Cargando…
Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods
BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z |
_version_ | 1783314049966014464 |
---|---|
author | Hines, Andrea Green Freifeld, Alison Zhao, Xing Berry, Ann Anderson Willett, Lynne Iwen, Peter C. Simonsen, Kari A. |
author_facet | Hines, Andrea Green Freifeld, Alison Zhao, Xing Berry, Ann Anderson Willett, Lynne Iwen, Peter C. Simonsen, Kari A. |
author_sort | Hines, Andrea Green |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants from the two NICUs affiliated with a single academic medical center were eligible for inclusion. Stool collection was blinded to patient characteristics and occurred during a one week period at each NICU and repeated with a second weeklong collection 6 months later to increase sample size. Stools were tested for C. difficile using EIA (GDH/toxin A/B) with samples testing +/+ or +/− subsequently evaluated by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and by duplex PCR amplification of tcdB and tpi (housekeeping) genes. Cytotoxicity assays were performed on all samples positive for C. difficile by any modality. RESULTS: Eighty-four stools were collected from unique infants for evaluation. EIA results showed 6+/+ [7.1%], 7 +/− [8.3%], and 71 −/− [84.5%] samples. All 6 EIA +/+ were confirmed as toxigenic C. difficile by LAMP; 6/7 EIA +/− were negative by LAMP with one identified as invalid. Duplex PCR concurred with LAMP in all 6 stools positive for toxigenic C. difficile. PCR identified 2 EIA −/− stools positive for tpi, indicating shedding of non-toxigenic C. difficile. Cytotoxicity assay was positive in 4/6 duplex PCR positive samples and negative for all stools that were EIA +/− but negative by molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile blinded point prevalence in infants from two NICUs was 7.1% by molecular methods; and lower than expected based on historical incidence estimates. In house duplex PCR had excellent concordance with clinically available LAMP and EIA tests, and added detection of non-toxigenic C. difficile strain shedding. Evolving NICU care practices may be influencing the composition of infant gut microbiota and reducing the point prevalence of C. difficile shedding in NICU patient stools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5898000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58980002018-04-20 Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods Hines, Andrea Green Freifeld, Alison Zhao, Xing Berry, Ann Anderson Willett, Lynne Iwen, Peter C. Simonsen, Kari A. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The point prevalence of Clostridium difficile stool shedding in hospitalized infants from two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined utilizing standard clinical testing compared with duplex PCR to identify toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile strains. METHODS: All infants from the two NICUs affiliated with a single academic medical center were eligible for inclusion. Stool collection was blinded to patient characteristics and occurred during a one week period at each NICU and repeated with a second weeklong collection 6 months later to increase sample size. Stools were tested for C. difficile using EIA (GDH/toxin A/B) with samples testing +/+ or +/− subsequently evaluated by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and by duplex PCR amplification of tcdB and tpi (housekeeping) genes. Cytotoxicity assays were performed on all samples positive for C. difficile by any modality. RESULTS: Eighty-four stools were collected from unique infants for evaluation. EIA results showed 6+/+ [7.1%], 7 +/− [8.3%], and 71 −/− [84.5%] samples. All 6 EIA +/+ were confirmed as toxigenic C. difficile by LAMP; 6/7 EIA +/− were negative by LAMP with one identified as invalid. Duplex PCR concurred with LAMP in all 6 stools positive for toxigenic C. difficile. PCR identified 2 EIA −/− stools positive for tpi, indicating shedding of non-toxigenic C. difficile. Cytotoxicity assay was positive in 4/6 duplex PCR positive samples and negative for all stools that were EIA +/− but negative by molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile blinded point prevalence in infants from two NICUs was 7.1% by molecular methods; and lower than expected based on historical incidence estimates. In house duplex PCR had excellent concordance with clinically available LAMP and EIA tests, and added detection of non-toxigenic C. difficile strain shedding. Evolving NICU care practices may be influencing the composition of infant gut microbiota and reducing the point prevalence of C. difficile shedding in NICU patient stools. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5898000/ /pubmed/29653526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hines, Andrea Green Freifeld, Alison Zhao, Xing Berry, Ann Anderson Willett, Lynne Iwen, Peter C. Simonsen, Kari A. Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title | Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title_full | Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title_fullStr | Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title_short | Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
title_sort | clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1113-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinesandreagreen clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT freifeldalison clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT zhaoxing clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT berryannanderson clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT willettlynne clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT iwenpeterc clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods AT simonsenkaria clostridiumdifficilestoolsheddingininfantshospitalizedintwoneonatalintensivecareunitsislowerthanpreviouspointprevalenceestimatesusingmoleculardiagnosticmethods |