Cargando…

The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium

PURPOSE: The purpose of this international survey is to ascertain the current practice of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) by Otolaryngologists in the United Kingdom and Belgium. We compare the results with recommendations from the European Posit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veer, Vik, Zhang, Henry, Beyers, Jolien, Vanderveken, Olivier, Kotecha, Bhik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4939-y
_version_ 1783313363253592064
author Veer, Vik
Zhang, Henry
Beyers, Jolien
Vanderveken, Olivier
Kotecha, Bhik
author_facet Veer, Vik
Zhang, Henry
Beyers, Jolien
Vanderveken, Olivier
Kotecha, Bhik
author_sort Veer, Vik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this international survey is to ascertain the current practice of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) by Otolaryngologists in the United Kingdom and Belgium. We compare the results with recommendations from the European Position Paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy. METHODS: An online questionnaire was circulated to Consultant Otolaryngologists, independent practitioners, and trainees across the two countries. Eleven questions were used in total. RESULTS: 181 responses from the UK and 117 responses from Belgium were received, mostly from consultants and independent practitioners. SDB was a common presentation to ENT practice, seen by over 90% of clinicians. The use of DISE varied greatly between the two countries (72.9% Belgium, 26.1% UK). 54.1% of Belgian respondents use DISE on over 50% of their patients, compared to only 32.4% of British clinicians. Attitudes of surgeons towards the diagnostic value of DISE varied; in Belgium, the majority (54%) gave a rating of 3 or more (1 = useless to 5 = essential), with no respondents giving a score of 0 (useless). In the UK only 16% of respondents felt DISE had useful clinical value, with 25 respondents deeming it ’useless’. The majority opt for DISE when non-surgical therapies fail (51.4% UK, 61.3% Belgium). The majority of participants do not use objective measures for depth of sedation (75.7% UK, 66.7% Belgium), with a marked variation on anaesthetic methods. 62.2% of UK clinicians do not use a classification system, whereas in Belgium the majority of clinicians (60.8%) use the VOTE grading system. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in Belgium were more favourable to using DISE than in the UK. Differences in its clinical effectiveness were apparent between the two countries. A consensus on patient selection, method of sedation and an effective classification system seemed to be lacking from both countries. Further education is required to raise awareness for the use of DISE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5893728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58937282018-04-16 The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium Veer, Vik Zhang, Henry Beyers, Jolien Vanderveken, Olivier Kotecha, Bhik Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Miscellaneous PURPOSE: The purpose of this international survey is to ascertain the current practice of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) by Otolaryngologists in the United Kingdom and Belgium. We compare the results with recommendations from the European Position Paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy. METHODS: An online questionnaire was circulated to Consultant Otolaryngologists, independent practitioners, and trainees across the two countries. Eleven questions were used in total. RESULTS: 181 responses from the UK and 117 responses from Belgium were received, mostly from consultants and independent practitioners. SDB was a common presentation to ENT practice, seen by over 90% of clinicians. The use of DISE varied greatly between the two countries (72.9% Belgium, 26.1% UK). 54.1% of Belgian respondents use DISE on over 50% of their patients, compared to only 32.4% of British clinicians. Attitudes of surgeons towards the diagnostic value of DISE varied; in Belgium, the majority (54%) gave a rating of 3 or more (1 = useless to 5 = essential), with no respondents giving a score of 0 (useless). In the UK only 16% of respondents felt DISE had useful clinical value, with 25 respondents deeming it ’useless’. The majority opt for DISE when non-surgical therapies fail (51.4% UK, 61.3% Belgium). The majority of participants do not use objective measures for depth of sedation (75.7% UK, 66.7% Belgium), with a marked variation on anaesthetic methods. 62.2% of UK clinicians do not use a classification system, whereas in Belgium the majority of clinicians (60.8%) use the VOTE grading system. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in Belgium were more favourable to using DISE than in the UK. Differences in its clinical effectiveness were apparent between the two countries. A consensus on patient selection, method of sedation and an effective classification system seemed to be lacking from both countries. Further education is required to raise awareness for the use of DISE. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-19 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5893728/ /pubmed/29556753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4939-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Miscellaneous
Veer, Vik
Zhang, Henry
Beyers, Jolien
Vanderveken, Olivier
Kotecha, Bhik
The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title_full The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title_fullStr The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title_full_unstemmed The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title_short The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium
title_sort use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in england and belgium
topic Miscellaneous
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4939-y
work_keys_str_mv AT veervik theuseofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT zhanghenry theuseofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT beyersjolien theuseofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT vandervekenolivier theuseofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT kotechabhik theuseofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT veervik useofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT zhanghenry useofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT beyersjolien useofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT vandervekenolivier useofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium
AT kotechabhik useofdruginducedsleependoscopyinenglandandbelgium