowerment and registration of treatment outcomes delineated biosimilar transition, an approach that hypothetically could reduce nocebo response rates which are relevant to account for regarding biosimilar implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5893662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58936622018-04-16 The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice Boone, N. W. Liu, L. Romberg-Camps, M. J. Duijsens, L. Houwen, C. van der Kuy, P. H. M. Janknegt, R. Peeters, R. Landewé, R. B. M. Winkens, B. van Bodegraven, A. A. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, non-medical switching of biological medication may provoke nocebo effects due to unexplained deterioration of therapeutic benefits. Indication extrapolation, idiosyncratic reactions, and interchangeability remain challenged in clinical practice after biosimilar approval by the European Medicines Agency. The principle of “first do no harm” may be challenged in a patient when switching from originator to biosimilar biological. AIM: To describe the 1-year results of a pragmatic study on infliximab biosimilar implementation in immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients on the basis of shared decision-making under effectiveness and safety monitoring. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatology patients on infliximab originator were converted to infliximab biosimilar after providing informed consent. Nocebo response patients were monitored after switch back to originator. Linear mixed models were used to analyze continuous endpoints on effectiveness and laboratory outcomes to determine significance (P ≤ 0.05) of change over time after switching. RESULTS: After inviting 146 patients, a group of 125 patients enrolled in the project over time, respectively, 73 Crohn’s disease, 28 ulcerative colitis, nine rheumatoid arthritis, ten psoriatic arthritis, and five ankylosing spondylitis patients. No statistically significant changes in effectiveness and safety were observed in any of the indications after a median of 4 infusions in 9 months of study. An overall nocebo response of 12.8% was found among the patients during a minimal observation period of 6 months after the transition to biosimilar infliximab. The overall nocebo response rate did not differ between the studied indications. CONCLUSIONS: In inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatological patients, similar effectiveness and safety were demonstrated on the transition into infliximab biosimilar. In our series, patient empowerment and registration of treatment outcomes delineated biosimilar transition, an approach that hypothetically could reduce nocebo response rates which are relevant to account for regarding biosimilar implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-01-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5893662/ /pubmed/29368188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
Boone, N. W.
Liu, L.
Romberg-Camps, M. J.
Duijsens, L.
Houwen, C.
van der Kuy, P. H. M.
Janknegt, R.
Peeters, R.
Landewé, R. B. M.
Winkens, B.
van Bodegraven, A. A.
The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title_full The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title_fullStr The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title_full_unstemmed The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title_short The nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
title_sort nocebo effect challenges the non-medical infliximab switch in practice
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2418-4
work_keys_str_mv AT boonenw thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT liul thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT rombergcampsmj thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT duijsensl thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT houwenc thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT vanderkuyphm thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT janknegtr thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT peetersr thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT landewerbm thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT winkensb thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT vanbodegravenaa thenoceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT boonenw noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT liul noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT rombergcampsmj noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT duijsensl noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT houwenc noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT vanderkuyphm noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT janknegtr noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT peetersr noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT landewerbm noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT winkensb noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice
AT vanbodegravenaa noceboeffectchallengesthenonmedicalinfliximabswitchinpractice