Cargando…

Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three mandibular full-arch superstructures on the peri-implant bone stress distribution during mandibular flexure caused by mid-opening (27 mm) and protrusion mandibular movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Fernandez, Elena, Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio, deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector, Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario Andres, Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza, Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8241313
_version_ 1783314321271422976
author Martin-Fernandez, Elena
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario Andres
Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
author_facet Martin-Fernandez, Elena
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario Andres
Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
author_sort Martin-Fernandez, Elena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three mandibular full-arch superstructures on the peri-implant bone stress distribution during mandibular flexure caused by mid-opening (27 mm) and protrusion mandibular movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional finite element models were created simulating six osseointegrated implants in the jawbone. One model simulated a 1-piece framework and the other simulated 2-piece and 3-piece frameworks. Muscle forces with definite direction and magnitude were exerted over areas of attachment to simulate multiple force vectors of masticatory muscles during mandibular protrusion and opening. RESULTS: During the movement of 27.5 mm jaw opening, the 1-piece and 3-piece superstructures showed the lowest values of bone stress around the mesial implants, gradually increasing towards the distal position. During the protrusion movement, bone stress increased compared to opening for any implant situation and for a divided or undivided framework. The 3-piece framework showed the highest values of peri-implant bone stress, regardless of the implant situation. CONCLUSIONS: The undivided framework provides the best biomechanical environment during mandibular protrusion and opening. Protrusion movement increases the peri-implant bone stress. The most mesial implants have the lowest biomechanical risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5899843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58998432018-05-27 Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis Martin-Fernandez, Elena Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario Andres Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza Alvarez-Arenal, Angel Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three mandibular full-arch superstructures on the peri-implant bone stress distribution during mandibular flexure caused by mid-opening (27 mm) and protrusion mandibular movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional finite element models were created simulating six osseointegrated implants in the jawbone. One model simulated a 1-piece framework and the other simulated 2-piece and 3-piece frameworks. Muscle forces with definite direction and magnitude were exerted over areas of attachment to simulate multiple force vectors of masticatory muscles during mandibular protrusion and opening. RESULTS: During the movement of 27.5 mm jaw opening, the 1-piece and 3-piece superstructures showed the lowest values of bone stress around the mesial implants, gradually increasing towards the distal position. During the protrusion movement, bone stress increased compared to opening for any implant situation and for a divided or undivided framework. The 3-piece framework showed the highest values of peri-implant bone stress, regardless of the implant situation. CONCLUSIONS: The undivided framework provides the best biomechanical environment during mandibular protrusion and opening. Protrusion movement increases the peri-implant bone stress. The most mesial implants have the lowest biomechanical risk. Hindawi 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5899843/ /pubmed/29805978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8241313 Text en Copyright © 2018 Elena Martin-Fernandez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin-Fernandez, Elena
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario Andres
Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title_full Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title_short Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
title_sort mandibular flexure and peri-implant bone stress distribution on an implant-supported fixed full-arch mandibular prosthesis: 3d finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8241313
work_keys_str_mv AT martinfernandezelena mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT gonzalezgonzalezignacio mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT dellanoslanchareshector mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT mauvezinquevedomarioandres mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT brizuelavelascoaritza mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT alvarezarenalangel mandibularflexureandperiimplantbonestressdistributiononanimplantsupportedfixedfullarchmandibularprosthesis3dfiniteelementanalysis