Cargando…

The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Although acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (OXIPN) is frequently regarded to be transient, recent studies have reported prolongation of infusion times, dose reduction and treatment cessation following the first dose of oxaliplatin in quarter of patients. Acute OXIPN is also a well-est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher, Shortland, Peter John, Mahns, David Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4185-0
_version_ 1783314034939920384
author Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher
Shortland, Peter John
Mahns, David Anthony
author_facet Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher
Shortland, Peter John
Mahns, David Anthony
author_sort Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (OXIPN) is frequently regarded to be transient, recent studies have reported prolongation of infusion times, dose reduction and treatment cessation following the first dose of oxaliplatin in quarter of patients. Acute OXIPN is also a well-established risk factor for chronic neuropathy. However, there is underreporting of these parameters during the acute phase (≤ 14 days). This paper systematically reviews the incidence of acute OXIPN and its impact on treatment in the first cycle. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. Published original articles were included if they described details about prevalence of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, comprised of 6211 patients were evaluated. The majority of patients were treated with oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFOX). Most studies used the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria to assess acute neuropathy. Acute neuropathy (Grades 1–4) was the most common event with prevalence ranging from 4–98%, followed by haematological (1.4–81%) and gastrointestinal (1.2–67%) toxicities, respectively. Drug regimens, starting dose of oxaliplatin and neuropathy assessment tools varied across studies. In addition, moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients that received a large dose of oxaliplatin (> 85 mg/m(2)) and/ or combined drugs. The majority of studies did not report the factors affecting acute neuropathy namely the range (minimal) doses required to evoke acute neuropathy, patient and clinical risk factors. In addition, there was no systematic reporting of the number of patients subjected to prolonged infusion, dose reduction, treatment delay and treatment cessation during the acute phase. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneity of studies regarding oxaliplatin starting dose, drug regimen, neuropathy assessment tools and study design, a large number of patients developed acute neuropathy. To develop a better preventive and therapeutic guideline for acute/chronic neuropathy, a prospective study should be conducted in a large cohort of patients in relation to drug regimen, starting/ranges (minimal) of doses producing acute neuropathy, treatment compliance, patient and clinical risk factors using a standardised neuropathy assessment tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5897924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58979242018-04-20 The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher Shortland, Peter John Mahns, David Anthony BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Although acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy (OXIPN) is frequently regarded to be transient, recent studies have reported prolongation of infusion times, dose reduction and treatment cessation following the first dose of oxaliplatin in quarter of patients. Acute OXIPN is also a well-established risk factor for chronic neuropathy. However, there is underreporting of these parameters during the acute phase (≤ 14 days). This paper systematically reviews the incidence of acute OXIPN and its impact on treatment in the first cycle. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. Published original articles were included if they described details about prevalence of oxaliplatin-induced acute neuropathy. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, comprised of 6211 patients were evaluated. The majority of patients were treated with oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil (FOLFOX). Most studies used the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria to assess acute neuropathy. Acute neuropathy (Grades 1–4) was the most common event with prevalence ranging from 4–98%, followed by haematological (1.4–81%) and gastrointestinal (1.2–67%) toxicities, respectively. Drug regimens, starting dose of oxaliplatin and neuropathy assessment tools varied across studies. In addition, moderate to severe toxicities were common in patients that received a large dose of oxaliplatin (> 85 mg/m(2)) and/ or combined drugs. The majority of studies did not report the factors affecting acute neuropathy namely the range (minimal) doses required to evoke acute neuropathy, patient and clinical risk factors. In addition, there was no systematic reporting of the number of patients subjected to prolonged infusion, dose reduction, treatment delay and treatment cessation during the acute phase. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneity of studies regarding oxaliplatin starting dose, drug regimen, neuropathy assessment tools and study design, a large number of patients developed acute neuropathy. To develop a better preventive and therapeutic guideline for acute/chronic neuropathy, a prospective study should be conducted in a large cohort of patients in relation to drug regimen, starting/ranges (minimal) of doses producing acute neuropathy, treatment compliance, patient and clinical risk factors using a standardised neuropathy assessment tool. BioMed Central 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5897924/ /pubmed/29649985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4185-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gebremedhn, Endale Gebreegziabher
Shortland, Peter John
Mahns, David Anthony
The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title_full The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title_fullStr The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title_short The incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
title_sort incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy and its impact on treatment in the first cycle: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4185-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gebremedhnendalegebreegziabher theincidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview
AT shortlandpeterjohn theincidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview
AT mahnsdavidanthony theincidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview
AT gebremedhnendalegebreegziabher incidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview
AT shortlandpeterjohn incidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview
AT mahnsdavidanthony incidenceofacuteoxaliplatininducedneuropathyanditsimpactontreatmentinthefirstcycleasystematicreview