Cargando…
Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population
OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475231 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24 |
_version_ | 1783314403989389312 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sung-Wan Chung, Young-Chul Kang, Young-Shin Kim, Jae-Kyeong Jang, Ji-Eun Jhon, Min Lee, Ju-Yeon Kim, Jae-Min Shin, Il-Seon Yoon, Jin-Sang |
author_facet | Kim, Sung-Wan Chung, Young-Chul Kang, Young-Shin Kim, Jae-Kyeong Jang, Ji-Eun Jhon, Min Lee, Ju-Yeon Kim, Jae-Min Shin, Il-Seon Yoon, Jin-Sang |
author_sort | Kim, Sung-Wan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5900395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Neuropsychiatric Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59003952018-04-19 Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population Kim, Sung-Wan Chung, Young-Chul Kang, Young-Shin Kim, Jae-Kyeong Jang, Ji-Eun Jhon, Min Lee, Ju-Yeon Kim, Jae-Min Shin, Il-Seon Yoon, Jin-Sang Psychiatry Investig Original Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. METHODS: Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community. Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2018-02 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5900395/ /pubmed/29475231 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Sung-Wan Chung, Young-Chul Kang, Young-Shin Kim, Jae-Kyeong Jang, Ji-Eun Jhon, Min Lee, Ju-Yeon Kim, Jae-Min Shin, Il-Seon Yoon, Jin-Sang Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title | Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title_full | Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title_short | Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population |
title_sort | validation of the korean version of the 16-item prodromal questionnaire in a non-help-seeking college population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475231 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.04.24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsungwan validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT chungyoungchul validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT kangyoungshin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT kimjaekyeong validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT jangjieun validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT jhonmin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT leejuyeon validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT kimjaemin validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT shinilseon validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation AT yoonjinsang validationofthekoreanversionofthe16itemprodromalquestionnaireinanonhelpseekingcollegepopulation |