Cargando…

Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?

During perceptual decisions the activity of sensory neurons covaries with choice, a covariation often quantified as “choice-probability”. Moreover, choices are influenced by a subject's previous choice (serial dependence) and neuronal activity often shows temporal correlations on long (seconds)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis, Macke, Jakob H., Nienborg, Hendrikje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-17.2018
_version_ 1783313590095183872
author Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis
Macke, Jakob H.
Nienborg, Hendrikje
author_facet Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis
Macke, Jakob H.
Nienborg, Hendrikje
author_sort Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis
collection PubMed
description During perceptual decisions the activity of sensory neurons covaries with choice, a covariation often quantified as “choice-probability”. Moreover, choices are influenced by a subject's previous choice (serial dependence) and neuronal activity often shows temporal correlations on long (seconds) timescales. Here, we test whether these findings are linked. Using generalized linear models, we analyze simultaneous measurements of behavior and V2 neural activity in macaques performing a visual discrimination task. Both, decisions and spiking activity show substantial temporal correlations and cross-correlations but seem to reflect two mostly separate processes. Indeed, removing history effects using semipartial correlation analysis leaves choice probabilities largely unchanged. The serial dependencies in choices and neural activity therefore cannot explain the observed choice probability. Rather, serial dependencies in choices and spiking activity reflect two predominantly separate but parallel processes, which are coupled on each trial by covariations between choices and activity. These findings provide important constraints for computational models of perceptual decision-making that include feedback signals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Correlations, unexplained by the sensory input, between the activity of sensory neurons and an animal's perceptual choice (“choice probabilities”) have received attention from both a systems and computational neuroscience perspective. Conversely, whereas temporal correlations for both spiking activity (“non-stationarities”) and for a subject's choices in perceptual tasks (“serial dependencies”) have long been established, they have typically been ignored when measuring choice probabilities. Some accounts of choice probabilities incorporating feedback predict that these observations are linked. Here, we explore the extent to which this is the case. We find that, contrasting with these predictions, choice probabilities are largely independent of serial dependencies, which adds new constraints to accounts of choice probabilities that include feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58950392018-04-19 Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities? Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis Macke, Jakob H. Nienborg, Hendrikje J Neurosci Research Articles During perceptual decisions the activity of sensory neurons covaries with choice, a covariation often quantified as “choice-probability”. Moreover, choices are influenced by a subject's previous choice (serial dependence) and neuronal activity often shows temporal correlations on long (seconds) timescales. Here, we test whether these findings are linked. Using generalized linear models, we analyze simultaneous measurements of behavior and V2 neural activity in macaques performing a visual discrimination task. Both, decisions and spiking activity show substantial temporal correlations and cross-correlations but seem to reflect two mostly separate processes. Indeed, removing history effects using semipartial correlation analysis leaves choice probabilities largely unchanged. The serial dependencies in choices and neural activity therefore cannot explain the observed choice probability. Rather, serial dependencies in choices and spiking activity reflect two predominantly separate but parallel processes, which are coupled on each trial by covariations between choices and activity. These findings provide important constraints for computational models of perceptual decision-making that include feedback signals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Correlations, unexplained by the sensory input, between the activity of sensory neurons and an animal's perceptual choice (“choice probabilities”) have received attention from both a systems and computational neuroscience perspective. Conversely, whereas temporal correlations for both spiking activity (“non-stationarities”) and for a subject's choices in perceptual tasks (“serial dependencies”) have long been established, they have typically been ignored when measuring choice probabilities. Some accounts of choice probabilities incorporating feedback predict that these observations are linked. Here, we explore the extent to which this is the case. We find that, contrasting with these predictions, choice probabilities are largely independent of serial dependencies, which adds new constraints to accounts of choice probabilities that include feedback. Society for Neuroscience 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5895039/ /pubmed/29440531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-17.2018 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lueckmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Lueckmann, Jan-Matthis
Macke, Jakob H.
Nienborg, Hendrikje
Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title_full Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title_fullStr Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title_full_unstemmed Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title_short Can Serial Dependencies in Choices and Neural Activity Explain Choice Probabilities?
title_sort can serial dependencies in choices and neural activity explain choice probabilities?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-17.2018
work_keys_str_mv AT lueckmannjanmatthis canserialdependenciesinchoicesandneuralactivityexplainchoiceprobabilities
AT mackejakobh canserialdependenciesinchoicesandneuralactivityexplainchoiceprobabilities
AT nienborghendrikje canserialdependenciesinchoicesandneuralactivityexplainchoiceprobabilities