Cargando…
Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670719 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395 |
_version_ | 1783314314899226624 |
---|---|
author | Montero-Miralles, Paloma Estévez-Luaña, Roberto DeGregorio-González, César Valencia-dePablo, Oliver Jaramillo, David E. Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael |
author_facet | Montero-Miralles, Paloma Estévez-Luaña, Roberto DeGregorio-González, César Valencia-dePablo, Oliver Jaramillo, David E. Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael |
author_sort | Montero-Miralles, Paloma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix® - Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact test and McNemar test. RESULTS: Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed statistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser. CONCLUSIONS: 17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. Key words:Laser, endodontics, Smear Layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5899815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58998152018-04-18 Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl Montero-Miralles, Paloma Estévez-Luaña, Roberto DeGregorio-González, César Valencia-dePablo, Oliver Jaramillo, David E. Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix® - Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact test and McNemar test. RESULTS: Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed statistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser. CONCLUSIONS: 17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. Key words:Laser, endodontics, Smear Layer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5899815/ /pubmed/29670719 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Montero-Miralles, Paloma Estévez-Luaña, Roberto DeGregorio-González, César Valencia-dePablo, Oliver Jaramillo, David E. Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination
of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title_full | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination
of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination
of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination
of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title_short | Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination
of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl |
title_sort | effectiveness of nd:yag laser on the elimination
of debris and smear layer. a comparative study with two
different irrigation solution: edta and qmix® in addition to naocl |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670719 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monteromirallespaloma effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl AT estevezluanaroberto effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl AT degregoriogonzalezcesar effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl AT valenciadepablooliver effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl AT jaramillodavide effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl AT cisneroscabellorafael effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl |