Cargando…

Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nichols, Elizabeth, O’Hara, Nathan N, Degani, Yasmin, Sprague, Sheila A, Adachi, Jonathan D, Bhandari, Mohit, Holick, Michael F, Connelly, Daniel W, Slobogean, Gerard P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685
_version_ 1783314114751234048
author Nichols, Elizabeth
O’Hara, Nathan N
Degani, Yasmin
Sprague, Sheila A
Adachi, Jonathan D
Bhandari, Mohit
Holick, Michael F
Connelly, Daniel W
Slobogean, Gerard P
author_facet Nichols, Elizabeth
O’Hara, Nathan N
Degani, Yasmin
Sprague, Sheila A
Adachi, Jonathan D
Bhandari, Mohit
Holick, Michael F
Connelly, Daniel W
Slobogean, Gerard P
author_sort Nichols, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this study was to determine patient preferences for fracture healing relative to hypothetical vitamin D supplementation dosing options. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 199 adult (18–60 years) patients with a fracture. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameter estimates of utility for fracture healing relative to dosing regimens were analysed using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. RESULTS: A reduced risk of reoperation (34.3%) and reduced healing time (24.4%) were the attributes of greatest relative importance. The highest mean utility estimates were for a one-time supplementation dose (ß=0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.00) followed by a reduced risk of reoperation (ß=0.41 per absolute % reduction, 95% CI 0.0.36 to 0.46). Supplementation for 24 weeks in duration (ß=−0.83, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.67) and a daily supplement (ß=−0.29, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.11) had the lowest mean utilities. The ‘no supplement’ option had a large negative value suggesting supplementation was generally desirable in this sample population. Among other possible clinical scenarios, patients expected a 2% reduction in the absolute risk of reoperation or a 3.1-week reduction in healing time from the baseline to accept a treatment regimen requiring two separate doses of supplementation, two blood tests and a cost of $20 within 3 months of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with orthopaedic trauma demonstrated strong willingness to take a vitamin D supplement that would decrease risk of reoperation and reduce healing time. Furthermore, these findings specify the required decrease in reoperation risk and reduction in healing time patients would expect to adhere to possible vitamin D dosing regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58983322018-04-16 Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment Nichols, Elizabeth O’Hara, Nathan N Degani, Yasmin Sprague, Sheila A Adachi, Jonathan D Bhandari, Mohit Holick, Michael F Connelly, Daniel W Slobogean, Gerard P BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this study was to determine patient preferences for fracture healing relative to hypothetical vitamin D supplementation dosing options. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 199 adult (18–60 years) patients with a fracture. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameter estimates of utility for fracture healing relative to dosing regimens were analysed using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. RESULTS: A reduced risk of reoperation (34.3%) and reduced healing time (24.4%) were the attributes of greatest relative importance. The highest mean utility estimates were for a one-time supplementation dose (ß=0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.00) followed by a reduced risk of reoperation (ß=0.41 per absolute % reduction, 95% CI 0.0.36 to 0.46). Supplementation for 24 weeks in duration (ß=−0.83, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.67) and a daily supplement (ß=−0.29, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.11) had the lowest mean utilities. The ‘no supplement’ option had a large negative value suggesting supplementation was generally desirable in this sample population. Among other possible clinical scenarios, patients expected a 2% reduction in the absolute risk of reoperation or a 3.1-week reduction in healing time from the baseline to accept a treatment regimen requiring two separate doses of supplementation, two blood tests and a cost of $20 within 3 months of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with orthopaedic trauma demonstrated strong willingness to take a vitamin D supplement that would decrease risk of reoperation and reduce healing time. Furthermore, these findings specify the required decrease in reoperation risk and reduction in healing time patients would expect to adhere to possible vitamin D dosing regimens. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5898332/ /pubmed/29654012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Nichols, Elizabeth
O’Hara, Nathan N
Degani, Yasmin
Sprague, Sheila A
Adachi, Jonathan D
Bhandari, Mohit
Holick, Michael F
Connelly, Daniel W
Slobogean, Gerard P
Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title_full Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title_short Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
title_sort patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholselizabeth patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT oharanathann patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT deganiyasmin patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT spraguesheilaa patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT adachijonathand patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT bhandarimohit patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT holickmichaelf patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT connellydanielw patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT slobogeangerardp patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment