Cargando…

Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation

Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to infl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamb, Clayton T., Gilbert, Sophie L., Ford, Adam T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666750
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564
_version_ 1783314330558660608
author Lamb, Clayton T.
Gilbert, Sophie L.
Ford, Adam T.
author_facet Lamb, Clayton T.
Gilbert, Sophie L.
Ford, Adam T.
author_sort Lamb, Clayton T.
collection PubMed
description Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to influence or predict traditional metrics of scholarship, such as citation rates. Here, we measure the association between citation rates and the Altmetric Attention Score—an indicator of the amount and reach of the attention an article has received—along with other forms of bibliometric performance (year published, journal impact factor, and article type). We found that Attention Score was positively correlated with citation rates. However, in recent years, we detected increasing media exposure did not relate to the equivalent citations as in earlier years; signalling a diminishing return on investment. Citations correlated with journal impact factors up to ∼13, but then plateaued, demonstrating that maximizing citations does not require publishing in the highest-impact journals. We conclude that ecology and conservation researchers can increase exposure of their research through social media engagement and, simultaneously, enhance their performance under traditional measures of scholarly activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5899883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58998832018-04-17 Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation Lamb, Clayton T. Gilbert, Sophie L. Ford, Adam T. PeerJ Conservation Biology Science communication is seen as critical for the disciplines of ecology and conservation, where research products are often used to shape policy and decision making. Scientists are increasing their online media communication, via social media and news. Such media engagement has been thought to influence or predict traditional metrics of scholarship, such as citation rates. Here, we measure the association between citation rates and the Altmetric Attention Score—an indicator of the amount and reach of the attention an article has received—along with other forms of bibliometric performance (year published, journal impact factor, and article type). We found that Attention Score was positively correlated with citation rates. However, in recent years, we detected increasing media exposure did not relate to the equivalent citations as in earlier years; signalling a diminishing return on investment. Citations correlated with journal impact factors up to ∼13, but then plateaued, demonstrating that maximizing citations does not require publishing in the highest-impact journals. We conclude that ecology and conservation researchers can increase exposure of their research through social media engagement and, simultaneously, enhance their performance under traditional measures of scholarly activity. PeerJ Inc. 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5899883/ /pubmed/29666750 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564 Text en ©2018 Lamb et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Lamb, Clayton T.
Gilbert, Sophie L.
Ford, Adam T.
Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title_full Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title_fullStr Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title_short Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
title_sort tweet success? scientific communication correlates with increased citations in ecology and conservation
topic Conservation Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5899883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666750
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4564
work_keys_str_mv AT lambclaytont tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation
AT gilbertsophiel tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation
AT fordadamt tweetsuccessscientificcommunicationcorrelateswithincreasedcitationsinecologyandconservation