Cargando…

Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies

PURPOSE: To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midena, Edoardo, Gillies, Mark, Katz, Todd A., Metzig, Carola, Lu, Chengxing, Ogura, Yuichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640135
_version_ 1783313804477595648
author Midena, Edoardo
Gillies, Mark
Katz, Todd A.
Metzig, Carola
Lu, Chengxing
Ogura, Yuichiro
author_facet Midena, Edoardo
Gillies, Mark
Katz, Todd A.
Metzig, Carola
Lu, Chengxing
Ogura, Yuichiro
author_sort Midena, Edoardo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. RESULTS: At weeks 52 and 100, outcomes with intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 and 2q8 were superior to those in laser control-treated patients regardless of baseline CRT. When looked at in a binary fashion, the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser was not significantly better in the ≥400 μm than the <400 μm group; when looked at as a continuous variable, baseline CRT seemed to have an impact on the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser. CONCLUSIONS: Post hoc analyses of VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME demonstrated the benefits of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in DME patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. This trial is registered with NCT01331681 and NCT01363440.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5896224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58962242018-05-21 Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies Midena, Edoardo Gillies, Mark Katz, Todd A. Metzig, Carola Lu, Chengxing Ogura, Yuichiro J Ophthalmol Clinical Study PURPOSE: To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. RESULTS: At weeks 52 and 100, outcomes with intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 and 2q8 were superior to those in laser control-treated patients regardless of baseline CRT. When looked at in a binary fashion, the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser was not significantly better in the ≥400 μm than the <400 μm group; when looked at as a continuous variable, baseline CRT seemed to have an impact on the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser. CONCLUSIONS: Post hoc analyses of VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME demonstrated the benefits of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in DME patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. This trial is registered with NCT01331681 and NCT01363440. Hindawi 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5896224/ /pubmed/29785301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640135 Text en Copyright © 2018 Edoardo Midena et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Midena, Edoardo
Gillies, Mark
Katz, Todd A.
Metzig, Carola
Lu, Chengxing
Ogura, Yuichiro
Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title_full Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title_fullStr Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title_short Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
title_sort impact of baseline central retinal thickness on outcomes in the vivid-dme and vista-dme studies
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640135
work_keys_str_mv AT midenaedoardo impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies
AT gilliesmark impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies
AT katztodda impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies
AT metzigcarola impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies
AT luchengxing impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies
AT ogurayuichiro impactofbaselinecentralretinalthicknessonoutcomesinthevividdmeandvistadmestudies