Cargando…
From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153 |
_version_ | 1783313850979844096 |
---|---|
author | Poot, Charlotte C van der Kleij, Rianne M Brakema, Evelyn A Vermond, Debbie Williams, Siân Cragg, Liza van den Broek, Jos M Chavannes, Niels H |
author_facet | Poot, Charlotte C van der Kleij, Rianne M Brakema, Evelyn A Vermond, Debbie Williams, Siân Cragg, Liza van den Broek, Jos M Chavannes, Niels H |
author_sort | Poot, Charlotte C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. METHODS: A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is ‘said’ (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. RESULTS: The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5896638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58966382018-04-17 From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach Poot, Charlotte C van der Kleij, Rianne M Brakema, Evelyn A Vermond, Debbie Williams, Siân Cragg, Liza van den Broek, Jos M Chavannes, Niels H J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. METHODS: A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is ‘said’ (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. RESULTS: The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized. Oxford University Press 2018-03 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5896638/ /pubmed/29538728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Poot, Charlotte C van der Kleij, Rianne M Brakema, Evelyn A Vermond, Debbie Williams, Siân Cragg, Liza van den Broek, Jos M Chavannes, Niels H From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title | From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title_full | From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title_fullStr | From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title_full_unstemmed | From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title_short | From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
title_sort | from research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pootcharlottec fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT vanderkleijriannem fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT brakemaevelyna fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT vermonddebbie fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT williamssian fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT craggliza fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT vandenbroekjosm fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach AT chavannesnielsh fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach |