Cargando…

Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico

The main objective of this work was to quantify and update the U.S. Midwest agricultural state of Iowa’s contribution of nitrate-nitrogen to the Mississippi River stream network against the backdrop of the ongoing problem of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. To achieve this objective, we used stream nitrate a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Christopher S., Nielsen, Jacob K., Schilling, Keith E., Weber, Larry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195930
_version_ 1783313906132844544
author Jones, Christopher S.
Nielsen, Jacob K.
Schilling, Keith E.
Weber, Larry J.
author_facet Jones, Christopher S.
Nielsen, Jacob K.
Schilling, Keith E.
Weber, Larry J.
author_sort Jones, Christopher S.
collection PubMed
description The main objective of this work was to quantify and update the U.S. Midwest agricultural state of Iowa’s contribution of nitrate-nitrogen to the Mississippi River stream network against the backdrop of the ongoing problem of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. To achieve this objective, we used stream nitrate and discharge data collected from 1999 until 2016 at 23 Iowa stream sites near watershed outlets, along with publicly-available data for sites downstream of Iowa on the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. Our analysis shows that Iowa contributes between 11 and 52% of the long-term nitrate load to the Mississippi-Atchafalaya Basin, 20 to 63% to the Upper Mississippi River Basin, and 20 to 89% to the Missouri River Basin, with averages of 29, 45 and 55% respectively. Since 1999, nitrate loads in the Iowa-inclusive basins have increased and these increases do not appear to be driven by changes in discharge and cropping intensity unique to Iowa. The 5-year running annual average of Iowa nitrate loading has been above the 2003 level for ten consecutive years, implying that Gulf hypoxic areal goals, also based on a 5-year running annual average, will be very difficult to achieve if nitrate retention cannot be improved in Iowa. An opportunity exists for land managers, policy makers and conservationists to manifest a positive effect on water quality by targeting and implementing nitrate reducing-practices in areas like Iowa while avoiding areas that are less likely to affect Gulf of Mexico hypoxia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5897004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58970042018-05-04 Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico Jones, Christopher S. Nielsen, Jacob K. Schilling, Keith E. Weber, Larry J. PLoS One Research Article The main objective of this work was to quantify and update the U.S. Midwest agricultural state of Iowa’s contribution of nitrate-nitrogen to the Mississippi River stream network against the backdrop of the ongoing problem of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. To achieve this objective, we used stream nitrate and discharge data collected from 1999 until 2016 at 23 Iowa stream sites near watershed outlets, along with publicly-available data for sites downstream of Iowa on the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. Our analysis shows that Iowa contributes between 11 and 52% of the long-term nitrate load to the Mississippi-Atchafalaya Basin, 20 to 63% to the Upper Mississippi River Basin, and 20 to 89% to the Missouri River Basin, with averages of 29, 45 and 55% respectively. Since 1999, nitrate loads in the Iowa-inclusive basins have increased and these increases do not appear to be driven by changes in discharge and cropping intensity unique to Iowa. The 5-year running annual average of Iowa nitrate loading has been above the 2003 level for ten consecutive years, implying that Gulf hypoxic areal goals, also based on a 5-year running annual average, will be very difficult to achieve if nitrate retention cannot be improved in Iowa. An opportunity exists for land managers, policy makers and conservationists to manifest a positive effect on water quality by targeting and implementing nitrate reducing-practices in areas like Iowa while avoiding areas that are less likely to affect Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. Public Library of Science 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5897004/ /pubmed/29649312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195930 Text en © 2018 Jones et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jones, Christopher S.
Nielsen, Jacob K.
Schilling, Keith E.
Weber, Larry J.
Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title_full Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title_fullStr Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title_short Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico
title_sort iowa stream nitrate and the gulf of mexico
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195930
work_keys_str_mv AT joneschristophers iowastreamnitrateandthegulfofmexico
AT nielsenjacobk iowastreamnitrateandthegulfofmexico
AT schillingkeithe iowastreamnitrateandthegulfofmexico
AT weberlarryj iowastreamnitrateandthegulfofmexico