Cargando…
A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation
We investigate the feasibility of using a surrogate-based method to emulate the deformation and detachment behaviour of a biofilm in response to hydrodynamic shear stress. The influence of shear force, growth rate and viscoelastic parameters on the patterns of growth, structure and resulting shape o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195484 |
_version_ | 1783313893311905792 |
---|---|
author | Oyebamiji, Oluwole K. Wilkinson, Darren J. Jayathilake, Pahala Gedara Rushton, Steve P. Bridgens, Ben Li, Bowen Zuliani, Paolo |
author_facet | Oyebamiji, Oluwole K. Wilkinson, Darren J. Jayathilake, Pahala Gedara Rushton, Steve P. Bridgens, Ben Li, Bowen Zuliani, Paolo |
author_sort | Oyebamiji, Oluwole K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigate the feasibility of using a surrogate-based method to emulate the deformation and detachment behaviour of a biofilm in response to hydrodynamic shear stress. The influence of shear force, growth rate and viscoelastic parameters on the patterns of growth, structure and resulting shape of microbial biofilms was examined. We develop a statistical modelling approach to this problem, using combination of Bayesian Poisson regression and dynamic linear models for the emulation. We observe that the hydrodynamic shear force affects biofilm deformation in line with some literature. Sensitivity results also showed that the expected number of shear events, shear flow, yield coefficient for heterotrophic bacteria and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) stiffness per unit EPS mass are the four principal mechanisms governing the bacteria detachment in this study. The sensitivity of the model parameters is temporally dynamic, emphasising the significance of conducting the sensitivity analysis across multiple time points. The surrogate models are shown to perform well, and produced ≈ 480 fold increase in computational efficiency. We conclude that a surrogate-based approach is effective, and resulting biofilm structure is determined primarily by a balance between bacteria growth, viscoelastic parameters and applied shear stress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5896950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58969502018-05-04 A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation Oyebamiji, Oluwole K. Wilkinson, Darren J. Jayathilake, Pahala Gedara Rushton, Steve P. Bridgens, Ben Li, Bowen Zuliani, Paolo PLoS One Research Article We investigate the feasibility of using a surrogate-based method to emulate the deformation and detachment behaviour of a biofilm in response to hydrodynamic shear stress. The influence of shear force, growth rate and viscoelastic parameters on the patterns of growth, structure and resulting shape of microbial biofilms was examined. We develop a statistical modelling approach to this problem, using combination of Bayesian Poisson regression and dynamic linear models for the emulation. We observe that the hydrodynamic shear force affects biofilm deformation in line with some literature. Sensitivity results also showed that the expected number of shear events, shear flow, yield coefficient for heterotrophic bacteria and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) stiffness per unit EPS mass are the four principal mechanisms governing the bacteria detachment in this study. The sensitivity of the model parameters is temporally dynamic, emphasising the significance of conducting the sensitivity analysis across multiple time points. The surrogate models are shown to perform well, and produced ≈ 480 fold increase in computational efficiency. We conclude that a surrogate-based approach is effective, and resulting biofilm structure is determined primarily by a balance between bacteria growth, viscoelastic parameters and applied shear stress. Public Library of Science 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5896950/ /pubmed/29649240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195484 Text en © 2018 Oyebamiji et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oyebamiji, Oluwole K. Wilkinson, Darren J. Jayathilake, Pahala Gedara Rushton, Steve P. Bridgens, Ben Li, Bowen Zuliani, Paolo A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title | A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title_full | A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title_fullStr | A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title_short | A Bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
title_sort | bayesian approach to modelling the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress on biofilm deformation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oyebamijioluwolek abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT wilkinsondarrenj abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT jayathilakepahalagedara abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT rushtonstevep abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT bridgensben abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT libowen abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT zulianipaolo abayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT oyebamijioluwolek bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT wilkinsondarrenj bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT jayathilakepahalagedara bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT rushtonstevep bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT bridgensben bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT libowen bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation AT zulianipaolo bayesianapproachtomodellingtheimpactofhydrodynamicshearstressonbiofilmdeformation |