Cargando…

Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of acupuncture is difficult to demonstrate without a feasible double-blind milieu. Double-blind acupuncture needles have been validated in single session protocols with one or two needles but not been tested in a protocol requiring many needles and repeated sessions. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlaeger, Judith M., Takakura, Nobuari, Yajima, Hiroyoshi, Takayama, Miho, Steffen, Alana D., Gabzdyl, Elizabeth M., Nisi, Robyn A., McGowan Gruber, Kathleen, Bussell, Jason M., Wilkie, Diana J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9
_version_ 1783314037525708800
author Schlaeger, Judith M.
Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
Takayama, Miho
Steffen, Alana D.
Gabzdyl, Elizabeth M.
Nisi, Robyn A.
McGowan Gruber, Kathleen
Bussell, Jason M.
Wilkie, Diana J.
author_facet Schlaeger, Judith M.
Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
Takayama, Miho
Steffen, Alana D.
Gabzdyl, Elizabeth M.
Nisi, Robyn A.
McGowan Gruber, Kathleen
Bussell, Jason M.
Wilkie, Diana J.
author_sort Schlaeger, Judith M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficacy of acupuncture is difficult to demonstrate without a feasible double-blind milieu. Double-blind acupuncture needles have been validated in single session protocols with one or two needles but not been tested in a protocol requiring many needles and repeated sessions. METHODS: We determined the feasibility of a 13-needle, 10-session study protocol. Feasibility focused on (1) enrolling and retaining participants; (2) two acupuncturists accurately implementing a double-blind, multi-needle, multi-session protocol; (3) participants completing measures; and (4) protocol acceptability to participants. In this double-blind randomized controlled pilot study, participants were randomized 1:1 to a penetrating needle group or a skin-touch placebo control group. RESULTS: Six women with vulvodynia (mean age 31.5 ± 8 years; five white, non-Latina, one black/African American) met the eligibility requirements, consented to participation, and were enrolled. All six participants (100%) completed the 10-session study protocol in 5 weeks without missing any treatment sessions. Per observed checklist documented technique, two acupuncturists flawlessly administered the 13-needle, 10-session acupuncture protocol; no needles malfunctioned. Six participants attended all sessions and completed 99% of measurement items. One participant did not like acupuncture (60% acceptability score) and five liked acupuncture (100% acceptability scores); the mean acceptability score was 93.3%. CONCLUSION: Study feasibility was supported. This protocol can be used in a double-blind efficacy trial of acupuncture for vulvodynia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02704234. Registered 30 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5897935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58979352018-04-23 Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study Schlaeger, Judith M. Takakura, Nobuari Yajima, Hiroyoshi Takayama, Miho Steffen, Alana D. Gabzdyl, Elizabeth M. Nisi, Robyn A. McGowan Gruber, Kathleen Bussell, Jason M. Wilkie, Diana J. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Efficacy of acupuncture is difficult to demonstrate without a feasible double-blind milieu. Double-blind acupuncture needles have been validated in single session protocols with one or two needles but not been tested in a protocol requiring many needles and repeated sessions. METHODS: We determined the feasibility of a 13-needle, 10-session study protocol. Feasibility focused on (1) enrolling and retaining participants; (2) two acupuncturists accurately implementing a double-blind, multi-needle, multi-session protocol; (3) participants completing measures; and (4) protocol acceptability to participants. In this double-blind randomized controlled pilot study, participants were randomized 1:1 to a penetrating needle group or a skin-touch placebo control group. RESULTS: Six women with vulvodynia (mean age 31.5 ± 8 years; five white, non-Latina, one black/African American) met the eligibility requirements, consented to participation, and were enrolled. All six participants (100%) completed the 10-session study protocol in 5 weeks without missing any treatment sessions. Per observed checklist documented technique, two acupuncturists flawlessly administered the 13-needle, 10-session acupuncture protocol; no needles malfunctioned. Six participants attended all sessions and completed 99% of measurement items. One participant did not like acupuncture (60% acceptability score) and five liked acupuncture (100% acceptability scores); the mean acceptability score was 93.3%. CONCLUSION: Study feasibility was supported. This protocol can be used in a double-blind efficacy trial of acupuncture for vulvodynia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02704234. Registered 30 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5897935/ /pubmed/29686883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schlaeger, Judith M.
Takakura, Nobuari
Yajima, Hiroyoshi
Takayama, Miho
Steffen, Alana D.
Gabzdyl, Elizabeth M.
Nisi, Robyn A.
McGowan Gruber, Kathleen
Bussell, Jason M.
Wilkie, Diana J.
Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title_full Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title_fullStr Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title_short Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
title_sort double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9
work_keys_str_mv AT schlaegerjudithm doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT takakuranobuari doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT yajimahiroyoshi doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT takayamamiho doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT steffenalanad doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT gabzdylelizabethm doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT nisirobyna doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT mcgowangruberkathleen doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT busselljasonm doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy
AT wilkiedianaj doubleblindacupunctureneedlesamultineedlemultisessionrandomizedfeasibilitystudy