Cargando…

Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists

BACKGROUND: The main causes of suicide and how suicide could and should be prevented are ongoing controversies in the scientific literature as well as in public media. In the bill on public health from 2008 (Prop 2007/08:110), the Swedish Parliament adopted an overarching “Vision Zero for Suicide” (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlsson, Petter, Helgesson, Gert, Titelman, David, Sjöstrand, Manne, Juth, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0265-6
_version_ 1783313455358410752
author Karlsson, Petter
Helgesson, Gert
Titelman, David
Sjöstrand, Manne
Juth, Niklas
author_facet Karlsson, Petter
Helgesson, Gert
Titelman, David
Sjöstrand, Manne
Juth, Niklas
author_sort Karlsson, Petter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main causes of suicide and how suicide could and should be prevented are ongoing controversies in the scientific literature as well as in public media. In the bill on public health from 2008 (Prop 2007/08:110), the Swedish Parliament adopted an overarching “Vision Zero for Suicide” (VZ) and nine strategies for suicide prevention. However, how the VZ should be interpreted in healthcare is unclear. The VZ has been criticized both from a philosophical perspective and against the background of clinical experience and alleged empirical claims regarding the consequences of regulating suicide prevention. This study is part of a larger research project in medical ethics with the overarching aim to explore whether the VZ is ethically justifiable. The aim is to enrich the normative discussion by investigating empirically how the VZ is perceived in healthcare. METHODS: Interviews based on a semi-structured interview guide were performed with 12 Swedish psychiatrists. The interviews were analysed with descriptive qualitative content analysis aiming for identifying perceptions of the Vision Zero for Suicide as well as arguments for and against it. RESULTS: Though most of the participants mentioned at least some potential benefit of the Vision Zero for Suicide, the overall impression was a predominant skepticism. Some participants focused on why they consider the VZ to be unachievable, while others focused more on its potential consequences and normative implications. CONCLUSIONS: The VZ was perceived to be impossible to realize, nonconstructive or potentially counterproductive, and undesirable because of potential conflicts with other values and interests of patients as well as the general public. There were also important notions of the VZ having negative consequences for the working conditions of psychiatrists in Sweden, in increasing their work-related anxiety and thwarting the patient-physician relationship. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0265-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5894210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58942102018-04-12 Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists Karlsson, Petter Helgesson, Gert Titelman, David Sjöstrand, Manne Juth, Niklas BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The main causes of suicide and how suicide could and should be prevented are ongoing controversies in the scientific literature as well as in public media. In the bill on public health from 2008 (Prop 2007/08:110), the Swedish Parliament adopted an overarching “Vision Zero for Suicide” (VZ) and nine strategies for suicide prevention. However, how the VZ should be interpreted in healthcare is unclear. The VZ has been criticized both from a philosophical perspective and against the background of clinical experience and alleged empirical claims regarding the consequences of regulating suicide prevention. This study is part of a larger research project in medical ethics with the overarching aim to explore whether the VZ is ethically justifiable. The aim is to enrich the normative discussion by investigating empirically how the VZ is perceived in healthcare. METHODS: Interviews based on a semi-structured interview guide were performed with 12 Swedish psychiatrists. The interviews were analysed with descriptive qualitative content analysis aiming for identifying perceptions of the Vision Zero for Suicide as well as arguments for and against it. RESULTS: Though most of the participants mentioned at least some potential benefit of the Vision Zero for Suicide, the overall impression was a predominant skepticism. Some participants focused on why they consider the VZ to be unachievable, while others focused more on its potential consequences and normative implications. CONCLUSIONS: The VZ was perceived to be impossible to realize, nonconstructive or potentially counterproductive, and undesirable because of potential conflicts with other values and interests of patients as well as the general public. There were also important notions of the VZ having negative consequences for the working conditions of psychiatrists in Sweden, in increasing their work-related anxiety and thwarting the patient-physician relationship. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0265-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5894210/ /pubmed/29636033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0265-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karlsson, Petter
Helgesson, Gert
Titelman, David
Sjöstrand, Manne
Juth, Niklas
Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title_full Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title_fullStr Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title_full_unstemmed Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title_short Skepticism towards the Swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
title_sort skepticism towards the swedish vision zero for suicide: interviews with 12 psychiatrists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0265-6
work_keys_str_mv AT karlssonpetter skepticismtowardstheswedishvisionzeroforsuicideinterviewswith12psychiatrists
AT helgessongert skepticismtowardstheswedishvisionzeroforsuicideinterviewswith12psychiatrists
AT titelmandavid skepticismtowardstheswedishvisionzeroforsuicideinterviewswith12psychiatrists
AT sjostrandmanne skepticismtowardstheswedishvisionzeroforsuicideinterviewswith12psychiatrists
AT juthniklas skepticismtowardstheswedishvisionzeroforsuicideinterviewswith12psychiatrists