Cargando…

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps and Maximum Intensity Projection for Characterization of Normal Structures and Lesions

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the oral and maxillofacial region, with a special focus on the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and maximum intensity projection (MIP) for characterization of normal structures and lesions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogura, Ichiro, Sasaki, Yoshihiko, Kameta, Ayako, Sue, Mikiko, Oda, Takaaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657621
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.902524
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the oral and maxillofacial region, with a special focus on the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and maximum intensity projection (MIP) for characterization of normal structures and lesions. MATERIAL/METHODS: Thirty-five patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial lesions were included in this prospective study. DWI was performed on a 1.5 T unit, with b factor of 0 and 800 s/mm(2); moreover, ADC maps were generated. ADC values were measured for normal structures, odontogenic infections, squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and hemangiomas. RESULTS: As regards the normal structures, the mean ADC value of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.65±0.60×10(–3) mm(2)/s) in the upper neck area was higher than that of the spinal cord (0.74±0.15×10(–3) mm(2)/s, P=0.000), lymph nodes (0.87±0.17×10(–3) mm(2)/s, P=0.000), and Waldeyer’s ring (0.92±0.29×10(–3) mm(2)/s, P=0.000). The mean ADC value of hemangiomas (1.52±0.31×10(–3) mm(2)/s) was higher than that of odontogenic infections (0.85±0.36×10(–3) mm(2)/s, P=0.034) and SCC (1.38±0.22×10(–3) mm(2)/s, P=0.840). Furthermore, MIP (DWI) showed the normal structures and lesions in the oral and maxillofacial region in an improved way. CONCLUSIONS: DWI, ADC maps, and MIP can be used to characterize and differentiate normal structures and lesions in the oral and maxillofacial region.