Cargando…
Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to infl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666750 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564 |
_version_ | 1783314330558660608 |
---|---|
author | Lamb, Clayton T. Gilbert, Sophie L. Ford, Adam T. |
author_facet | Lamb, Clayton T. Gilbert, Sophie L. Ford, Adam T. |
author_sort | Lamb, Clayton T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to influence or predict traditional metrics of scholarship, such as citation rates. Here, we measure the association between citation rates and the Altmetric Attention Score—an indicator of the amount and reach of the attention an article has received—along with other forms of bibliometric performance (year published, journal impact factor, and article type). We found that Attention Score was positively correlated with citation rates. However, in recent years, we detected increasing media exposure did not relate to the equivalent citations as in earlier years; signalling a diminishing return on investment. Citations correlated with journal impact factors up to ∼13, but then plateaued, demonstrating that maximizing citations does not require publishing in the highest-impact journals. We conclude that ecology and conservation researchers can increase exposure of their research through social media engagement and, simultaneously, enhance their performance under traditional measures of scholarly activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5899883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58998832018-04-17 Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation Lamb, Clayton T. Gilbert, Sophie L. Ford, Adam T. PeerJ Conservation Biology Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to influence or predict traditional metrics of scholarship, such as citation rates. Here, we measure the association between citation rates and the Altmetric Attention Score—an indicator of the amount and reach of the attention an article has received—along with other forms of bibliometric performance (year published, journal impact factor, and article type). We found that Attention Score was positively correlated with citation rates. However, in recent years, we detected increasing media exposure did not relate to the equivalent citations as in earlier years; signalling a diminishing return on investment. Citations correlated with journal impact factors up to ∼13, but then plateaued, demonstrating that maximizing citations does not require publishing in the highest-impact journals. We conclude that ecology and conservation researchers can increase exposure of their research through social media engagement and, simultaneously, enhance their performance under traditional measures of scholarly activity. PeerJ Inc. 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5899883/ /pubmed/29666750 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564 Text en ©2018 Lamb et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Conservation Biology Lamb, Clayton T. Gilbert, Sophie L. Ford, Adam T. Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title | Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title_full | Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title_fullStr | Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title_short | Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation |
title_sort | tweet success? scientific communication correlates with increased citations in ecology and conservation |
topic | Conservation Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666750 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambclaytont tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation AT gilbertsophiel tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation AT fordadamt tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation |