Cargando…

Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for 30% of all healthcare-associated infections, with reported rates ranging from 8% and 30% after colorectal surgery and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospital stay and costs in healthcare. Administration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vignaud, Marie, Paugam-Burtz, Catherine, Garot, Matthias, Jaber, Samir, Slim, Karem, Panis, Yves, Lucet, Jean-Christophe, Bourdier, Justine, Morand, Dominique, Pereira, Bruno, Futier, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020254
_version_ 1783314111941050368
author Vignaud, Marie
Paugam-Burtz, Catherine
Garot, Matthias
Jaber, Samir
Slim, Karem
Panis, Yves
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Futier, Emmanuel
author_facet Vignaud, Marie
Paugam-Burtz, Catherine
Garot, Matthias
Jaber, Samir
Slim, Karem
Panis, Yves
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Futier, Emmanuel
author_sort Vignaud, Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for 30% of all healthcare-associated infections, with reported rates ranging from 8% and 30% after colorectal surgery and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospital stay and costs in healthcare. Administration of systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis before surgery is recommended to reduce the risk of SSI, but the optimal regimen remains unclear. We aim to evaluate whether a combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis could be more effective to reduce the incidence of SSI after colorectal surgery, as compared with the standard practice of intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) trial is a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel, double-blind, multicentre study of 960 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis or intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis alone, stratified by centre, the surgical procedure (laparoscopic or open surgery) and according to the surgical skin antisepsis (chlorexidine–alcohol or povidione-iodine alcoholic solution). The primary endpoint is the rate of SSI by day 30 following surgery, with SSI defined by the criteria developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle and a per-protocol basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: COMBINE trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Participant recruitment began in May 2016. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2015-002559-84; NCT02618720.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58983202018-04-16 Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial Vignaud, Marie Paugam-Burtz, Catherine Garot, Matthias Jaber, Samir Slim, Karem Panis, Yves Lucet, Jean-Christophe Bourdier, Justine Morand, Dominique Pereira, Bruno Futier, Emmanuel BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for 30% of all healthcare-associated infections, with reported rates ranging from 8% and 30% after colorectal surgery and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospital stay and costs in healthcare. Administration of systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis before surgery is recommended to reduce the risk of SSI, but the optimal regimen remains unclear. We aim to evaluate whether a combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis could be more effective to reduce the incidence of SSI after colorectal surgery, as compared with the standard practice of intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) trial is a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel, double-blind, multicentre study of 960 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis or intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis alone, stratified by centre, the surgical procedure (laparoscopic or open surgery) and according to the surgical skin antisepsis (chlorexidine–alcohol or povidione-iodine alcoholic solution). The primary endpoint is the rate of SSI by day 30 following surgery, with SSI defined by the criteria developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle and a per-protocol basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: COMBINE trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Participant recruitment began in May 2016. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2015-002559-84; NCT02618720. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5898320/ /pubmed/29654027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020254 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Vignaud, Marie
Paugam-Burtz, Catherine
Garot, Matthias
Jaber, Samir
Slim, Karem
Panis, Yves
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Futier, Emmanuel
Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (combine) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020254
work_keys_str_mv AT vignaudmarie comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT paugamburtzcatherine comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT garotmatthias comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT jabersamir comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT slimkarem comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT panisyves comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT lucetjeanchristophe comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT bourdierjustine comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT moranddominique comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT pereirabruno comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT futieremmanuel comparisonofintravenousversuscombinedoralandintravenousantimicrobialprophylaxiscombineforthepreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectioninelectivecolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial