Cargando…

Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Targeted sequence capture can be used to efficiently gather sequence data for large numbers of loci, such as single‐copy nuclear loci. Most published studies in plants have used taxon‐specific locus sets developed individually for a clade using multiple genomic and transcriptom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chau, John H., Rahfeldt, Wolfgang A., Olmstead, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1032
_version_ 1783313610151297024
author Chau, John H.
Rahfeldt, Wolfgang A.
Olmstead, Richard G.
author_facet Chau, John H.
Rahfeldt, Wolfgang A.
Olmstead, Richard G.
author_sort Chau, John H.
collection PubMed
description PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Targeted sequence capture can be used to efficiently gather sequence data for large numbers of loci, such as single‐copy nuclear loci. Most published studies in plants have used taxon‐specific locus sets developed individually for a clade using multiple genomic and transcriptomic resources. General locus sets can also be developed from loci that have been identified as single‐copy and have orthologs in large clades of plants. METHODS: We identify and compare a taxon‐specific locus set and three general locus sets (conserved ortholog set [COSII], shared single‐copy nuclear [APVO SSC] genes, and pentatricopeptide repeat [PPR] genes) for targeted sequence capture in Buddleja (Scrophulariaceae) and outgroups. We evaluate their performance in terms of assembly success, sequence variability, and resolution and support of inferred phylogenetic trees. RESULTS: The taxon‐specific locus set had the most target loci. Assembly success was high for all locus sets in Buddleja samples. For outgroups, general locus sets had greater assembly success. Taxon‐specific and PPR loci had the highest average variability. The taxon‐specific data set produced the best‐supported tree, but all data sets showed improved resolution over previous non‐sequence capture data sets. DISCUSSION: General locus sets can be a useful source of sequence capture targets, especially if multiple genomic resources are not available for a taxon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58951902018-05-04 Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics Chau, John H. Rahfeldt, Wolfgang A. Olmstead, Richard G. Appl Plant Sci Application Articles PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Targeted sequence capture can be used to efficiently gather sequence data for large numbers of loci, such as single‐copy nuclear loci. Most published studies in plants have used taxon‐specific locus sets developed individually for a clade using multiple genomic and transcriptomic resources. General locus sets can also be developed from loci that have been identified as single‐copy and have orthologs in large clades of plants. METHODS: We identify and compare a taxon‐specific locus set and three general locus sets (conserved ortholog set [COSII], shared single‐copy nuclear [APVO SSC] genes, and pentatricopeptide repeat [PPR] genes) for targeted sequence capture in Buddleja (Scrophulariaceae) and outgroups. We evaluate their performance in terms of assembly success, sequence variability, and resolution and support of inferred phylogenetic trees. RESULTS: The taxon‐specific locus set had the most target loci. Assembly success was high for all locus sets in Buddleja samples. For outgroups, general locus sets had greater assembly success. Taxon‐specific and PPR loci had the highest average variability. The taxon‐specific data set produced the best‐supported tree, but all data sets showed improved resolution over previous non‐sequence capture data sets. DISCUSSION: General locus sets can be a useful source of sequence capture targets, especially if multiple genomic resources are not available for a taxon. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5895190/ /pubmed/29732262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1032 Text en © 2018 Chau et al. Applications in Plant Sciences is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Botanical Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Application Articles
Chau, John H.
Rahfeldt, Wolfgang A.
Olmstead, Richard G.
Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title_full Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title_fullStr Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title_short Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
title_sort comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics
topic Application Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1032
work_keys_str_mv AT chaujohnh comparisonoftaxonspecificversusgenerallocussetsfortargetedsequencecaptureinplantphylogenomics
AT rahfeldtwolfganga comparisonoftaxonspecificversusgenerallocussetsfortargetedsequencecaptureinplantphylogenomics
AT olmsteadrichardg comparisonoftaxonspecificversusgenerallocussetsfortargetedsequencecaptureinplantphylogenomics