Cargando…

Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung-Wan, Chung, Young-Chul, Kang, Young-Shin, Kim, Jae-Kyeong, Jang, Ji-Eun, Jhon, Min, Lee, Ju-Yeon, Kim, Jae-Min, Shin, Il-Seon, Yoon, Jin-Sang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475231
http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24
_version_ 1783314403989389312
author Kim, Sung-Wan
Chung, Young-Chul
Kang, Young-Shin
Kim, Jae-Kyeong
Jang, Ji-Eun
Jhon, Min
Lee, Ju-Yeon
Kim, Jae-Min
Shin, Il-Seon
Yoon, Jin-Sang
author_facet Kim, Sung-Wan
Chung, Young-Chul
Kang, Young-Shin
Kim, Jae-Kyeong
Jang, Ji-Eun
Jhon, Min
Lee, Ju-Yeon
Kim, Jae-Min
Shin, Il-Seon
Yoon, Jin-Sang
author_sort Kim, Sung-Wan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5900395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59003952018-04-19 Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population Kim, Sung-Wan Chung, Young-Chul Kang, Young-Shin Kim, Jae-Kyeong Jang, Ji-Eun Jhon, Min Lee, Ju-Yeon Kim, Jae-Min Shin, Il-Seon Yoon, Jin-Sang Psychiatry Investig Original Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community. Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2018-02 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5900395/ /pubmed/29475231 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sung-Wan
Chung, Young-Chul
Kang, Young-Shin
Kim, Jae-Kyeong
Jang, Ji-Eun
Jhon, Min
Lee, Ju-Yeon
Kim, Jae-Min
Shin, Il-Seon
Yoon, Jin-Sang
Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title_full Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title_fullStr Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title_short Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
title_sort validation of the korean version of the 16-item prodromal questionnaire in a non-help-seeking college population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475231
http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungwan validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT chungyoungchul validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT kangyoungshin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT kimjaekyeong validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT jangjieun validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT jhonmin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT leejuyeon validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT kimjaemin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT shinilseon validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation
AT yoonjinsang validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation