Cargando…
Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment
OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685 |
_version_ | 1783314114751234048 |
---|---|
author | Nichols, Elizabeth O’Hara, Nathan N Degani, Yasmin Sprague, Sheila A Adachi, Jonathan D Bhandari, Mohit Holick, Michael F Connelly, Daniel W Slobogean, Gerard P |
author_facet | Nichols, Elizabeth O’Hara, Nathan N Degani, Yasmin Sprague, Sheila A Adachi, Jonathan D Bhandari, Mohit Holick, Michael F Connelly, Daniel W Slobogean, Gerard P |
author_sort | Nichols, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this study was to determine patient preferences for fracture healing relative to hypothetical vitamin D supplementation dosing options. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 199 adult (18–60 years) patients with a fracture. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameter estimates of utility for fracture healing relative to dosing regimens were analysed using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. RESULTS: A reduced risk of reoperation (34.3%) and reduced healing time (24.4%) were the attributes of greatest relative importance. The highest mean utility estimates were for a one-time supplementation dose (ß=0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.00) followed by a reduced risk of reoperation (ß=0.41 per absolute % reduction, 95% CI 0.0.36 to 0.46). Supplementation for 24 weeks in duration (ß=−0.83, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.67) and a daily supplement (ß=−0.29, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.11) had the lowest mean utilities. The ‘no supplement’ option had a large negative value suggesting supplementation was generally desirable in this sample population. Among other possible clinical scenarios, patients expected a 2% reduction in the absolute risk of reoperation or a 3.1-week reduction in healing time from the baseline to accept a treatment regimen requiring two separate doses of supplementation, two blood tests and a cost of $20 within 3 months of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with orthopaedic trauma demonstrated strong willingness to take a vitamin D supplement that would decrease risk of reoperation and reduce healing time. Furthermore, these findings specify the required decrease in reoperation risk and reduction in healing time patients would expect to adhere to possible vitamin D dosing regimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5898332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58983322018-04-16 Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment Nichols, Elizabeth O’Hara, Nathan N Degani, Yasmin Sprague, Sheila A Adachi, Jonathan D Bhandari, Mohit Holick, Michael F Connelly, Daniel W Slobogean, Gerard P BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is often prescribed as an adjuvant therapy to aid fracture healing due to its biological role in bone health. However, the optimal frequency, dosage and duration of vitamin D supplementation for non-osteoporotic fracture healing has not been established. The objective of this study was to determine patient preferences for fracture healing relative to hypothetical vitamin D supplementation dosing options. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 199 adult (18–60 years) patients with a fracture. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameter estimates of utility for fracture healing relative to dosing regimens were analysed using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. RESULTS: A reduced risk of reoperation (34.3%) and reduced healing time (24.4%) were the attributes of greatest relative importance. The highest mean utility estimates were for a one-time supplementation dose (ß=0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.00) followed by a reduced risk of reoperation (ß=0.41 per absolute % reduction, 95% CI 0.0.36 to 0.46). Supplementation for 24 weeks in duration (ß=−0.83, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.67) and a daily supplement (ß=−0.29, 95% CI −0.47 to −0.11) had the lowest mean utilities. The ‘no supplement’ option had a large negative value suggesting supplementation was generally desirable in this sample population. Among other possible clinical scenarios, patients expected a 2% reduction in the absolute risk of reoperation or a 3.1-week reduction in healing time from the baseline to accept a treatment regimen requiring two separate doses of supplementation, two blood tests and a cost of $20 within 3 months of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with orthopaedic trauma demonstrated strong willingness to take a vitamin D supplement that would decrease risk of reoperation and reduce healing time. Furthermore, these findings specify the required decrease in reoperation risk and reduction in healing time patients would expect to adhere to possible vitamin D dosing regimens. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5898332/ /pubmed/29654012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Surgery Nichols, Elizabeth O’Hara, Nathan N Degani, Yasmin Sprague, Sheila A Adachi, Jonathan D Bhandari, Mohit Holick, Michael F Connelly, Daniel W Slobogean, Gerard P Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title | Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title_full | Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title_fullStr | Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title_short | Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
title_sort | patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicholselizabeth patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT oharanathann patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT deganiyasmin patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT spraguesheilaa patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT adachijonathand patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT bhandarimohit patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT holickmichaelf patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT connellydanielw patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT slobogeangerardp patientpreferencesfornutritionalsupplementationtoimprovefracturehealingadiscretechoiceexperiment |