Cargando…

Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)

BACKGROUND: General consumers can now easily access drug information and quickly check for potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) through mobile health (mHealth) apps. With aging population in Canada, more people have chronic diseases and comorbidities leading to increasing numbers of medications....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ben YB, Sharafoddini, Anis, Tran, Nam, Wen, Emily Y, Lee, Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29592848
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8613
_version_ 1783313744022994944
author Kim, Ben YB
Sharafoddini, Anis
Tran, Nam
Wen, Emily Y
Lee, Joon
author_facet Kim, Ben YB
Sharafoddini, Anis
Tran, Nam
Wen, Emily Y
Lee, Joon
author_sort Kim, Ben YB
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General consumers can now easily access drug information and quickly check for potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) through mobile health (mHealth) apps. With aging population in Canada, more people have chronic diseases and comorbidities leading to increasing numbers of medications. The use of mHealth apps for checking PDDIs can be helpful in ensuring patient safety and empowerment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the characteristics and quality of publicly available mHealth apps that check for PDDIs. METHODS: Apple App Store and Google Play were searched to identify apps with PDDI functionality. The apps’ general and feature characteristics were extracted. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to assess the quality. RESULTS: A total of 23 apps were included for the review—12 from Apple App Store and 11 from Google Play. Only 5 of these were paid apps, with an average price of $7.19 CAD. The mean MARS score was 3.23 out of 5 (interquartile range 1.34). The mean MARS scores for the apps from Google Play and Apple App Store were not statistically different (P=.84). The information dimension was associated with the highest score (3.63), whereas the engagement dimension resulted in the lowest score (2.75). The total number of features per app, average rating, and price were significantly associated with the total MARS score. CONCLUSIONS: Some apps provided accurate and comprehensive information about potential adverse drug effects from PDDIs. Given the potentially severe consequences of incorrect drug information, there is a need for oversight to eliminate low quality and potentially harmful apps. Because managing PDDIs is complex in the absence of complete information, secondary features such as medication reminder, refill reminder, medication history tracking, and pill identification could help enhance the effectiveness of PDDI apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58959232018-04-16 Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) Kim, Ben YB Sharafoddini, Anis Tran, Nam Wen, Emily Y Lee, Joon JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Review BACKGROUND: General consumers can now easily access drug information and quickly check for potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) through mobile health (mHealth) apps. With aging population in Canada, more people have chronic diseases and comorbidities leading to increasing numbers of medications. The use of mHealth apps for checking PDDIs can be helpful in ensuring patient safety and empowerment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the characteristics and quality of publicly available mHealth apps that check for PDDIs. METHODS: Apple App Store and Google Play were searched to identify apps with PDDI functionality. The apps’ general and feature characteristics were extracted. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to assess the quality. RESULTS: A total of 23 apps were included for the review—12 from Apple App Store and 11 from Google Play. Only 5 of these were paid apps, with an average price of $7.19 CAD. The mean MARS score was 3.23 out of 5 (interquartile range 1.34). The mean MARS scores for the apps from Google Play and Apple App Store were not statistically different (P=.84). The information dimension was associated with the highest score (3.63), whereas the engagement dimension resulted in the lowest score (2.75). The total number of features per app, average rating, and price were significantly associated with the total MARS score. CONCLUSIONS: Some apps provided accurate and comprehensive information about potential adverse drug effects from PDDIs. Given the potentially severe consequences of incorrect drug information, there is a need for oversight to eliminate low quality and potentially harmful apps. Because managing PDDIs is complex in the absence of complete information, secondary features such as medication reminder, refill reminder, medication history tracking, and pill identification could help enhance the effectiveness of PDDI apps. JMIR Publications 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5895923/ /pubmed/29592848 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8613 Text en ©Ben YB Kim, Anis Sharafoddini, Nam Tran, Emily Y Wen, Joon Lee. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 28.03.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Ben YB
Sharafoddini, Anis
Tran, Nam
Wen, Emily Y
Lee, Joon
Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title_full Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title_fullStr Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title_full_unstemmed Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title_short Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
title_sort consumer mobile apps for potential drug-drug interaction check: systematic review and content analysis using the mobile app rating scale (mars)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29592848
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8613
work_keys_str_mv AT kimbenyb consumermobileappsforpotentialdrugdruginteractionchecksystematicreviewandcontentanalysisusingthemobileappratingscalemars
AT sharafoddinianis consumermobileappsforpotentialdrugdruginteractionchecksystematicreviewandcontentanalysisusingthemobileappratingscalemars
AT trannam consumermobileappsforpotentialdrugdruginteractionchecksystematicreviewandcontentanalysisusingthemobileappratingscalemars
AT wenemilyy consumermobileappsforpotentialdrugdruginteractionchecksystematicreviewandcontentanalysisusingthemobileappratingscalemars
AT leejoon consumermobileappsforpotentialdrugdruginteractionchecksystematicreviewandcontentanalysisusingthemobileappratingscalemars