Cargando…

Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero-Miralles, Paloma, Estévez-Luaña, Roberto, DeGregorio-González, César, Valencia-dePablo, Oliver, Jaramillo, David E., Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670719
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395
_version_ 1783314314899226624
author Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Estévez-Luaña, Roberto
DeGregorio-González, César
Valencia-dePablo, Oliver
Jaramillo, David E.
Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael
author_facet Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Estévez-Luaña, Roberto
DeGregorio-González, César
Valencia-dePablo, Oliver
Jaramillo, David E.
Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael
author_sort Montero-Miralles, Paloma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix® - Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact test and McNemar test. RESULTS: Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed statistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser. CONCLUSIONS: 17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. Key words:Laser, endodontics, Smear Layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5899815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58998152018-04-18 Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl Montero-Miralles, Paloma Estévez-Luaña, Roberto DeGregorio-González, César Valencia-dePablo, Oliver Jaramillo, David E. Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix® - Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact test and McNemar test. RESULTS: Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed statistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser. CONCLUSIONS: 17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. Key words:Laser, endodontics, Smear Layer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5899815/ /pubmed/29670719 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Montero-Miralles, Paloma
Estévez-Luaña, Roberto
DeGregorio-González, César
Valencia-dePablo, Oliver
Jaramillo, David E.
Cisneros-Cabello, Rafael
Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title_full Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title_short Effectiveness of Nd:YAG Laser on the elimination of debris and Smear Layer. A comparative study with two different irrigation solution: EDTA and QMix® in addition to NaOCl
title_sort effectiveness of nd:yag laser on the elimination of debris and smear layer. a comparative study with two different irrigation solution: edta and qmix® in addition to naocl
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670719
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54395
work_keys_str_mv AT monteromirallespaloma effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl
AT estevezluanaroberto effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl
AT degregoriogonzalezcesar effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl
AT valenciadepablooliver effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl
AT jaramillodavide effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl
AT cisneroscabellorafael effectivenessofndyaglaserontheeliminationofdebrisandsmearlayeracomparativestudywithtwodifferentirrigationsolutionedtaandqmixinadditiontonaocl