Cargando…

GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum

GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Jin, Dong, Wenzhu, Ma, Yifeng, Liang, Qian, Shang, Yuanyuan, Wang, Fen, Huang, Hairong, Pang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381
_version_ 1783314327798808576
author Shi, Jin
Dong, Wenzhu
Ma, Yifeng
Liang, Qian
Shang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Fen
Huang, Hairong
Pang, Yu
author_facet Shi, Jin
Dong, Wenzhu
Ma, Yifeng
Liang, Qian
Shang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Fen
Huang, Hairong
Pang, Yu
author_sort Shi, Jin
collection PubMed
description GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was higher than that of mycobacterial culture in our laboratory. We therefore carried out a prospective study to determine a potential explanation for this unexpected result regarding the clinical use of Xpert. Overall, a total of 558 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled in final analysis between August 2017 and September 2017 in Beijing Chest Hospital. The overall positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was 45.9% (256/558), which was significantly higher than that of liquid culture (33.4%, 184/558; P < 0.01). The percentage of culture negative result in salivary sputum was significantly higher than that in mucoid sputum [odds ratio (OR): 5.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.74–9.28; P < 0.01]. In addition, the TB cases having previous treatment history had a higher proportion of culture negative result than new cases (OR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.61–11.28; P = 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that Xpert outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting MTB from salivary sputum. In addition, the previously treated patients are more likely to yield negative culture results. Our data will provide important hints to formulate an appropriate diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis based on the appearance of sputum samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5899871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58998712018-05-27 GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum Shi, Jin Dong, Wenzhu Ma, Yifeng Liang, Qian Shang, Yuanyuan Wang, Fen Huang, Hairong Pang, Yu Biomed Res Int Research Article GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay has been endorsed for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity for culture positive TB. There is no doubt that Xpert could not be more sensitive than mycobacterial culture, while the positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was higher than that of mycobacterial culture in our laboratory. We therefore carried out a prospective study to determine a potential explanation for this unexpected result regarding the clinical use of Xpert. Overall, a total of 558 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled in final analysis between August 2017 and September 2017 in Beijing Chest Hospital. The overall positive rate of Xpert among sputum samples was 45.9% (256/558), which was significantly higher than that of liquid culture (33.4%, 184/558; P < 0.01). The percentage of culture negative result in salivary sputum was significantly higher than that in mucoid sputum [odds ratio (OR): 5.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.74–9.28; P < 0.01]. In addition, the TB cases having previous treatment history had a higher proportion of culture negative result than new cases (OR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.61–11.28; P = 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that Xpert outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting MTB from salivary sputum. In addition, the previously treated patients are more likely to yield negative culture results. Our data will provide important hints to formulate an appropriate diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis based on the appearance of sputum samples. Hindawi 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5899871/ /pubmed/29805972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jin Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Jin
Dong, Wenzhu
Ma, Yifeng
Liang, Qian
Shang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Fen
Huang, Hairong
Pang, Yu
GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title_full GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title_fullStr GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title_full_unstemmed GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title_short GeneXpert MTB/RIF Outperforms Mycobacterial Culture in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Salivary Sputum
title_sort genexpert mtb/rif outperforms mycobacterial culture in detecting mycobacterium tuberculosis from salivary sputum
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1514381
work_keys_str_mv AT shijin genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT dongwenzhu genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT mayifeng genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT liangqian genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT shangyuanyuan genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT wangfen genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT huanghairong genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum
AT pangyu genexpertmtbrifoutperformsmycobacterialcultureindetectingmycobacteriumtuberculosisfromsalivarysputum