Cargando…

Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)

BACKGROUND—: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel diagnostic modality for functional testing of coronary artery stenosis without the use of pressure wires and induction of hyperemia. QFR is based on computation of standard invasive coronary angiographic imaging. The purpose of WIFI II (Wire-Free...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westra, Jelmer, Tu, Shengxian, Winther, Simon, Nissen, Louise, Vestergaard, Mai-Britt, Andersen, Birgitte Krogsgaard, Holck, Emil Nielsen, Fox Maule, Camilla, Johansen, Jane Kirk, Andreasen, Lene Nyhus, Simonsen, Jo Krogsgaard, Zhang, Yimin, Kristensen, Steen Dalby, Maeng, Michael, Kaltoft, Anne, Terkelsen, Christian Juhl, Krusell, Lars Romer, Jakobsen, Lars, Reiber, Johan H.C., Lassen, Jens Flensted, Bøttcher, Morten, Bøtker, Hans Erik, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Holm, Niels Ramsing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29555835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107
_version_ 1783313602853208064
author Westra, Jelmer
Tu, Shengxian
Winther, Simon
Nissen, Louise
Vestergaard, Mai-Britt
Andersen, Birgitte Krogsgaard
Holck, Emil Nielsen
Fox Maule, Camilla
Johansen, Jane Kirk
Andreasen, Lene Nyhus
Simonsen, Jo Krogsgaard
Zhang, Yimin
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Maeng, Michael
Kaltoft, Anne
Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
Krusell, Lars Romer
Jakobsen, Lars
Reiber, Johan H.C.
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Bøttcher, Morten
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Christiansen, Evald Høj
Holm, Niels Ramsing
author_facet Westra, Jelmer
Tu, Shengxian
Winther, Simon
Nissen, Louise
Vestergaard, Mai-Britt
Andersen, Birgitte Krogsgaard
Holck, Emil Nielsen
Fox Maule, Camilla
Johansen, Jane Kirk
Andreasen, Lene Nyhus
Simonsen, Jo Krogsgaard
Zhang, Yimin
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Maeng, Michael
Kaltoft, Anne
Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
Krusell, Lars Romer
Jakobsen, Lars
Reiber, Johan H.C.
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Bøttcher, Morten
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Christiansen, Evald Høj
Holm, Niels Ramsing
author_sort Westra, Jelmer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel diagnostic modality for functional testing of coronary artery stenosis without the use of pressure wires and induction of hyperemia. QFR is based on computation of standard invasive coronary angiographic imaging. The purpose of WIFI II (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II) was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of QFR in unselected consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS—: WIFI II was a predefined substudy to the Dan-NICAD study (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease), referring 362 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomographic angiography for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured in all segments with 30% to 90% diameter stenosis. Blinded observers calculated QFR (Medis Medical Imaging bv, The Netherlands) for comparison with FFR. FFR was measured in 292 lesions from 191 patients. Ten (5%) and 9 patients (5%) were excluded because of FFR and angiographic core laboratory criteria, respectively. QFR was successfully computed in 240 out of 255 lesions (94%) with a mean diameter stenosis of 50±12%. Mean difference between FFR and QFR was 0.01±0.08. QFR correctly classified 83% of the lesions using FFR with cutoff at 0.80 as reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.91) with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 77%, 86%, 75%, and 87%, respectively. A QFR–FFR hybrid approach based on the present results enables wire-free and adenosine-free procedures in 68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS—: Functional lesion evaluation by QFR assessment showed good agreement and diagnostic accuracy compared with FFR. Studies comparing clinical outcome after QFR- and FFR-based diagnostic strategies are required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02264717.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58951312018-04-27 Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II) Westra, Jelmer Tu, Shengxian Winther, Simon Nissen, Louise Vestergaard, Mai-Britt Andersen, Birgitte Krogsgaard Holck, Emil Nielsen Fox Maule, Camilla Johansen, Jane Kirk Andreasen, Lene Nyhus Simonsen, Jo Krogsgaard Zhang, Yimin Kristensen, Steen Dalby Maeng, Michael Kaltoft, Anne Terkelsen, Christian Juhl Krusell, Lars Romer Jakobsen, Lars Reiber, Johan H.C. Lassen, Jens Flensted Bøttcher, Morten Bøtker, Hans Erik Christiansen, Evald Høj Holm, Niels Ramsing Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Original Articles BACKGROUND—: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel diagnostic modality for functional testing of coronary artery stenosis without the use of pressure wires and induction of hyperemia. QFR is based on computation of standard invasive coronary angiographic imaging. The purpose of WIFI II (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II) was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of QFR in unselected consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS—: WIFI II was a predefined substudy to the Dan-NICAD study (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease), referring 362 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomographic angiography for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured in all segments with 30% to 90% diameter stenosis. Blinded observers calculated QFR (Medis Medical Imaging bv, The Netherlands) for comparison with FFR. FFR was measured in 292 lesions from 191 patients. Ten (5%) and 9 patients (5%) were excluded because of FFR and angiographic core laboratory criteria, respectively. QFR was successfully computed in 240 out of 255 lesions (94%) with a mean diameter stenosis of 50±12%. Mean difference between FFR and QFR was 0.01±0.08. QFR correctly classified 83% of the lesions using FFR with cutoff at 0.80 as reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.91) with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 77%, 86%, 75%, and 87%, respectively. A QFR–FFR hybrid approach based on the present results enables wire-free and adenosine-free procedures in 68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS—: Functional lesion evaluation by QFR assessment showed good agreement and diagnostic accuracy compared with FFR. Studies comparing clinical outcome after QFR- and FFR-based diagnostic strategies are required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02264717. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-03 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5895131/ /pubmed/29555835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Westra, Jelmer
Tu, Shengxian
Winther, Simon
Nissen, Louise
Vestergaard, Mai-Britt
Andersen, Birgitte Krogsgaard
Holck, Emil Nielsen
Fox Maule, Camilla
Johansen, Jane Kirk
Andreasen, Lene Nyhus
Simonsen, Jo Krogsgaard
Zhang, Yimin
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Maeng, Michael
Kaltoft, Anne
Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
Krusell, Lars Romer
Jakobsen, Lars
Reiber, Johan H.C.
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Bøttcher, Morten
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Christiansen, Evald Høj
Holm, Niels Ramsing
Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title_full Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title_fullStr Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title_short Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)
title_sort evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography: the wifi ii study (wire-free functional imaging ii)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29555835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107
work_keys_str_mv AT westrajelmer evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT tushengxian evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT winthersimon evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT nissenlouise evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT vestergaardmaibritt evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT andersenbirgittekrogsgaard evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT holckemilnielsen evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT foxmaulecamilla evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT johansenjanekirk evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT andreasenlenenyhus evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT simonsenjokrogsgaard evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT zhangyimin evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT kristensensteendalby evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT maengmichael evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT kaltoftanne evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT terkelsenchristianjuhl evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT kruselllarsromer evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT jakobsenlars evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT reiberjohanhc evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT lassenjensflensted evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT bøttchermorten evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT bøtkerhanserik evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT christiansenevaldhøj evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii
AT holmnielsramsing evaluationofcoronaryarterystenosisbyquantitativeflowratioduringinvasivecoronaryangiographythewifiiistudywirefreefunctionalimagingii