Cargando…

Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth

Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Penders, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6
_version_ 1783313967662235648
author Penders, Bart
author_facet Penders, Bart
author_sort Penders, Bart
collection PubMed
description Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research misconduct, namely plagiarism, in the context of different epistemological positions. While from a positivist view of science, plagiarism only influences trust in science but not the content of the scientific corpus, from a constructivist point of view both are at stake. Consequently, I argue that discussions of research misconduct and responsible research ought to be explicitly informed by the authors’ views on the relationship between science and the knowledge it produces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5897471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58974712018-04-16 Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth Penders, Bart J Bioeth Inq Critical Perspectives Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research misconduct, namely plagiarism, in the context of different epistemological positions. While from a positivist view of science, plagiarism only influences trust in science but not the content of the scientific corpus, from a constructivist point of view both are at stake. Consequently, I argue that discussions of research misconduct and responsible research ought to be explicitly informed by the authors’ views on the relationship between science and the knowledge it produces. Springer Singapore 2017-12-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5897471/ /pubmed/29234992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Critical Perspectives
Penders, Bart
Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title_full Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title_fullStr Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title_short Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
title_sort beyond trust: plagiarism and truth
topic Critical Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pendersbart beyondtrustplagiarismandtruth