Cargando…

From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach

BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poot, Charlotte C, van der Kleij, Rianne M, Brakema, Evelyn A, Vermond, Debbie, Williams, Siân, Cragg, Liza, van den Broek, Jos M, Chavannes, Niels H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153
_version_ 1783313850979844096
author Poot, Charlotte C
van der Kleij, Rianne M
Brakema, Evelyn A
Vermond, Debbie
Williams, Siân
Cragg, Liza
van den Broek, Jos M
Chavannes, Niels H
author_facet Poot, Charlotte C
van der Kleij, Rianne M
Brakema, Evelyn A
Vermond, Debbie
Williams, Siân
Cragg, Liza
van den Broek, Jos M
Chavannes, Niels H
author_sort Poot, Charlotte C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. METHODS: A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is ‘said’ (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. RESULTS: The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5896638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58966382018-04-17 From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach Poot, Charlotte C van der Kleij, Rianne M Brakema, Evelyn A Vermond, Debbie Williams, Siân Cragg, Liza van den Broek, Jos M Chavannes, Niels H J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge creation forms an integral part of the knowledge-to-action framework aimed at bridging the gap between research and evidence-informed decision making. Although principles of science communication, data visualisation and user-centred design largely impact the effectiveness of communication, their role in knowledge creation is still limited. Hence, this article aims to provide researchers a systematic approach on how knowledge creation can be put into practice. METHODS: A systematic two-phased approach towards knowledge creation was formulated and executed. First, during a preparation phase the purpose and audience of the knowledge were defined. Subsequently, a developmental phase facilitated how the content is ‘said’ (language) and communicated (channel). This developmental phase proceeded via two pathways: a translational cycle and design cycle, during which core translational and design components were incorporated. The entire approach was demonstrated by a case study. RESULTS: The case study demonstrated how the phases in this systematic approach can be operationalised. It furthermore illustrated how created knowledge can be delivered. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach offers researchers a systematic, practical and easy-to-implement tool to facilitate effective knowledge creation towards decision-makers in healthcare. Through the integration of core components of knowledge creation evidence-informed decision making will ultimately be optimized. Oxford University Press 2018-03 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5896638/ /pubmed/29538728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Poot, Charlotte C
van der Kleij, Rianne M
Brakema, Evelyn A
Vermond, Debbie
Williams, Siân
Cragg, Liza
van den Broek, Jos M
Chavannes, Niels H
From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title_full From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title_fullStr From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title_full_unstemmed From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title_short From research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
title_sort from research to evidence-informed decision making: a systematic approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx153
work_keys_str_mv AT pootcharlottec fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT vanderkleijriannem fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT brakemaevelyna fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT vermonddebbie fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT williamssian fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT craggliza fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT vandenbroekjosm fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach
AT chavannesnielsh fromresearchtoevidenceinformeddecisionmakingasystematicapproach