Cargando…

Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution

Establishing the origin and function of unusual traits in fossil taxa provides a crucial tool in understanding macroevolutionary patterns over long periods of time. Ceratopsian dinosaurs are known for their exaggerated and often elaborate horns and frills, which vary considerably between species. Ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knapp, Andrew, Knell, Robert J., Farke, Andrew A., Loewen, Mark A., Hone, David W. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0312
_version_ 1783313999132098560
author Knapp, Andrew
Knell, Robert J.
Farke, Andrew A.
Loewen, Mark A.
Hone, David W. E.
author_facet Knapp, Andrew
Knell, Robert J.
Farke, Andrew A.
Loewen, Mark A.
Hone, David W. E.
author_sort Knapp, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Establishing the origin and function of unusual traits in fossil taxa provides a crucial tool in understanding macroevolutionary patterns over long periods of time. Ceratopsian dinosaurs are known for their exaggerated and often elaborate horns and frills, which vary considerably between species. Many explanations have been proposed for the origin and evolution of these ‘ornamental’ traits, from predator defence to socio-sexual dominance signalling and, more recently, species recognition. A key prediction of the species recognition hypothesis is that two or more species possessing divergent ornamental traits should have been at least partially sympatric. For the first time to our knowledge, we test this hypothesis in ceratopsians by conducting a comparison of the morphological characters of 46 species. A total of 350 ceratopsian cladistic characters were categorized as either ‘internal’, ‘display’ (i.e. ornamental) or ‘non display’. Patterns of diversity of these characters were evaluated across 1035 unique species pairs. Display characters were found to diverge rapidly overall, but sympatric species were not found to differ significantly in their ornamental disparity from non-sympatric species, regardless of phylogenetic distance. The prediction of the species recognition hypothesis, and thus the idea that ornamentation evolved as a species recognition mechanism, has no statistical support among known ceratopsians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5897650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58976502018-04-13 Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution Knapp, Andrew Knell, Robert J. Farke, Andrew A. Loewen, Mark A. Hone, David W. E. Proc Biol Sci Palaeobiology Establishing the origin and function of unusual traits in fossil taxa provides a crucial tool in understanding macroevolutionary patterns over long periods of time. Ceratopsian dinosaurs are known for their exaggerated and often elaborate horns and frills, which vary considerably between species. Many explanations have been proposed for the origin and evolution of these ‘ornamental’ traits, from predator defence to socio-sexual dominance signalling and, more recently, species recognition. A key prediction of the species recognition hypothesis is that two or more species possessing divergent ornamental traits should have been at least partially sympatric. For the first time to our knowledge, we test this hypothesis in ceratopsians by conducting a comparison of the morphological characters of 46 species. A total of 350 ceratopsian cladistic characters were categorized as either ‘internal’, ‘display’ (i.e. ornamental) or ‘non display’. Patterns of diversity of these characters were evaluated across 1035 unique species pairs. Display characters were found to diverge rapidly overall, but sympatric species were not found to differ significantly in their ornamental disparity from non-sympatric species, regardless of phylogenetic distance. The prediction of the species recognition hypothesis, and thus the idea that ornamentation evolved as a species recognition mechanism, has no statistical support among known ceratopsians. The Royal Society 2018-03-28 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5897650/ /pubmed/29563271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0312 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Palaeobiology
Knapp, Andrew
Knell, Robert J.
Farke, Andrew A.
Loewen, Mark A.
Hone, David W. E.
Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title_full Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title_fullStr Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title_short Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
title_sort patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolution
topic Palaeobiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0312
work_keys_str_mv AT knappandrew patternsofdivergenceinthemorphologyofceratopsiandinosaurssympatryisnotadriverofornamentevolution
AT knellrobertj patternsofdivergenceinthemorphologyofceratopsiandinosaurssympatryisnotadriverofornamentevolution
AT farkeandrewa patternsofdivergenceinthemorphologyofceratopsiandinosaurssympatryisnotadriverofornamentevolution
AT loewenmarka patternsofdivergenceinthemorphologyofceratopsiandinosaurssympatryisnotadriverofornamentevolution
AT honedavidwe patternsofdivergenceinthemorphologyofceratopsiandinosaurssympatryisnotadriverofornamentevolution