Cargando…
Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study
BACKGROUND: General supportive and preventive measures in the intensive care management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) aim to prevent or limit secondary brain injury and optimize recovery. The aim of this survey was to assess and quantify variation in perceptions on intensive care unit (ICU) manage...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6 |
_version_ | 1783314053242814464 |
---|---|
author | Huijben, Jilske A. Volovici, Victor Cnossen, Maryse C. Haitsma, Iain K. Stocchetti, Nino Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Ercole, Ari Citerio, Giuseppe Nelson, David Polinder, Suzanne Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, Hester F. van der Jagt, Mathieu |
author_facet | Huijben, Jilske A. Volovici, Victor Cnossen, Maryse C. Haitsma, Iain K. Stocchetti, Nino Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Ercole, Ari Citerio, Giuseppe Nelson, David Polinder, Suzanne Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, Hester F. van der Jagt, Mathieu |
author_sort | Huijben, Jilske A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: General supportive and preventive measures in the intensive care management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) aim to prevent or limit secondary brain injury and optimize recovery. The aim of this survey was to assess and quantify variation in perceptions on intensive care unit (ICU) management of patients with TBI in European neurotrauma centers. METHODS: We performed a survey as part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. We analyzed 23 questions focused on: 1) circulatory and respiratory management; 2) fever control; 3) use of corticosteroids; 4) nutrition and glucose management; and 5) seizure prophylaxis and treatment. RESULTS: The survey was completed predominantly by intensivists (n = 33, 50%) and neurosurgeons (n = 23, 35%) from 66 centers (97% response rate). The most common cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target was > 60 mmHg (n = 39, 60%) and/or an individualized target (n = 25, 38%). To support CPP, crystalloid fluid loading (n = 60, 91%) was generally preferred over albumin (n = 15, 23%), and vasopressors (n = 63, 96%) over inotropes (n = 29, 44%). The most commonly reported target of partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO(2)) was 36–40 mmHg (4.8–5.3 kPa) in case of controlled intracranial pressure (ICP) < 20 mmHg (n = 45, 69%) and PaCO(2) target of 30–35 mmHg (4–4.7 kPa) in case of raised ICP (n = 40, 62%). Almost all respondents indicated to generally treat fever (n = 65, 98%) with paracetamol (n = 61, 92%) and/or external cooling (n = 49, 74%). Conventional glucose management (n = 43, 66%) was preferred over tight glycemic control (n = 18, 28%). More than half of the respondents indicated to aim for full caloric replacement within 7 days (n = 43, 66%) using enteral nutrition (n = 60, 92%). Indications for and duration of seizure prophylaxis varied, and levetiracetam was mostly reported as the agent of choice for both seizure prophylaxis (n = 32, 49%) and treatment (n = 40, 61%). CONCLUSIONS: Practice preferences vary substantially regarding general supportive and preventive measures in TBI patients at ICUs of European neurotrauma centers. These results provide an opportunity for future comparative effectiveness research, since a more evidence-based uniformity in good practices in general ICU management could have a major impact on TBI outcome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5898014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58980142018-04-20 Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study Huijben, Jilske A. Volovici, Victor Cnossen, Maryse C. Haitsma, Iain K. Stocchetti, Nino Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Ercole, Ari Citerio, Giuseppe Nelson, David Polinder, Suzanne Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, Hester F. van der Jagt, Mathieu Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: General supportive and preventive measures in the intensive care management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) aim to prevent or limit secondary brain injury and optimize recovery. The aim of this survey was to assess and quantify variation in perceptions on intensive care unit (ICU) management of patients with TBI in European neurotrauma centers. METHODS: We performed a survey as part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. We analyzed 23 questions focused on: 1) circulatory and respiratory management; 2) fever control; 3) use of corticosteroids; 4) nutrition and glucose management; and 5) seizure prophylaxis and treatment. RESULTS: The survey was completed predominantly by intensivists (n = 33, 50%) and neurosurgeons (n = 23, 35%) from 66 centers (97% response rate). The most common cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target was > 60 mmHg (n = 39, 60%) and/or an individualized target (n = 25, 38%). To support CPP, crystalloid fluid loading (n = 60, 91%) was generally preferred over albumin (n = 15, 23%), and vasopressors (n = 63, 96%) over inotropes (n = 29, 44%). The most commonly reported target of partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO(2)) was 36–40 mmHg (4.8–5.3 kPa) in case of controlled intracranial pressure (ICP) < 20 mmHg (n = 45, 69%) and PaCO(2) target of 30–35 mmHg (4–4.7 kPa) in case of raised ICP (n = 40, 62%). Almost all respondents indicated to generally treat fever (n = 65, 98%) with paracetamol (n = 61, 92%) and/or external cooling (n = 49, 74%). Conventional glucose management (n = 43, 66%) was preferred over tight glycemic control (n = 18, 28%). More than half of the respondents indicated to aim for full caloric replacement within 7 days (n = 43, 66%) using enteral nutrition (n = 60, 92%). Indications for and duration of seizure prophylaxis varied, and levetiracetam was mostly reported as the agent of choice for both seizure prophylaxis (n = 32, 49%) and treatment (n = 40, 61%). CONCLUSIONS: Practice preferences vary substantially regarding general supportive and preventive measures in TBI patients at ICUs of European neurotrauma centers. These results provide an opportunity for future comparative effectiveness research, since a more evidence-based uniformity in good practices in general ICU management could have a major impact on TBI outcome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5898014/ /pubmed/29650049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Huijben, Jilske A. Volovici, Victor Cnossen, Maryse C. Haitsma, Iain K. Stocchetti, Nino Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Ercole, Ari Citerio, Giuseppe Nelson, David Polinder, Suzanne Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, Hester F. van der Jagt, Mathieu Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title | Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title_full | Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title_fullStr | Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title_short | Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study |
title_sort | variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the collaborative european neurotrauma effectiveness research in traumatic brain injury (center-tbi) study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huijbenjilskea variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT volovicivictor variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT cnossenmarysec variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT haitsmaiaink variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT stocchettinino variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT maasandrewir variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT menondavidk variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT ercoleari variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT citeriogiuseppe variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT nelsondavid variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT polindersuzanne variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT steyerbergewoutw variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT lingsmahesterf variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT vanderjagtmathieu variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy AT variationingeneralsupportiveandpreventiveintensivecaremanagementoftraumaticbraininjuryasurveyin66neurotraumacentersparticipatinginthecollaborativeeuropeanneurotraumaeffectivenessresearchintraumaticbraininjurycentertbistudy |