Cargando…
The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study
Objective: To determine whether changes in sensorimotor control resulting from speaking conditions that induce fluency in people who stutter (PWS) can be measured using electroencephalographic (EEG) mu rhythms in neurotypical speakers. Methods: Non-stuttering (NS) adults spoke in one control conditi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00126 |
_version_ | 1783313390524956672 |
---|---|
author | Kittilstved, Tiffani Reilly, Kevin J. Harkrider, Ashley W. Casenhiser, Devin Thornton, David Jenson, David E. Hedinger, Tricia Bowers, Andrew L. Saltuklaroglu, Tim |
author_facet | Kittilstved, Tiffani Reilly, Kevin J. Harkrider, Ashley W. Casenhiser, Devin Thornton, David Jenson, David E. Hedinger, Tricia Bowers, Andrew L. Saltuklaroglu, Tim |
author_sort | Kittilstved, Tiffani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To determine whether changes in sensorimotor control resulting from speaking conditions that induce fluency in people who stutter (PWS) can be measured using electroencephalographic (EEG) mu rhythms in neurotypical speakers. Methods: Non-stuttering (NS) adults spoke in one control condition (solo speaking) and four experimental conditions (choral speech, delayed auditory feedback (DAF), prolonged speech and pseudostuttering). Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to identify sensorimotor μ components from EEG recordings. Time-frequency analyses measured μ-alpha (8–13 Hz) and μ-beta (15–25 Hz) event-related synchronization (ERS) and desynchronization (ERD) during each speech condition. Results: 19/24 participants contributed μ components. Relative to the control condition, the choral and DAF conditions elicited increases in μ-alpha ERD in the right hemisphere. In the pseudostuttering condition, increases in μ-beta ERD were observed in the left hemisphere. No differences were present between the prolonged speech and control conditions. Conclusions: Differences observed in the experimental conditions are thought to reflect sensorimotor control changes. Increases in right hemisphere μ-alpha ERD likely reflect increased reliance on auditory information, including auditory feedback, during the choral and DAF conditions. In the left hemisphere, increases in μ-beta ERD during pseudostuttering may have resulted from the different movement characteristics of this task compared with the solo speaking task. Relationships to findings in stuttering are discussed. Significance: Changes in sensorimotor control related feedforward and feedback control in fluency-enhancing speech manipulations can be measured using time-frequency decompositions of EEG μ rhythms in neurotypical speakers. This quiet, non-invasive, and temporally sensitive technique may be applied to learn more about normal sensorimotor control and fluency enhancement in PWS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5893846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58938462018-04-18 The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study Kittilstved, Tiffani Reilly, Kevin J. Harkrider, Ashley W. Casenhiser, Devin Thornton, David Jenson, David E. Hedinger, Tricia Bowers, Andrew L. Saltuklaroglu, Tim Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: To determine whether changes in sensorimotor control resulting from speaking conditions that induce fluency in people who stutter (PWS) can be measured using electroencephalographic (EEG) mu rhythms in neurotypical speakers. Methods: Non-stuttering (NS) adults spoke in one control condition (solo speaking) and four experimental conditions (choral speech, delayed auditory feedback (DAF), prolonged speech and pseudostuttering). Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to identify sensorimotor μ components from EEG recordings. Time-frequency analyses measured μ-alpha (8–13 Hz) and μ-beta (15–25 Hz) event-related synchronization (ERS) and desynchronization (ERD) during each speech condition. Results: 19/24 participants contributed μ components. Relative to the control condition, the choral and DAF conditions elicited increases in μ-alpha ERD in the right hemisphere. In the pseudostuttering condition, increases in μ-beta ERD were observed in the left hemisphere. No differences were present between the prolonged speech and control conditions. Conclusions: Differences observed in the experimental conditions are thought to reflect sensorimotor control changes. Increases in right hemisphere μ-alpha ERD likely reflect increased reliance on auditory information, including auditory feedback, during the choral and DAF conditions. In the left hemisphere, increases in μ-beta ERD during pseudostuttering may have resulted from the different movement characteristics of this task compared with the solo speaking task. Relationships to findings in stuttering are discussed. Significance: Changes in sensorimotor control related feedforward and feedback control in fluency-enhancing speech manipulations can be measured using time-frequency decompositions of EEG μ rhythms in neurotypical speakers. This quiet, non-invasive, and temporally sensitive technique may be applied to learn more about normal sensorimotor control and fluency enhancement in PWS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5893846/ /pubmed/29670516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00126 Text en Copyright © 2018 Kittilstved, Reilly, Harkrider, Casenhiser, Thornton, Jenson, Hedinger, Bowers and Saltuklaroglu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kittilstved, Tiffani Reilly, Kevin J. Harkrider, Ashley W. Casenhiser, Devin Thornton, David Jenson, David E. Hedinger, Tricia Bowers, Andrew L. Saltuklaroglu, Tim The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title | The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title_full | The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title_short | The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study |
title_sort | effects of fluency enhancing conditions on sensorimotor control of speech in typically fluent speakers: an eeg mu rhythm study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5893846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kittilstvedtiffani theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT reillykevinj theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT harkriderashleyw theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT casenhiserdevin theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT thorntondavid theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT jensondavide theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT hedingertricia theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT bowersandrewl theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT saltuklaroglutim theeffectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT kittilstvedtiffani effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT reillykevinj effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT harkriderashleyw effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT casenhiserdevin effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT thorntondavid effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT jensondavide effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT hedingertricia effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT bowersandrewl effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy AT saltuklaroglutim effectsoffluencyenhancingconditionsonsensorimotorcontrolofspeechintypicallyfluentspeakersaneegmurhythmstudy |