Cargando…

Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing

BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabiszewska, Ewa, Pasicz, Katarzyna, Grabska, Iwona, Skrzyński, Witold, Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta, Bulski, Wojciech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657644
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135
_version_ 1783313421007060992
author Fabiszewska, Ewa
Pasicz, Katarzyna
Grabska, Iwona
Skrzyński, Witold
Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Bulski, Wojciech
author_facet Fabiszewska, Ewa
Pasicz, Katarzyna
Grabska, Iwona
Skrzyński, Witold
Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Bulski, Wojciech
author_sort Fabiszewska, Ewa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/METHODS: An evaluation of image quality was carried out for 22 ultrasound scanners equipped with 46 transducers. The CIRS Phantom model 040GSE was used. A set of tests was established which could be carried out with the phantom, including: depth of penetration, dead zone, distance measurement accuracy, resolution, uniformity, and visibility of structures. RESULTS: While the dead zone was 0 mm for 89% of transducers, it was 3 mm for the oldest transducer. The distances measured agreed with the actual distances by 1 mm or less in most cases, with the largest difference of 2.6 mm. The resolution in the axial direction for linear transducers did not exceed 1 mm, but it reached even 5 mm for some of the convex and sector transducers, especially at higher depths and in the lateral direction. For 29% of transducers, some distortions of anechoic structures were observed. Artifacts were detected for several transducers. CONCLUSIONS: The results will serve as a baseline for future testing. Several cases of suboptimal image quality were identified along with differences in performance between similar transducers. The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5894034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58940342018-04-13 Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing Fabiszewska, Ewa Pasicz, Katarzyna Grabska, Iwona Skrzyński, Witold Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Bulski, Wojciech Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/METHODS: An evaluation of image quality was carried out for 22 ultrasound scanners equipped with 46 transducers. The CIRS Phantom model 040GSE was used. A set of tests was established which could be carried out with the phantom, including: depth of penetration, dead zone, distance measurement accuracy, resolution, uniformity, and visibility of structures. RESULTS: While the dead zone was 0 mm for 89% of transducers, it was 3 mm for the oldest transducer. The distances measured agreed with the actual distances by 1 mm or less in most cases, with the largest difference of 2.6 mm. The resolution in the axial direction for linear transducers did not exceed 1 mm, but it reached even 5 mm for some of the convex and sector transducers, especially at higher depths and in the lateral direction. For 29% of transducers, some distortions of anechoic structures were observed. Artifacts were detected for several transducers. CONCLUSIONS: The results will serve as a baseline for future testing. Several cases of suboptimal image quality were identified along with differences in performance between similar transducers. The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examination. Termedia Publishing House 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5894034/ /pubmed/29657644 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135 Text en Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fabiszewska, Ewa
Pasicz, Katarzyna
Grabska, Iwona
Skrzyński, Witold
Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Bulski, Wojciech
Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title_full Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title_fullStr Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title_short Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
title_sort evaluation of imaging parameters of ultrasound scanners: baseline for future testing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657644
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiszewskaewa evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting
AT pasiczkatarzyna evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting
AT grabskaiwona evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting
AT skrzynskiwitold evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting
AT slusarczykkacprzykwioletta evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting
AT bulskiwojciech evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting