Cargando…

Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue

An extraordinary claim was made by one of the leading researchers within positive psychology, namely, there is a universal–invariant ratio between positive to negative emotions that serves as a unique tipping point between flourishing and languishing in individuals, marriages, organizations, and oth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedman, Harris L., Brown, Nicholas J. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167818762227
_version_ 1783314124959121408
author Friedman, Harris L.
Brown, Nicholas J. L.
author_facet Friedman, Harris L.
Brown, Nicholas J. L.
author_sort Friedman, Harris L.
collection PubMed
description An extraordinary claim was made by one of the leading researchers within positive psychology, namely, there is a universal–invariant ratio between positive to negative emotions that serves as a unique tipping point between flourishing and languishing in individuals, marriages, organizations, and other human systems across all cultures and times. Known as the “critical positivity ratio,” this finding was supposedly derived from the famous Lorenz equation in physics by using the mathematics of nonlinear dynamic systems, and was defined precisely as “2.9013.” This exact number was widely touted as a great discovery by many leaders of positive psychology, had tremendous impact in various applied areas of psychology, and, more broadly, and was extensively cited in both the scientific literature and in the global popular media. However, this finding has been demonstrated to be bogus. Since its advent as a relatively new subdiscipline, positive psychology has claimed superiority to its precursor, the subdiscipline of humanistic psychology, in terms of supposedly both using more rigorous science and avoiding popularizing nonsense. The debunking of the critical positivity ratio demonstrates that positive psychology did not live up to these claims, and this has important implications, which are discussed in terms of “romantic scientism” and “voodoo science.” In addition, articles in the special issue on the “Implications of Debunking the ‘Critical Positivity Ratio’ for Humanistic Psychology” are introduced, as they also delve into these concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58984192018-04-25 Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue Friedman, Harris L. Brown, Nicholas J. L. J Humanist Psychol Article An extraordinary claim was made by one of the leading researchers within positive psychology, namely, there is a universal–invariant ratio between positive to negative emotions that serves as a unique tipping point between flourishing and languishing in individuals, marriages, organizations, and other human systems across all cultures and times. Known as the “critical positivity ratio,” this finding was supposedly derived from the famous Lorenz equation in physics by using the mathematics of nonlinear dynamic systems, and was defined precisely as “2.9013.” This exact number was widely touted as a great discovery by many leaders of positive psychology, had tremendous impact in various applied areas of psychology, and, more broadly, and was extensively cited in both the scientific literature and in the global popular media. However, this finding has been demonstrated to be bogus. Since its advent as a relatively new subdiscipline, positive psychology has claimed superiority to its precursor, the subdiscipline of humanistic psychology, in terms of supposedly both using more rigorous science and avoiding popularizing nonsense. The debunking of the critical positivity ratio demonstrates that positive psychology did not live up to these claims, and this has important implications, which are discussed in terms of “romantic scientism” and “voodoo science.” In addition, articles in the special issue on the “Implications of Debunking the ‘Critical Positivity Ratio’ for Humanistic Psychology” are introduced, as they also delve into these concerns. SAGE Publications 2018-03-29 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5898419/ /pubmed/29706664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167818762227 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Friedman, Harris L.
Brown, Nicholas J. L.
Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title_full Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title_fullStr Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title_short Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue
title_sort implications of debunking the “critical positivity ratio” for humanistic psychology: introduction to special issue
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167818762227
work_keys_str_mv AT friedmanharrisl implicationsofdebunkingthecriticalpositivityratioforhumanisticpsychologyintroductiontospecialissue
AT brownnicholasjl implicationsofdebunkingthecriticalpositivityratioforhumanisticpsychologyintroductiontospecialissue