Cargando…
In silico cancer research towards 3R
BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of cancer and other complex diseases requires integrating diverse data sets and algorithms. Intertwining in vivo and in vitro data and in silico models are paramount to overcome intrinsic difficulties given by data complexity. Importantly, this approach also h...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4302-0 |
_version_ | 1783314037056995328 |
---|---|
author | Jean-Quartier, Claire Jeanquartier, Fleur Jurisica, Igor Holzinger, Andreas |
author_facet | Jean-Quartier, Claire Jeanquartier, Fleur Jurisica, Igor Holzinger, Andreas |
author_sort | Jean-Quartier, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of cancer and other complex diseases requires integrating diverse data sets and algorithms. Intertwining in vivo and in vitro data and in silico models are paramount to overcome intrinsic difficulties given by data complexity. Importantly, this approach also helps to uncover underlying molecular mechanisms. Over the years, research has introduced multiple biochemical and computational methods to study the disease, many of which require animal experiments. However, modeling systems and the comparison of cellular processes in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes help to understand specific aspects of uncontrolled cell growth, eventually leading to improved planning of future experiments. According to the principles for humane techniques milestones in alternative animal testing involve in vitro methods such as cell-based models and microfluidic chips, as well as clinical tests of microdosing and imaging. Up-to-date, the range of alternative methods has expanded towards computational approaches, based on the use of information from past in vitro and in vivo experiments. In fact, in silico techniques are often underrated but can be vital to understanding fundamental processes in cancer. They can rival accuracy of biological assays, and they can provide essential focus and direction to reduce experimental cost. MAIN BODY: We give an overview on in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods used in cancer research. Common models as cell-lines, xenografts, or genetically modified rodents reflect relevant pathological processes to a different degree, but can not replicate the full spectrum of human disease. There is an increasing importance of computational biology, advancing from the task of assisting biological analysis with network biology approaches as the basis for understanding a cell’s functional organization up to model building for predictive systems. CONCLUSION: Underlining and extending the in silico approach with respect to the 3Rs for replacement, reduction and refinement will lead cancer research towards efficient and effective precision medicine. Therefore, we suggest refined translational models and testing methods based on integrative analyses and the incorporation of computational biology within cancer research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5897933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58979332018-04-20 In silico cancer research towards 3R Jean-Quartier, Claire Jeanquartier, Fleur Jurisica, Igor Holzinger, Andreas BMC Cancer Debate BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of cancer and other complex diseases requires integrating diverse data sets and algorithms. Intertwining in vivo and in vitro data and in silico models are paramount to overcome intrinsic difficulties given by data complexity. Importantly, this approach also helps to uncover underlying molecular mechanisms. Over the years, research has introduced multiple biochemical and computational methods to study the disease, many of which require animal experiments. However, modeling systems and the comparison of cellular processes in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes help to understand specific aspects of uncontrolled cell growth, eventually leading to improved planning of future experiments. According to the principles for humane techniques milestones in alternative animal testing involve in vitro methods such as cell-based models and microfluidic chips, as well as clinical tests of microdosing and imaging. Up-to-date, the range of alternative methods has expanded towards computational approaches, based on the use of information from past in vitro and in vivo experiments. In fact, in silico techniques are often underrated but can be vital to understanding fundamental processes in cancer. They can rival accuracy of biological assays, and they can provide essential focus and direction to reduce experimental cost. MAIN BODY: We give an overview on in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods used in cancer research. Common models as cell-lines, xenografts, or genetically modified rodents reflect relevant pathological processes to a different degree, but can not replicate the full spectrum of human disease. There is an increasing importance of computational biology, advancing from the task of assisting biological analysis with network biology approaches as the basis for understanding a cell’s functional organization up to model building for predictive systems. CONCLUSION: Underlining and extending the in silico approach with respect to the 3Rs for replacement, reduction and refinement will lead cancer research towards efficient and effective precision medicine. Therefore, we suggest refined translational models and testing methods based on integrative analyses and the incorporation of computational biology within cancer research. BioMed Central 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5897933/ /pubmed/29649981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4302-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Jean-Quartier, Claire Jeanquartier, Fleur Jurisica, Igor Holzinger, Andreas In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title | In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title_full | In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title_fullStr | In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title_full_unstemmed | In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title_short | In silico cancer research towards 3R |
title_sort | in silico cancer research towards 3r |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4302-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeanquartierclaire insilicocancerresearchtowards3r AT jeanquartierfleur insilicocancerresearchtowards3r AT jurisicaigor insilicocancerresearchtowards3r AT holzingerandreas insilicocancerresearchtowards3r |