Cargando…
Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens’ Juries
BACKGROUND: The secondary use of health data for research raises complex questions of privacy and governance. Such questions are ill-suited to opinion polling where citizens must choose quickly between multiple-choice answers based on little information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to ext...
Autores principales: | Tully, Mary P, Bozentko, Kyle, Clement, Sarah, Hunn, Amanda, Hassan, Lamiece, Norris, Ruth, Oswald, Malcolm, Peek, Niels |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29592847 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7763 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
por: Ford, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Health data on public trial: To what extent should patients control access to patient records?
por: Oswald, Malcolm, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Commercial use of health data—A public “trial” by citizens' jury
por: Tully, Mary P., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trading off accuracy and explainability in AI decision-making:
findings from 2 citizens’ juries
por: van der Veer, Sabine N, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain
por: Baena-Cañada, José M, et al.
Publicado: (2018)