Cargando…

Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study

BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehmert, Christoph, Verrender, Adam, Pauli, Mario, Wiedemann, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y
_version_ 1783314054626934784
author Boehmert, Christoph
Verrender, Adam
Pauli, Mario
Wiedemann, Peter
author_facet Boehmert, Christoph
Verrender, Adam
Pauli, Mario
Wiedemann, Peter
author_sort Boehmert, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further, the current study investigates whether precautionary information also leads to higher symptom perceptions in an alleged exposure situation. Building on existing research on nocebo responses to sham electromagnetic fields, an interaction of the precautionary information with personality characteristics was hypothesised. METHODS: An experimental design with sham exposure to an electromagnetic field of a WLAN device was deployed. The final sample is constituted by N = 137 participants. Participants received either only basic information about the safety of current WLAN exposure limits or in addition also precautionary information (e.g. ‘prefer wired connections if wireless technology can be relinquished’). Subsequently, symptoms and other variables were assessed before and after sham exposure to a WLAN electromagnetic field. RESULTS: Results are not in favour of the hypothesised effects. There was neither a main effect of precautionary information, nor were there any of the hypothesised interaction effects of precautionary information and personality characteristics on perceived symptoms under sham exposure. Exploratory analyses highlight the role of prior risk perception as a predictor of nocebo responses, and of symptom expectations as a mediator between these two variables. CONCLUSIONS: As the statistical power to detect even small effects was relatively high, we interpret this as a robust indication that precautionary information does not lead to increased nocebo responses by itself. The implications for health authorities´ communication with the public are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58980202018-04-20 Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study Boehmert, Christoph Verrender, Adam Pauli, Mario Wiedemann, Peter Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further, the current study investigates whether precautionary information also leads to higher symptom perceptions in an alleged exposure situation. Building on existing research on nocebo responses to sham electromagnetic fields, an interaction of the precautionary information with personality characteristics was hypothesised. METHODS: An experimental design with sham exposure to an electromagnetic field of a WLAN device was deployed. The final sample is constituted by N = 137 participants. Participants received either only basic information about the safety of current WLAN exposure limits or in addition also precautionary information (e.g. ‘prefer wired connections if wireless technology can be relinquished’). Subsequently, symptoms and other variables were assessed before and after sham exposure to a WLAN electromagnetic field. RESULTS: Results are not in favour of the hypothesised effects. There was neither a main effect of precautionary information, nor were there any of the hypothesised interaction effects of precautionary information and personality characteristics on perceived symptoms under sham exposure. Exploratory analyses highlight the role of prior risk perception as a predictor of nocebo responses, and of symptom expectations as a mediator between these two variables. CONCLUSIONS: As the statistical power to detect even small effects was relatively high, we interpret this as a robust indication that precautionary information does not lead to increased nocebo responses by itself. The implications for health authorities´ communication with the public are discussed. BioMed Central 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5898020/ /pubmed/29650009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Boehmert, Christoph
Verrender, Adam
Pauli, Mario
Wiedemann, Peter
Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title_full Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title_fullStr Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title_full_unstemmed Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title_short Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
title_sort does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? an experimental risk communication study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmertchristoph doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy
AT verrenderadam doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy
AT paulimario doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy
AT wiedemannpeter doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy