Cargando…

Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency leading to loss of corneal clarity, potential vision loss, pain, photophobia, and keratoplasty failure cannot be treated by autologous limbal transplantation, and allogeneic limbal transplantation requires subsequent immunosuppressive treatment. Cultured a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rovere, Marie-Rose, Rousselle, Patricia, Haftek, Marek, Charleux, Bruce, Kocaba, Viridiana, Auxenfans, Céline, Nataf, Serge, Damour, Odile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689717741140
_version_ 1783314169141919744
author Rovere, Marie-Rose
Rousselle, Patricia
Haftek, Marek
Charleux, Bruce
Kocaba, Viridiana
Auxenfans, Céline
Nataf, Serge
Damour, Odile
author_facet Rovere, Marie-Rose
Rousselle, Patricia
Haftek, Marek
Charleux, Bruce
Kocaba, Viridiana
Auxenfans, Céline
Nataf, Serge
Damour, Odile
author_sort Rovere, Marie-Rose
collection PubMed
description Total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency leading to loss of corneal clarity, potential vision loss, pain, photophobia, and keratoplasty failure cannot be treated by autologous limbal transplantation, and allogeneic limbal transplantation requires subsequent immunosuppressive treatment. Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells have been shown to be safe and effective alternatives. These cells can be transplanted on supports or without support after detachment from the culture dishes. Dispase, known for epidermal sheet detachment, is reported as not usable for oral mucosa. The objective was to find an optimized detachment method providing a sufficiently resistant and adhesive cultured oral mucosal epithelium (COME), which can be grafted without sutures. Enzymatic treatments (dispase or collagenase at different concentrations) were compared to enzyme-free mechanical detachment. Histological immunofluorescence (IF) and Western blotting (WB) were used to examine the impact on adhesion markers (laminin-332, β1-integrin, and type VII collagen) and junctional markers (E-cadherin, P-cadherin). Finally, the COME ability to adhere to the cornea and produce a differentiated epithelium 15 d after grafting onto an ex vivo porcine stroma model were investigated by histology, IF, and transmission electron microscopy. Collagenase at 0.5 mg/mL and dispase at 5 mg/mL were selected for comparative study on adhesive expression marker by IF and WB showed that levels of basement membrane proteins and cell–cell and cell–matrix junction proteins were not significantly different between the 3 detachment methods. Collagenase 0.5 mg/mL was selected for the next step validation because of the better reproducibility, 100% success (vs. 33% with dispase 5 mg/mL). Grafted onto porcine de-epithelialized corneal stroma, collagenase 0.5 mg/mL detached COME were found to adhere, stratify, and continue to ensure renewal of the epithelium. For COME, collagenase 0.5 mg/mL enzymatic detachment was selected and validated on its resistance and adhesive marker expression as well as their anchorage onto our new ex vivo de-epithelialized stroma model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58986902018-04-19 Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Rovere, Marie-Rose Rousselle, Patricia Haftek, Marek Charleux, Bruce Kocaba, Viridiana Auxenfans, Céline Nataf, Serge Damour, Odile Cell Transplant Original Articles Total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency leading to loss of corneal clarity, potential vision loss, pain, photophobia, and keratoplasty failure cannot be treated by autologous limbal transplantation, and allogeneic limbal transplantation requires subsequent immunosuppressive treatment. Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells have been shown to be safe and effective alternatives. These cells can be transplanted on supports or without support after detachment from the culture dishes. Dispase, known for epidermal sheet detachment, is reported as not usable for oral mucosa. The objective was to find an optimized detachment method providing a sufficiently resistant and adhesive cultured oral mucosal epithelium (COME), which can be grafted without sutures. Enzymatic treatments (dispase or collagenase at different concentrations) were compared to enzyme-free mechanical detachment. Histological immunofluorescence (IF) and Western blotting (WB) were used to examine the impact on adhesion markers (laminin-332, β1-integrin, and type VII collagen) and junctional markers (E-cadherin, P-cadherin). Finally, the COME ability to adhere to the cornea and produce a differentiated epithelium 15 d after grafting onto an ex vivo porcine stroma model were investigated by histology, IF, and transmission electron microscopy. Collagenase at 0.5 mg/mL and dispase at 5 mg/mL were selected for comparative study on adhesive expression marker by IF and WB showed that levels of basement membrane proteins and cell–cell and cell–matrix junction proteins were not significantly different between the 3 detachment methods. Collagenase 0.5 mg/mL was selected for the next step validation because of the better reproducibility, 100% success (vs. 33% with dispase 5 mg/mL). Grafted onto porcine de-epithelialized corneal stroma, collagenase 0.5 mg/mL detached COME were found to adhere, stratify, and continue to ensure renewal of the epithelium. For COME, collagenase 0.5 mg/mL enzymatic detachment was selected and validated on its resistance and adhesive marker expression as well as their anchorage onto our new ex vivo de-epithelialized stroma model. SAGE Publications 2018-04-11 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5898690/ /pubmed/29637812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689717741140 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rovere, Marie-Rose
Rousselle, Patricia
Haftek, Marek
Charleux, Bruce
Kocaba, Viridiana
Auxenfans, Céline
Nataf, Serge
Damour, Odile
Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title_full Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title_fullStr Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title_short Preserving Basement Membranes during Detachment of Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets for the Treatment of Total Bilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
title_sort preserving basement membranes during detachment of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets for the treatment of total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29637812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689717741140
work_keys_str_mv AT roveremarierose preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT roussellepatricia preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT haftekmarek preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT charleuxbruce preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT kocabaviridiana preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT auxenfansceline preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT natafserge preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency
AT damourodile preservingbasementmembranesduringdetachmentofcultivatedoralmucosalepithelialcellsheetsforthetreatmentoftotalbilaterallimbalstemcelldeficiency