Cargando…

Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face

Real‐world objects approaching or passing by an observer often generate visual, auditory, and tactile signals with different onsets and durations. Prompt detection and avoidance of an impending threat depend on precise binding of looming signals across modalities. Here we constructed a multisensory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ruey‐Song, Chen, Ching‐fu, Sereno, Martin I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23995
_version_ 1783313668098752512
author Huang, Ruey‐Song
Chen, Ching‐fu
Sereno, Martin I.
author_facet Huang, Ruey‐Song
Chen, Ching‐fu
Sereno, Martin I.
author_sort Huang, Ruey‐Song
collection PubMed
description Real‐world objects approaching or passing by an observer often generate visual, auditory, and tactile signals with different onsets and durations. Prompt detection and avoidance of an impending threat depend on precise binding of looming signals across modalities. Here we constructed a multisensory apparatus to study the spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face. In a psychophysical experiment, subjects assessed the subjective synchrony between a looming ball and an air puff delivered to the same side of the face with a varying temporal offset. Multisensory stimuli with similar onset times were perceived as completely out of sync and assessed with the lowest subjective synchrony index (SSI). Across subjects, the SSI peaked at an offset between 800 and 1,000 ms, where the multisensory stimuli were perceived as optimally in sync. In an fMRI experiment, tactile, visual, tactile‐visual out‐of‐sync (TVoS), and tactile‐visual in‐sync (TViS) stimuli were delivered to either side of the face in randomized events. Group‐average statistical responses to different stimuli were compared within each surface‐based region of interest (sROI) outlined on the cortical surface. Most sROIs showed a preference for contralateral stimuli and higher responses to multisensory than unisensory stimuli. In several bilateral sROIs, particularly the human MT+ complex and V6A, responses to spatially aligned multisensory stimuli (TVoS) were further enhanced when the stimuli were in‐sync (TViS), as expressed by TVoS < TViS. This study demonstrates the perceptual and neural mechanisms of multisensory integration near the face, which has potential applications in the development of multisensory entertainment systems and media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58955222018-05-17 Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face Huang, Ruey‐Song Chen, Ching‐fu Sereno, Martin I. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Real‐world objects approaching or passing by an observer often generate visual, auditory, and tactile signals with different onsets and durations. Prompt detection and avoidance of an impending threat depend on precise binding of looming signals across modalities. Here we constructed a multisensory apparatus to study the spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face. In a psychophysical experiment, subjects assessed the subjective synchrony between a looming ball and an air puff delivered to the same side of the face with a varying temporal offset. Multisensory stimuli with similar onset times were perceived as completely out of sync and assessed with the lowest subjective synchrony index (SSI). Across subjects, the SSI peaked at an offset between 800 and 1,000 ms, where the multisensory stimuli were perceived as optimally in sync. In an fMRI experiment, tactile, visual, tactile‐visual out‐of‐sync (TVoS), and tactile‐visual in‐sync (TViS) stimuli were delivered to either side of the face in randomized events. Group‐average statistical responses to different stimuli were compared within each surface‐based region of interest (sROI) outlined on the cortical surface. Most sROIs showed a preference for contralateral stimuli and higher responses to multisensory than unisensory stimuli. In several bilateral sROIs, particularly the human MT+ complex and V6A, responses to spatially aligned multisensory stimuli (TVoS) were further enhanced when the stimuli were in‐sync (TViS), as expressed by TVoS < TViS. This study demonstrates the perceptual and neural mechanisms of multisensory integration near the face, which has potential applications in the development of multisensory entertainment systems and media. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5895522/ /pubmed/29411461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23995 Text en © 2018 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Huang, Ruey‐Song
Chen, Ching‐fu
Sereno, Martin I.
Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title_full Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title_short Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
title_sort spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23995
work_keys_str_mv AT huangrueysong spatiotemporalintegrationofloomingvisualandtactilestimulineartheface
AT chenchingfu spatiotemporalintegrationofloomingvisualandtactilestimulineartheface
AT serenomartini spatiotemporalintegrationofloomingvisualandtactilestimulineartheface