Cargando…

Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Ready-made spectacles have been suggested as a less resource-intensive treatment for the millions of people living with uncorrected refractive error (URE) in low-income environments. In spite of this interest, there have been no published economic evaluations examining the cost-effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angell, Blake, Ali, Ferhina, Gandhi, Monica, Mathur, Umang, Friedman, David S, Jan, Stephen, Keay, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000123
_version_ 1783313752203984896
author Angell, Blake
Ali, Ferhina
Gandhi, Monica
Mathur, Umang
Friedman, David S
Jan, Stephen
Keay, Lisa
author_facet Angell, Blake
Ali, Ferhina
Gandhi, Monica
Mathur, Umang
Friedman, David S
Jan, Stephen
Keay, Lisa
author_sort Angell, Blake
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Ready-made spectacles have been suggested as a less resource-intensive treatment for the millions of people living with uncorrected refractive error (URE) in low-income environments. In spite of this interest, there have been no published economic evaluations examining the cost-effectiveness of ready-made spectacles. This study aims to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of offering ready-made spectacles (RMS) relative to no intervention as well as the relative cost-effectiveness of custom-made spectacles (CS) relative to RMS to treat URE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The relative cost-effectiveness of RMS relative to CS and no intervention was tested through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the health service provider perspective conducted alongside a double-masked randomised controlled trial in an urban hospital in Delhi, India. Participants were adults aged 18–45 years with ≥1 dioptre (D) of URE. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the CS and RMS interventions in improving visual acuity, but the CS was over four times the price of the RMS per patient (204 INR (US$2.42) and 792 INR (US$11.22)). The cost per unit improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) relative to baseline with the RMS intervention was 407 INR (US$4.35). Existing estimates of utility resulting from improvements in visual acuity result in incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained of between 212 INR and 1137 INR (US$0.44–US$23.74) depending on the source of the utility estimate and assumed expected life of the spectacles. CONCLUSION: RMS represent a significantly cost-effective option for spectacle provision in low-resource settings. The RMS programme was substantially cheaper than an equivalent CS intervention while being effective in improving visual acuity for the majority of adults with refractive error in this setting. These findings provide further support for including RMS in programmes to address URE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00657670, Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5895972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58959722018-04-13 Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial Angell, Blake Ali, Ferhina Gandhi, Monica Mathur, Umang Friedman, David S Jan, Stephen Keay, Lisa BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Ready-made spectacles have been suggested as a less resource-intensive treatment for the millions of people living with uncorrected refractive error (URE) in low-income environments. In spite of this interest, there have been no published economic evaluations examining the cost-effectiveness of ready-made spectacles. This study aims to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of offering ready-made spectacles (RMS) relative to no intervention as well as the relative cost-effectiveness of custom-made spectacles (CS) relative to RMS to treat URE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The relative cost-effectiveness of RMS relative to CS and no intervention was tested through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the health service provider perspective conducted alongside a double-masked randomised controlled trial in an urban hospital in Delhi, India. Participants were adults aged 18–45 years with ≥1 dioptre (D) of URE. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the CS and RMS interventions in improving visual acuity, but the CS was over four times the price of the RMS per patient (204 INR (US$2.42) and 792 INR (US$11.22)). The cost per unit improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) relative to baseline with the RMS intervention was 407 INR (US$4.35). Existing estimates of utility resulting from improvements in visual acuity result in incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained of between 212 INR and 1137 INR (US$0.44–US$23.74) depending on the source of the utility estimate and assumed expected life of the spectacles. CONCLUSION: RMS represent a significantly cost-effective option for spectacle provision in low-resource settings. The RMS programme was substantially cheaper than an equivalent CS intervention while being effective in improving visual acuity for the majority of adults with refractive error in this setting. These findings provide further support for including RMS in programmes to address URE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00657670, Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5895972/ /pubmed/29657979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000123 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Angell, Blake
Ali, Ferhina
Gandhi, Monica
Mathur, Umang
Friedman, David S
Jan, Stephen
Keay, Lisa
Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in india: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29657979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000123
work_keys_str_mv AT angellblake readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aliferhina readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gandhimonica readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mathurumang readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT friedmandavids readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janstephen readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keaylisa readymadeandcustommadeeyeglassesinindiaacosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial