Cargando…
Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
Classical probability theory (CPT) has represented the rational standard for decision making in human cognition. Even though CPT has provided many descriptively excellent decision models, there have also been some empirical results persistently problematic for CPT accounts. The tension between the n...
Autores principales: | Wojciechowski, Bartosz W., Pothos, Emmanuel M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00391 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
por: Wojciechowski, Bartosz W., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Why the Conjunction Effect Is Rarely a Fallacy: How Learning Influences Uncertainty and the Conjunction Rule
por: Maguire, Phil, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Formalizing Heuristics in Decision-Making: A Quantum Probability Perspective
por: Pothos, Emmanuel M., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The conjunction fallacy in rats
por: González, Valeria V., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment
por: Lewinski, Peter
Publicado: (2015)