Cargando…
Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to assess agreement between four rating systems of cosmetic outcome measured in a subset of patients with early breast cancer participating in the randomised TARGIT-A trial. TARGIT-A compared risk-adapted single-dose intra-operative radiotherapy (TARGIT-I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0998-x |
_version_ | 1783314267775172608 |
---|---|
author | Corica, Tammy Nowak, Anna K. Saunders, Christobel M. Bulsara, Max K. Taylor, Mandy Williams, Norman R. Keshtgar, Mohammed Joseph, David J. Vaidya, Jayant S. |
author_facet | Corica, Tammy Nowak, Anna K. Saunders, Christobel M. Bulsara, Max K. Taylor, Mandy Williams, Norman R. Keshtgar, Mohammed Joseph, David J. Vaidya, Jayant S. |
author_sort | Corica, Tammy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to assess agreement between four rating systems of cosmetic outcome measured in a subset of patients with early breast cancer participating in the randomised TARGIT-A trial. TARGIT-A compared risk-adapted single-dose intra-operative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) to whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: Patients, their Radiation Oncologist and Research Nurse completed a subjective cosmetic assessment questionnaire before radiotherapy and annually thereafter for five years. Objective data previously calculated by the validated BCCT.core software which utilizes digital photographs to score symmetry, colour and scar was also used. Agreement was assessed by the Kappa statistic and longitudinal changes were assessed by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Overall, an Excellent-Good (EG) cosmetic result was scored more often than a Fair-Poor (FP) result for both treatment groups across all time points, with patients who received TARGIT-IORT scoring EG more often than those who received EBRT however this was statistically significant at Year 5 only. There was modest agreement between the four rating systems with the highest Kappa score being moderate agreement which was between nurse and doctor scores at Year 1 with Kappa = 0.46 (p < 0.001), 95% CI (0.24, 0.68). CONCLUSION: Despite similar overall findings between treatment groups and rating systems, the inter-rater agreement was only modest. This suggests that the four rating systems utilized may not necessarily be used interchangeably and it is arguable that for an outcome such as cosmetic appearance, the patient’s point of view is the most important. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TARGIT-A ISRCTN34086741, Registered 21 July 2004, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0998-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5899392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58993922018-04-23 Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial Corica, Tammy Nowak, Anna K. Saunders, Christobel M. Bulsara, Max K. Taylor, Mandy Williams, Norman R. Keshtgar, Mohammed Joseph, David J. Vaidya, Jayant S. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to assess agreement between four rating systems of cosmetic outcome measured in a subset of patients with early breast cancer participating in the randomised TARGIT-A trial. TARGIT-A compared risk-adapted single-dose intra-operative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) to whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: Patients, their Radiation Oncologist and Research Nurse completed a subjective cosmetic assessment questionnaire before radiotherapy and annually thereafter for five years. Objective data previously calculated by the validated BCCT.core software which utilizes digital photographs to score symmetry, colour and scar was also used. Agreement was assessed by the Kappa statistic and longitudinal changes were assessed by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Overall, an Excellent-Good (EG) cosmetic result was scored more often than a Fair-Poor (FP) result for both treatment groups across all time points, with patients who received TARGIT-IORT scoring EG more often than those who received EBRT however this was statistically significant at Year 5 only. There was modest agreement between the four rating systems with the highest Kappa score being moderate agreement which was between nurse and doctor scores at Year 1 with Kappa = 0.46 (p < 0.001), 95% CI (0.24, 0.68). CONCLUSION: Despite similar overall findings between treatment groups and rating systems, the inter-rater agreement was only modest. This suggests that the four rating systems utilized may not necessarily be used interchangeably and it is arguable that for an outcome such as cosmetic appearance, the patient’s point of view is the most important. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TARGIT-A ISRCTN34086741, Registered 21 July 2004, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-0998-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5899392/ /pubmed/29653541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0998-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Corica, Tammy Nowak, Anna K. Saunders, Christobel M. Bulsara, Max K. Taylor, Mandy Williams, Norman R. Keshtgar, Mohammed Joseph, David J. Vaidya, Jayant S. Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title | Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title_full | Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title_fullStr | Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title_short | Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial |
title_sort | cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and bcct.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the targit-a trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0998-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coricatammy cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT nowakannak cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT saunderschristobelm cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT bulsaramaxk cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT taylormandy cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT williamsnormanr cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT keshtgarmohammed cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT josephdavidj cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial AT vaidyajayants cosmeticoutcomeasratedbypatientsdoctorsnursesandbcctcoresoftwareassessedover5yearsinasubsetofpatientsinthetargitatrial |