Cargando…

Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND: Increasing breastfeeding rates have been associated with reductions in disease in babies and mothers as well as in related costs. ‘Nourishing Start for Health (NoSH)’, a financial incentive scheme has been proposed as a potentially effective way to increase both the number of mothers bre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Frauke, Anokye, Nana, de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., Higgins, Ailish, Relton, Clare, Strong, Mark, Fox-Rushby, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194231
_version_ 1783313884678979584
author Becker, Frauke
Anokye, Nana
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Higgins, Ailish
Relton, Clare
Strong, Mark
Fox-Rushby, Julia
author_facet Becker, Frauke
Anokye, Nana
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Higgins, Ailish
Relton, Clare
Strong, Mark
Fox-Rushby, Julia
author_sort Becker, Frauke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing breastfeeding rates have been associated with reductions in disease in babies and mothers as well as in related costs. ‘Nourishing Start for Health (NoSH)’, a financial incentive scheme has been proposed as a potentially effective way to increase both the number of mothers breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding. AIMS: To establish women’s relative preferences for different aspects of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding and to identify importance of scheme characteristics on probability on participation in an incentive scheme. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) obtained information on alternative specifications of the NoSH scheme designed to promote continued breastfeeding duration until at least 6 weeks after birth. Four attributes framed alternative scheme designs: value of the incentive; minimum breastfeeding duration required to receive incentive; method of verifying breastfeeding; type of incentive. Three versions of the DCE questionnaire, each containing 8 different choice sets, provided 24 choice sets for analysis. The questionnaire was mailed to 2,531 women in the South Yorkshire Cohort (SYC) aged 16–45 years in IMD quintiles 3–5. The analytic approach considered conditional and mixed effects logistic models to account for preference heterogeneity that may be associated with a variation in effects mediated by respondents’ characteristics. RESULTS: 564 women completed the questionnaire and a response rate of 22% was achieved. Most of the included attributes were found to affect utility and therefore the probability to participate in the incentive scheme. Higher rewards were preferred, although the type of incentive significantly affected women’s preferences on average. We found evidence for preference heterogeneity based on individual characteristics that mediated preferences for an incentive scheme.Conclusions Although participants’ opinion in our sample was mixed, financial incentives for breastfeeding may be an acceptable and effective instrument to change behaviour. However, individual characteristics could mediate the effect and should therefore be considered when developing and targeting future interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5896913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58969132018-05-04 Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment Becker, Frauke Anokye, Nana de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. Higgins, Ailish Relton, Clare Strong, Mark Fox-Rushby, Julia PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing breastfeeding rates have been associated with reductions in disease in babies and mothers as well as in related costs. ‘Nourishing Start for Health (NoSH)’, a financial incentive scheme has been proposed as a potentially effective way to increase both the number of mothers breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding. AIMS: To establish women’s relative preferences for different aspects of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding and to identify importance of scheme characteristics on probability on participation in an incentive scheme. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) obtained information on alternative specifications of the NoSH scheme designed to promote continued breastfeeding duration until at least 6 weeks after birth. Four attributes framed alternative scheme designs: value of the incentive; minimum breastfeeding duration required to receive incentive; method of verifying breastfeeding; type of incentive. Three versions of the DCE questionnaire, each containing 8 different choice sets, provided 24 choice sets for analysis. The questionnaire was mailed to 2,531 women in the South Yorkshire Cohort (SYC) aged 16–45 years in IMD quintiles 3–5. The analytic approach considered conditional and mixed effects logistic models to account for preference heterogeneity that may be associated with a variation in effects mediated by respondents’ characteristics. RESULTS: 564 women completed the questionnaire and a response rate of 22% was achieved. Most of the included attributes were found to affect utility and therefore the probability to participate in the incentive scheme. Higher rewards were preferred, although the type of incentive significantly affected women’s preferences on average. We found evidence for preference heterogeneity based on individual characteristics that mediated preferences for an incentive scheme.Conclusions Although participants’ opinion in our sample was mixed, financial incentives for breastfeeding may be an acceptable and effective instrument to change behaviour. However, individual characteristics could mediate the effect and should therefore be considered when developing and targeting future interventions. Public Library of Science 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5896913/ /pubmed/29649245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194231 Text en © 2018 Becker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Becker, Frauke
Anokye, Nana
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Higgins, Ailish
Relton, Clare
Strong, Mark
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title_full Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title_short Women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: A discrete choice experiment
title_sort women’s preferences for alternative financial incentive schemes for breastfeeding: a discrete choice experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194231
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerfrauke womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT anokyenana womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT debekkergrobestherw womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT higginsailish womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT reltonclare womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT strongmark womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT foxrushbyjulia womenspreferencesforalternativefinancialincentiveschemesforbreastfeedingadiscretechoiceexperiment