Cargando…

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training

Background: Cerebellar activity can be modulated using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) and, when applied concurrently with task training, has been shown to facilitate cognitive and motor performance. However, how ctDCS facilitates motor performance is not fully understood....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Summers, Rebekah L. S., Chen, Mo, Hatch, Andrea, Kimberley, Teresa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00118
_version_ 1783314339663446016
author Summers, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Hatch, Andrea
Kimberley, Teresa J.
author_facet Summers, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Hatch, Andrea
Kimberley, Teresa J.
author_sort Summers, Rebekah L. S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Cerebellar activity can be modulated using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) and, when applied concurrently with task training, has been shown to facilitate cognitive and motor performance. However, how ctDCS facilitates motor performance is not fully understood. Objective/Hypothesis: To assess the electrophysiological and motor performance effects of ctDCS applied during motor training. Methods: Fourteen healthy adults (age 28.8 ± 10.5 years) were randomly assigned to complete one session of finger tracking training with either simultaneous bilateral anodal or sham ctDCS. Training was completed in two 15 min epochs with a 5-min break (total 30 min stimulation, 2 mA). Tracking accuracy and corticospinal and intracortical excitability were measured immediately before and after the training period. Motor cortical excitability measures included resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, cortical silent period (CSP) and short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Results: There was a significant interaction of Group * Time for MEP amplitude and CSP duration (p < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed MEP amplitude was increased in the sham group (p < 0.01), indicating increased corticospinal excitability from baseline while the anodal group displayed a decrease in MEP amplitude (p = 0.023) and prolongation of CSP duration (p < 0.01). SICI and RMT remained unchanged following ctDCS and training. Task accuracy was improved in both groups at post-test with a significant effect of Time (p < 0.01); however, there was no effect of Group (p = 0.45) or interaction of Group * Time (p = 0.83). During training, there was a significant effect of Block (p < 0.01) but no significant effect of Group or interaction effect (p > 0.06). Conclusions: ctDCS applied during task training is capable of modulating or interfering with practice-related changes in corticospinal excitability without disrupting performance improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5900002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59000022018-04-23 Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training Summers, Rebekah L. S. Chen, Mo Hatch, Andrea Kimberley, Teresa J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Cerebellar activity can be modulated using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) and, when applied concurrently with task training, has been shown to facilitate cognitive and motor performance. However, how ctDCS facilitates motor performance is not fully understood. Objective/Hypothesis: To assess the electrophysiological and motor performance effects of ctDCS applied during motor training. Methods: Fourteen healthy adults (age 28.8 ± 10.5 years) were randomly assigned to complete one session of finger tracking training with either simultaneous bilateral anodal or sham ctDCS. Training was completed in two 15 min epochs with a 5-min break (total 30 min stimulation, 2 mA). Tracking accuracy and corticospinal and intracortical excitability were measured immediately before and after the training period. Motor cortical excitability measures included resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, cortical silent period (CSP) and short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Results: There was a significant interaction of Group * Time for MEP amplitude and CSP duration (p < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed MEP amplitude was increased in the sham group (p < 0.01), indicating increased corticospinal excitability from baseline while the anodal group displayed a decrease in MEP amplitude (p = 0.023) and prolongation of CSP duration (p < 0.01). SICI and RMT remained unchanged following ctDCS and training. Task accuracy was improved in both groups at post-test with a significant effect of Time (p < 0.01); however, there was no effect of Group (p = 0.45) or interaction of Group * Time (p = 0.83). During training, there was a significant effect of Block (p < 0.01) but no significant effect of Group or interaction effect (p > 0.06). Conclusions: ctDCS applied during task training is capable of modulating or interfering with practice-related changes in corticospinal excitability without disrupting performance improvement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5900002/ /pubmed/29686609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00118 Text en Copyright © 2018 Summers, Chen, Hatch and Kimberley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Summers, Rebekah L. S.
Chen, Mo
Hatch, Andrea
Kimberley, Teresa J.
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title_full Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title_fullStr Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title_short Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
title_sort cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability during motor training
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00118
work_keys_str_mv AT summersrebekahls cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringmotortraining
AT chenmo cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringmotortraining
AT hatchandrea cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringmotortraining
AT kimberleyteresaj cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringmotortraining