Cargando…

Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods

BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hines, Andrea Green, Freifeld, Alison, Zhao, Xing, Berry, Ann Anderson, Willett, Lynne, Iwen, Peter C., Simonsen, Kari A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z
_version_ 1783314049966014464
author Hines, Andrea Green
Freifeld, Alison
Zhao, Xing
Berry, Ann Anderson
Willett, Lynne
Iwen, Peter C.
Simonsen, Kari A.
author_facet Hines, Andrea Green
Freifeld, Alison
Zhao, Xing
Berry, Ann Anderson
Willett, Lynne
Iwen, Peter C.
Simonsen, Kari A.
author_sort Hines, Andrea Green
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants from the two NICUs affiliated with a single academic medical center were eligible for inclusion. Stool collection was blinded to patient characteristics and occurred during a one week period at each NICU and repeated with a second weeklong collection 6 months later to increase sample size. Stools were tested for C. difficile using EIA (GDH/toxin A/B) with samples testing +/+ or +/− subsequently evaluated by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and by duplex PCR amplification of tcdB and tpi (housekeeping) genes. Cytotoxicity assays were performed on all samples positive for C. difficile by any modality. RESULTS: Eighty-four stools were collected from unique infants for evaluation. EIA results showed 6+/+ [7.1%], 7 +/− [8.3%], and 71 −/− [84.5%] samples. All 6 EIA +/+ were confirmed as toxigenic C. difficile by LAMP; 6/7 EIA +/− were negative by LAMP with one identified as invalid. Duplex PCR concurred with LAMP in all 6 stools positive for toxigenic C. difficile. PCR identified 2 EIA −/− stools positive for tpi, indicating shedding of non-toxigenic C. difficile. Cytotoxicity assay was positive in 4/6 duplex PCR positive samples and negative for all stools that were EIA +/− but negative by molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile blinded point prevalence in infants from two NICUs was 7.1% by molecular methods; and lower than expected based on historical incidence estimates. In house duplex PCR had excellent concordance with clinically available LAMP and EIA tests, and added detection of non-toxigenic C. difficile strain shedding. Evolving NICU care practices may be influencing the composition of infant gut microbiota and reducing the point prevalence of C. difficile shedding in NICU patient stools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58980002018-04-20 Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods Hines, Andrea Green Freifeld, Alison Zhao, Xing Berry, Ann Anderson Willett, Lynne Iwen, Peter C. Simonsen, Kari A. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants from the two NICUs affiliated with a single academic medical center were eligible for inclusion. Stool collection was blinded to patient characteristics and occurred during a one week period at each NICU and repeated with a second weeklong collection 6 months later to increase sample size. Stools were tested for C. difficile using EIA (GDH/toxin A/B) with samples testing +/+ or +/− subsequently evaluated by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and by duplex PCR amplification of tcdB and tpi (housekeeping) genes. Cytotoxicity assays were performed on all samples positive for C. difficile by any modality. RESULTS: Eighty-four stools were collected from unique infants for evaluation. EIA results showed 6+/+ [7.1%], 7 +/− [8.3%], and 71 −/− [84.5%] samples. All 6 EIA +/+ were confirmed as toxigenic C. difficile by LAMP; 6/7 EIA +/− were negative by LAMP with one identified as invalid. Duplex PCR concurred with LAMP in all 6 stools positive for toxigenic C. difficile. PCR identified 2 EIA −/− stools positive for tpi, indicating shedding of non-toxigenic C. difficile. Cytotoxicity assay was positive in 4/6 duplex PCR positive samples and negative for all stools that were EIA +/− but negative by molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile blinded point prevalence in infants from two NICUs was 7.1% by molecular methods; and lower than expected based on historical incidence estimates. In house duplex PCR had excellent concordance with clinically available LAMP and EIA tests, and added detection of non-toxigenic C. difficile strain shedding. Evolving NICU care practices may be influencing the composition of infant gut microbiota and reducing the point prevalence of C. difficile shedding in NICU patient stools. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5898000/ /pubmed/29653526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hines, Andrea Green
Freifeld, Alison
Zhao, Xing
Berry, Ann Anderson
Willett, Lynne
Iwen, Peter C.
Simonsen, Kari A.
Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title_full Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title_fullStr Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title_full_unstemmed Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title_short Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
title_sort clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hinesandreagreen clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT freifeldalison clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT zhaoxing clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT berryannanderson clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT willettlynne clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT iwenpeterc clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods
AT simonsenkaria clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods