Cargando…

Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review

BACKGROUND: Community engagement is increasingly seen as crucial to achieving high quality, efficient and collaborative care. However, organisations are still searching for the best and most effective ways to engage citizens in the shaping of health and care services. This review highlights the barr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Weger, E., Van Vooren, N., Luijkx, K. G., Baan, C. A., Drewes, H. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
_version_ 1783314262772416512
author De Weger, E.
Van Vooren, N.
Luijkx, K. G.
Baan, C. A.
Drewes, H. W.
author_facet De Weger, E.
Van Vooren, N.
Luijkx, K. G.
Baan, C. A.
Drewes, H. W.
author_sort De Weger, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community engagement is increasingly seen as crucial to achieving high quality, efficient and collaborative care. However, organisations are still searching for the best and most effective ways to engage citizens in the shaping of health and care services. This review highlights the barriers and enablers for engaging communities in the planning, designing, governing, and/or delivering of health and care services on the macro or meso level. It provides policymakers and professionals with evidence-based guiding principles to implement their own effective community engagement (CE) strategies. METHODS: A Rapid Realist Review was conducted to investigate how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the effectiveness of CE. A local reference panel, consisting of health and care professionals and experts, assisted in the development of the research questions and search strategy. The panel’s input helped to refine the review’s findings. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted. RESULTS: Eight action-oriented guiding principles were identified: Ensure staff provide supportive and facilitative leadership to citizens based on transparency; foster a safe and trusting environment enabling citizens to provide input; ensure citizens’ early involvement; share decision-making and governance control with citizens; acknowledge and address citizens’ experiences of power imbalances between citizens and professionals; invest in citizens who feel they lack the skills and confidence to engage; create quick and tangible wins; take into account both citizens’ and organisations’ motivations. CONCLUSIONS: An especially important thread throughout the CE literature is the influence of power imbalances and organisations’ willingness, or not, to address such imbalances. The literature suggests that ‘meaningful participation’ of citizens can only be achieved if organisational processes are adapted to ensure that they are inclusive, accessible and supportive of citizens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5899371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58993712018-04-20 Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review De Weger, E. Van Vooren, N. Luijkx, K. G. Baan, C. A. Drewes, H. W. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Community engagement is increasingly seen as crucial to achieving high quality, efficient and collaborative care. However, organisations are still searching for the best and most effective ways to engage citizens in the shaping of health and care services. This review highlights the barriers and enablers for engaging communities in the planning, designing, governing, and/or delivering of health and care services on the macro or meso level. It provides policymakers and professionals with evidence-based guiding principles to implement their own effective community engagement (CE) strategies. METHODS: A Rapid Realist Review was conducted to investigate how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the effectiveness of CE. A local reference panel, consisting of health and care professionals and experts, assisted in the development of the research questions and search strategy. The panel’s input helped to refine the review’s findings. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted. RESULTS: Eight action-oriented guiding principles were identified: Ensure staff provide supportive and facilitative leadership to citizens based on transparency; foster a safe and trusting environment enabling citizens to provide input; ensure citizens’ early involvement; share decision-making and governance control with citizens; acknowledge and address citizens’ experiences of power imbalances between citizens and professionals; invest in citizens who feel they lack the skills and confidence to engage; create quick and tangible wins; take into account both citizens’ and organisations’ motivations. CONCLUSIONS: An especially important thread throughout the CE literature is the influence of power imbalances and organisations’ willingness, or not, to address such imbalances. The literature suggests that ‘meaningful participation’ of citizens can only be achieved if organisational processes are adapted to ensure that they are inclusive, accessible and supportive of citizens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5899371/ /pubmed/29653537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Weger, E.
Van Vooren, N.
Luijkx, K. G.
Baan, C. A.
Drewes, H. W.
Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title_full Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title_fullStr Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title_full_unstemmed Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title_short Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
title_sort achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dewegere achievingsuccessfulcommunityengagementarapidrealistreview
AT vanvoorenn achievingsuccessfulcommunityengagementarapidrealistreview
AT luijkxkg achievingsuccessfulcommunityengagementarapidrealistreview
AT baanca achievingsuccessfulcommunityengagementarapidrealistreview
AT dreweshw achievingsuccessfulcommunityengagementarapidrealistreview