Cargando…
GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was high...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381 |
_version_ | 1783314327798808576 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Jin Dong, Wenzhu Ma, Yifeng Liang, Qian Shang, Yuanyuan Wang, Fen Huang, Hairong Pang, Yu |
author_facet | Shi, Jin Dong, Wenzhu Ma, Yifeng Liang, Qian Shang, Yuanyuan Wang, Fen Huang, Hairong Pang, Yu |
author_sort | Shi, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was higher than that of mycobacterial culture in our laboratory. We therefore carried out a prospective study to determine a potential explanation for this unexpected result regarding the clinical use of Xpert. Overall, a total of 558 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled in final analysis between August 2017 and September 2017 in Beijing Chest Hospital. The overall positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was 45.9% (256/558), which was significantly higher than that of liquid culture (33.4%, 184/558; P < 0.01). The percentage of culture negative result in salivary sputum was significantly higher than that in mucoid sputum [odds ratio (OR): 5.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.74–9.28; P < 0.01]. In addition, the TB cases having previous treatment history had a higher proportion of culture negative result than new cases (OR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.61–11.28; P = 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that Xpert outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting MTB from salivary sputum. In addition, the previously treated patients are more likely to yield negative culture results. Our data will provide important hints to formulate an appropriate diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis based on the appearance of sputum samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5899871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58998712018-05-27 GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum Shi, Jin Dong, Wenzhu Ma, Yifeng Liang, Qian Shang, Yuanyuan Wang, Fen Huang, Hairong Pang, Yu Biomed Res Int Research Article GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was higher than that of mycobacterial culture in our laboratory. We therefore carried out a prospective study to determine a potential explanation for this unexpected result regarding the clinical use of Xpert. Overall, a total of 558 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled in final analysis between August 2017 and September 2017 in Beijing Chest Hospital. The overall positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was 45.9% (256/558), which was significantly higher than that of liquid culture (33.4%, 184/558; P < 0.01). The percentage of culture negative result in salivary sputum was significantly higher than that in mucoid sputum [odds ratio (OR): 5.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.74–9.28; P < 0.01]. In addition, the TB cases having previous treatment history had a higher proportion of culture negative result than new cases (OR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.61–11.28; P = 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that Xpert outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting MTB from salivary sputum. In addition, the previously treated patients are more likely to yield negative culture results. Our data will provide important hints to formulate an appropriate diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis based on the appearance of sputum samples. Hindawi 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5899871/ /pubmed/29805972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jin Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Jin Dong, Wenzhu Ma, Yifeng Liang, Qian Shang, Yuanyuan Wang, Fen Huang, Hairong Pang, Yu GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title | GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title_full | GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title_fullStr | GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title_full_unstemmed | GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title_short | GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum |
title_sort | genexpert mtb/rif outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting mycobacterium tuberculosis from salivary sputum |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shijin genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT dongwenzhu genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT mayifeng genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT liangqian genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT shangyuanyuan genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT wangfen genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT huanghairong genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum AT pangyu genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum |