Cargando…

Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system

PURPOSE: The study aimed to develop a motion capture system that can track, visualize, and analyze the entire performance of self-injection with the auto-injector. METHODS: Each of nine healthy subjects and 29 rheumatoid arthritic (RA) patients with different degrees of hand disability performed two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Xiao, Li, Wei, Clawson, Corbin, Karvani, David, Sondag, Perceval, Hahn, James K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674844
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S160394
_version_ 1783314200922161152
author Xiao, Xiao
Li, Wei
Clawson, Corbin
Karvani, David
Sondag, Perceval
Hahn, James K
author_facet Xiao, Xiao
Li, Wei
Clawson, Corbin
Karvani, David
Sondag, Perceval
Hahn, James K
author_sort Xiao, Xiao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aimed to develop a motion capture system that can track, visualize, and analyze the entire performance of self-injection with the auto-injector. METHODS: Each of nine healthy subjects and 29 rheumatoid arthritic (RA) patients with different degrees of hand disability performed two simulated injections into an injection pad while six degrees of freedom (DOF) motions of the auto-injector and the injection pad were captured. We quantitatively measured the performance of the injection by calculating needle displacement from the motion trajectories. The max, mean, and SD of needle displacement were analyzed. Assessments of device acceptance and usability were evaluated by a survey questionnaire and independent observations of compliance with the device instruction for use (IFU). RESULTS: A total of 80 simulated injections were performed. Our results showed a similar level of performance among all the subjects with slightly larger, but not statistically significant, needle displacement in the RA group. In particular, no significant effects regarding previous experience in self-injection, grip method, pain in hand, and Cochin score in the RA group were found to have an impact on the mean needle displacement. Moreover, the analysis of needle displacement for different durations of injections indicated that most of the subjects reached their personal maximum displacement in 15 seconds and remained steady or exhibited a small amount of increase from 15 to 60 seconds. Device acceptance was high for most of the questions (ie, >4; >80%) based on a 0–5-point scale or percentage of acceptance. The overall compliance with the device IFU was high for the first injection (96.05%) and reached 98.02% for the second injection. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of tracking the motions of injection to measure the performance of simulated self-injection. The comparisons of needle displacement showed that even RA patients with severe hand disability could properly perform self-injection with this auto-injector at a similar level with the healthy subjects. Finally, the observed high device acceptance and compliance with device IFU suggest that the system is convenient and easy to use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5898887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58988872018-04-19 Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system Xiao, Xiao Li, Wei Clawson, Corbin Karvani, David Sondag, Perceval Hahn, James K Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: The study aimed to develop a motion capture system that can track, visualize, and analyze the entire performance of self-injection with the auto-injector. METHODS: Each of nine healthy subjects and 29 rheumatoid arthritic (RA) patients with different degrees of hand disability performed two simulated injections into an injection pad while six degrees of freedom (DOF) motions of the auto-injector and the injection pad were captured. We quantitatively measured the performance of the injection by calculating needle displacement from the motion trajectories. The max, mean, and SD of needle displacement were analyzed. Assessments of device acceptance and usability were evaluated by a survey questionnaire and independent observations of compliance with the device instruction for use (IFU). RESULTS: A total of 80 simulated injections were performed. Our results showed a similar level of performance among all the subjects with slightly larger, but not statistically significant, needle displacement in the RA group. In particular, no significant effects regarding previous experience in self-injection, grip method, pain in hand, and Cochin score in the RA group were found to have an impact on the mean needle displacement. Moreover, the analysis of needle displacement for different durations of injections indicated that most of the subjects reached their personal maximum displacement in 15 seconds and remained steady or exhibited a small amount of increase from 15 to 60 seconds. Device acceptance was high for most of the questions (ie, >4; >80%) based on a 0–5-point scale or percentage of acceptance. The overall compliance with the device IFU was high for the first injection (96.05%) and reached 98.02% for the second injection. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of tracking the motions of injection to measure the performance of simulated self-injection. The comparisons of needle displacement showed that even RA patients with severe hand disability could properly perform self-injection with this auto-injector at a similar level with the healthy subjects. Finally, the observed high device acceptance and compliance with device IFU suggest that the system is convenient and easy to use. Dove Medical Press 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5898887/ /pubmed/29674844 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S160394 Text en © 2018 Xiao et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xiao, Xiao
Li, Wei
Clawson, Corbin
Karvani, David
Sondag, Perceval
Hahn, James K
Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title_full Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title_fullStr Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title_short Evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
title_sort evaluation of performance, acceptance, and compliance of an auto-injector in healthy and rheumatoid arthritic subjects measured by a motion capture system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674844
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S160394
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoxiao evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem
AT liwei evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem
AT clawsoncorbin evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem
AT karvanidavid evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem
AT sondagperceval evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem
AT hahnjamesk evaluationofperformanceacceptanceandcomplianceofanautoinjectorinhealthyandrheumatoidarthriticsubjectsmeasuredbyamotioncapturesystem