Cargando…
Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing
BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657644 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135 |
_version_ | 1783313421007060992 |
---|---|
author | Fabiszewska, Ewa Pasicz, Katarzyna Grabska, Iwona Skrzyński, Witold Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Bulski, Wojciech |
author_facet | Fabiszewska, Ewa Pasicz, Katarzyna Grabska, Iwona Skrzyński, Witold Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Bulski, Wojciech |
author_sort | Fabiszewska, Ewa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/METHODS: An evaluation of image quality was carried out for 22 ultrasound scanners equipped with 46 transducers. The CIRS Phantom model 040GSE was used. A set of tests was established which could be carried out with the phantom, including: depth of penetration, dead zone, distance measurement accuracy, resolution, uniformity, and visibility of structures. RESULTS: While the dead zone was 0 mm for 89% of transducers, it was 3 mm for the oldest transducer. The distances measured agreed with the actual distances by 1 mm or less in most cases, with the largest difference of 2.6 mm. The resolution in the axial direction for linear transducers did not exceed 1 mm, but it reached even 5 mm for some of the convex and sector transducers, especially at higher depths and in the lateral direction. For 29% of transducers, some distortions of anechoic structures were observed. Artifacts were detected for several transducers. CONCLUSIONS: The results will serve as a baseline for future testing. Several cases of suboptimal image quality were identified along with differences in performance between similar transducers. The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5894034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58940342018-04-13 Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing Fabiszewska, Ewa Pasicz, Katarzyna Grabska, Iwona Skrzyński, Witold Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Bulski, Wojciech Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. MATERIAL/METHODS: An evaluation of image quality was carried out for 22 ultrasound scanners equipped with 46 transducers. The CIRS Phantom model 040GSE was used. A set of tests was established which could be carried out with the phantom, including: depth of penetration, dead zone, distance measurement accuracy, resolution, uniformity, and visibility of structures. RESULTS: While the dead zone was 0 mm for 89% of transducers, it was 3 mm for the oldest transducer. The distances measured agreed with the actual distances by 1 mm or less in most cases, with the largest difference of 2.6 mm. The resolution in the axial direction for linear transducers did not exceed 1 mm, but it reached even 5 mm for some of the convex and sector transducers, especially at higher depths and in the lateral direction. For 29% of transducers, some distortions of anechoic structures were observed. Artifacts were detected for several transducers. CONCLUSIONS: The results will serve as a baseline for future testing. Several cases of suboptimal image quality were identified along with differences in performance between similar transducers. The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examination. Termedia Publishing House 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5894034/ /pubmed/29657644 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135 Text en Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fabiszewska, Ewa Pasicz, Katarzyna Grabska, Iwona Skrzyński, Witold Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Bulski, Wojciech Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title | Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title_full | Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title_short | Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing |
title_sort | evaluation of imaging parameters of ultrasound scanners: baseline for future testing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657644 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabiszewskaewa evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting AT pasiczkatarzyna evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting AT grabskaiwona evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting AT skrzynskiwitold evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting AT slusarczykkacprzykwioletta evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting AT bulskiwojciech evaluationofimagingparametersofultrasoundscannersbaselineforfuturetesting |