Cargando…

Prevalence and types of preanalytical error in hematology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in South India

BACKGROUND: An important component of laboratory medicine is preanalytical phase. Since laboratory report plays a major role in patient management, more importance should be given to the quality of laboratory tests. AIM: The present study was undertaken to find the prevalence and types of preanalyti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arul, Pitchaikaran, Pushparaj, Magesh, Pandian, Kanmani, Chennimalai, Lingasamy, Rajendran, Karthika, Selvaraj, Eniya, Masilamani, Suresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692594
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP_98_17
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: An important component of laboratory medicine is preanalytical phase. Since laboratory report plays a major role in patient management, more importance should be given to the quality of laboratory tests. AIM: The present study was undertaken to find the prevalence and types of preanalytical errors at a tertiary care hospital in South India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 118,732 samples ([62,474 outpatient department [OPD] and 56,258 inpatient department [IPD]) were received in hematology laboratory. These samples were analyzed for preanalytical errors such as misidentification, incorrect vials, inadequate samples, clotted samples, diluted samples, and hemolyzed samples. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of preanalytical errors found was 513 samples, which is 0.43% of the total number of samples received. The most common preanalytical error observed was inadequate samples followed by clotted samples. Overall frequencies (both OPD and IPD) of preanalytical errors such as misidentification, incorrect vials, inadequate samples, clotted samples, diluted samples, and hemolyzed samples were 0.02%, 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.12%, 0.02%, and 0.03%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study concluded that incorrect phlebotomy techniques due to lack of awareness is the main reason for preanalytical errors. This can be avoided by proper communication and coordination between laboratory and wards, proper training and continuing medical education programs for laboratory and paramedical staffs, and knowledge of the intervening factors that can influence laboratory results.