Cargando…
Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study
BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y |
_version_ | 1783314054626934784 |
---|---|
author | Boehmert, Christoph Verrender, Adam Pauli, Mario Wiedemann, Peter |
author_facet | Boehmert, Christoph Verrender, Adam Pauli, Mario Wiedemann, Peter |
author_sort | Boehmert, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further, the current study investigates whether precautionary information also leads to higher symptom perceptions in an alleged exposure situation. Building on existing research on nocebo responses to sham electromagnetic fields, an interaction of the precautionary information with personality characteristics was hypothesised. METHODS: An experimental design with sham exposure to an electromagnetic field of a WLAN device was deployed. The final sample is constituted by N = 137 participants. Participants received either only basic information about the safety of current WLAN exposure limits or in addition also precautionary information (e.g. ‘prefer wired connections if wireless technology can be relinquished’). Subsequently, symptoms and other variables were assessed before and after sham exposure to a WLAN electromagnetic field. RESULTS: Results are not in favour of the hypothesised effects. There was neither a main effect of precautionary information, nor were there any of the hypothesised interaction effects of precautionary information and personality characteristics on perceived symptoms under sham exposure. Exploratory analyses highlight the role of prior risk perception as a predictor of nocebo responses, and of symptom expectations as a mediator between these two variables. CONCLUSIONS: As the statistical power to detect even small effects was relatively high, we interpret this as a robust indication that precautionary information does not lead to increased nocebo responses by itself. The implications for health authorities´ communication with the public are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5898020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58980202018-04-20 Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study Boehmert, Christoph Verrender, Adam Pauli, Mario Wiedemann, Peter Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further, the current study investigates whether precautionary information also leads to higher symptom perceptions in an alleged exposure situation. Building on existing research on nocebo responses to sham electromagnetic fields, an interaction of the precautionary information with personality characteristics was hypothesised. METHODS: An experimental design with sham exposure to an electromagnetic field of a WLAN device was deployed. The final sample is constituted by N = 137 participants. Participants received either only basic information about the safety of current WLAN exposure limits or in addition also precautionary information (e.g. ‘prefer wired connections if wireless technology can be relinquished’). Subsequently, symptoms and other variables were assessed before and after sham exposure to a WLAN electromagnetic field. RESULTS: Results are not in favour of the hypothesised effects. There was neither a main effect of precautionary information, nor were there any of the hypothesised interaction effects of precautionary information and personality characteristics on perceived symptoms under sham exposure. Exploratory analyses highlight the role of prior risk perception as a predictor of nocebo responses, and of symptom expectations as a mediator between these two variables. CONCLUSIONS: As the statistical power to detect even small effects was relatively high, we interpret this as a robust indication that precautionary information does not lead to increased nocebo responses by itself. The implications for health authorities´ communication with the public are discussed. BioMed Central 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5898020/ /pubmed/29650009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Boehmert, Christoph Verrender, Adam Pauli, Mario Wiedemann, Peter Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title | Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title_full | Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title_fullStr | Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title_short | Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study |
title_sort | does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? an experimental risk communication study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29650009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boehmertchristoph doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy AT verrenderadam doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy AT paulimario doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy AT wiedemannpeter doesprecautionaryinformationaboutelectromagneticfieldstriggernoceboresponsesanexperimentalriskcommunicationstudy |