Cargando…
GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes
BACKGROUND: High quality functional annotation is essential for understanding the phenotypic consequences encoded in a genome. Despite improvements in bioinformatics methods, millions of sequences in databanks are not assigned reliable functions. The curation of protein functions in the context of b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29642842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2126-1 |
_version_ | 1783313765038555136 |
---|---|
author | Mercier, Jonathan Josso, Adrien Médigue, Claudine Vallenet, David |
author_facet | Mercier, Jonathan Josso, Adrien Médigue, Claudine Vallenet, David |
author_sort | Mercier, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High quality functional annotation is essential for understanding the phenotypic consequences encoded in a genome. Despite improvements in bioinformatics methods, millions of sequences in databanks are not assigned reliable functions. The curation of protein functions in the context of biological processes is a way to evaluate and improve their annotation. RESULTS: We developed an expert system using paraconsistent logic, named GROOLS (Genomic Rule Object-Oriented Logic System), that evaluates the completeness and the consistency of predicted functions through biological processes like metabolic pathways. Using a generic and hierarchical representation of knowledge, biological processes are modeled in a graph from which observations (i.e. predictions and expectations) are propagated by rules. At the end of the reasoning, conclusions are assigned to biological process components and highlight uncertainties and inconsistencies. Results on 14 microbial organisms are presented. CONCLUSIONS: GROOLS software is designed to evaluate the overall accuracy of functional unit and pathway predictions according to organism experimental data like growth phenotypes. It assists biocurators in the functional annotation of proteins by focusing on missing or contradictory observations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2126-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5896057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58960572018-04-20 GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes Mercier, Jonathan Josso, Adrien Médigue, Claudine Vallenet, David BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: High quality functional annotation is essential for understanding the phenotypic consequences encoded in a genome. Despite improvements in bioinformatics methods, millions of sequences in databanks are not assigned reliable functions. The curation of protein functions in the context of biological processes is a way to evaluate and improve their annotation. RESULTS: We developed an expert system using paraconsistent logic, named GROOLS (Genomic Rule Object-Oriented Logic System), that evaluates the completeness and the consistency of predicted functions through biological processes like metabolic pathways. Using a generic and hierarchical representation of knowledge, biological processes are modeled in a graph from which observations (i.e. predictions and expectations) are propagated by rules. At the end of the reasoning, conclusions are assigned to biological process components and highlight uncertainties and inconsistencies. Results on 14 microbial organisms are presented. CONCLUSIONS: GROOLS software is designed to evaluate the overall accuracy of functional unit and pathway predictions according to organism experimental data like growth phenotypes. It assists biocurators in the functional annotation of proteins by focusing on missing or contradictory observations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2126-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5896057/ /pubmed/29642842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2126-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Mercier, Jonathan Josso, Adrien Médigue, Claudine Vallenet, David GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title | GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title_full | GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title_fullStr | GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title_full_unstemmed | GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title_short | GROOLS: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
title_sort | grools: reactive graph reasoning for genome annotation through biological processes |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29642842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2126-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercierjonathan groolsreactivegraphreasoningforgenomeannotationthroughbiologicalprocesses AT jossoadrien groolsreactivegraphreasoningforgenomeannotationthroughbiologicalprocesses AT medigueclaudine groolsreactivegraphreasoningforgenomeannotationthroughbiologicalprocesses AT vallenetdavid groolsreactivegraphreasoningforgenomeannotationthroughbiologicalprocesses |