Cargando…

Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth most frequent cause of cancer death in the whole world. Many studies have investigated the association between citrus fruit intake and the risk of EC, but the results are inconsistent and not analyzed by category. We aimed to perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Wenyue, Liu, Lu, Xu, Shun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29595629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010018
_version_ 1783313649623891968
author Zhao, Wenyue
Liu, Lu
Xu, Shun
author_facet Zhao, Wenyue
Liu, Lu
Xu, Shun
author_sort Zhao, Wenyue
collection PubMed
description Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth most frequent cause of cancer death in the whole world. Many studies have investigated the association between citrus fruit intake and the risk of EC, but the results are inconsistent and not analyzed by category. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of studies to evaluate the incidence between citrus fruit consumption and subtypes of esophageal cancer and derive a more precise estimation. Through searches of PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science we updated 1988 systematic review up to April 2016. Based on an inclusion and exclusion criteria, conventional meta-analysis according to DerSimonian and Laird method was used for the pooling of the results. Random-effect models were used to calculate subgroups. Twenty-five English articles (20 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies) comprising totally 5730 patients of esophageal cancer would be suitable for use in this study. The result indicated the inverse associations between intakes of citrus fruit and EC (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56−0.75, I(2) = 51.1%, P = .001), Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.47–0.76, I(2) = 60.7%, P = .002), no significant relationship between citrus fruit and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.74–1.01, I(2) = 0.0%, P = .598). This meta-analysis indicates that intakes of citrus fruit significantly reduce the risk of ESCC and is no obvious relationship with EAC. Further studies about constituents in citrus fruit and its mechanism are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58953832018-04-18 Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis Zhao, Wenyue Liu, Lu Xu, Shun Medicine (Baltimore) 5500 Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth most frequent cause of cancer death in the whole world. Many studies have investigated the association between citrus fruit intake and the risk of EC, but the results are inconsistent and not analyzed by category. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of studies to evaluate the incidence between citrus fruit consumption and subtypes of esophageal cancer and derive a more precise estimation. Through searches of PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science we updated 1988 systematic review up to April 2016. Based on an inclusion and exclusion criteria, conventional meta-analysis according to DerSimonian and Laird method was used for the pooling of the results. Random-effect models were used to calculate subgroups. Twenty-five English articles (20 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies) comprising totally 5730 patients of esophageal cancer would be suitable for use in this study. The result indicated the inverse associations between intakes of citrus fruit and EC (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56−0.75, I(2) = 51.1%, P = .001), Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.47–0.76, I(2) = 60.7%, P = .002), no significant relationship between citrus fruit and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.74–1.01, I(2) = 0.0%, P = .598). This meta-analysis indicates that intakes of citrus fruit significantly reduce the risk of ESCC and is no obvious relationship with EAC. Further studies about constituents in citrus fruit and its mechanism are warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5895383/ /pubmed/29595629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010018 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5500
Zhao, Wenyue
Liu, Lu
Xu, Shun
Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_short Intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_sort intakes of citrus fruit and risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic 5500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29595629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010018
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowenyue intakesofcitrusfruitandriskofesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT liulu intakesofcitrusfruitandriskofesophagealcancerametaanalysis
AT xushun intakesofcitrusfruitandriskofesophagealcancerametaanalysis