Cargando…
Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research m...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6 |
_version_ | 1783313967662235648 |
---|---|
author | Penders, Bart |
author_facet | Penders, Bart |
author_sort | Penders, Bart |
collection | PubMed |
description | Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research misconduct, namely plagiarism, in the context of different epistemological positions. While from a positivist view of science, plagiarism only influences trust in science but not the content of the scientific corpus, from a constructivist point of view both are at stake. Consequently, I argue that discussions of research misconduct and responsible research ought to be explicitly informed by the authors’ views on the relationship between science and the knowledge it produces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5897471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58974712018-04-16 Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth Penders, Bart J Bioeth Inq Critical Perspectives Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research misconduct, namely plagiarism, in the context of different epistemological positions. While from a positivist view of science, plagiarism only influences trust in science but not the content of the scientific corpus, from a constructivist point of view both are at stake. Consequently, I argue that discussions of research misconduct and responsible research ought to be explicitly informed by the authors’ views on the relationship between science and the knowledge it produces. Springer Singapore 2017-12-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5897471/ /pubmed/29234992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Critical Perspectives Penders, Bart Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title | Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title_full | Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title_fullStr | Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title_full_unstemmed | Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title_short | Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth |
title_sort | beyond trust: plagiarism and truth |
topic | Critical Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pendersbart beyondtrustplagiarismandtruth |