Cargando…
Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals
The comprehension of metaphors involves the ability to activate a broader, more flexible set of semantic associations in order to integrate the meanings of the weakly related parts of the metaphor into a meaningful linguistic expression. Previous findings point to a relation between levels of creati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00482 |
_version_ | 1783314411567448064 |
---|---|
author | Kenett, Yoed N. Gold, Rinat Faust, Miriam |
author_facet | Kenett, Yoed N. Gold, Rinat Faust, Miriam |
author_sort | Kenett, Yoed N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The comprehension of metaphors involves the ability to activate a broader, more flexible set of semantic associations in order to integrate the meanings of the weakly related parts of the metaphor into a meaningful linguistic expression. Previous findings point to a relation between levels of creativity and efficiency in processing metaphoric expressions, as measured by reaction times (RTs) and error rates. Furthermore, recent studies have found that more creative individuals exhibit a relatively more flexible semantic memory structure compared to less creative individuals, which may facilitate their comprehension of novel metaphors. In the present study, lower and higher creative individuals performed a semantic relatedness judgment task on word pairs. These word pairs comprised four types of semantic relations: novel metaphors, conventional metaphors, literal word pairs, and meaningless word pairs. We hypothesized that the two groups will perform similarly in comprehending the literal, unrelated, and the conventional metaphoric word pairs. However, with respect to novel metaphors, we predicted that higher creative individuals will demonstrate better performance compared to lower creative individuals, as indicated by smaller RTs and more accurate responses. Our main finding shows that higher creative individuals were faster in comprehending both types of metaphors, conventional and novel, compared to lower creative individuals. Furthermore, higher creative individuals were significantly more accurate than lower creative individual only in comprehending novel metaphors. The findings are discussed in light of previous findings regarding the relation between metaphor comprehension, semantic memory, and creativity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5900434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59004342018-04-23 Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals Kenett, Yoed N. Gold, Rinat Faust, Miriam Front Psychol Psychology The comprehension of metaphors involves the ability to activate a broader, more flexible set of semantic associations in order to integrate the meanings of the weakly related parts of the metaphor into a meaningful linguistic expression. Previous findings point to a relation between levels of creativity and efficiency in processing metaphoric expressions, as measured by reaction times (RTs) and error rates. Furthermore, recent studies have found that more creative individuals exhibit a relatively more flexible semantic memory structure compared to less creative individuals, which may facilitate their comprehension of novel metaphors. In the present study, lower and higher creative individuals performed a semantic relatedness judgment task on word pairs. These word pairs comprised four types of semantic relations: novel metaphors, conventional metaphors, literal word pairs, and meaningless word pairs. We hypothesized that the two groups will perform similarly in comprehending the literal, unrelated, and the conventional metaphoric word pairs. However, with respect to novel metaphors, we predicted that higher creative individuals will demonstrate better performance compared to lower creative individuals, as indicated by smaller RTs and more accurate responses. Our main finding shows that higher creative individuals were faster in comprehending both types of metaphors, conventional and novel, compared to lower creative individuals. Furthermore, higher creative individuals were significantly more accurate than lower creative individual only in comprehending novel metaphors. The findings are discussed in light of previous findings regarding the relation between metaphor comprehension, semantic memory, and creativity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5900434/ /pubmed/29686639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00482 Text en Copyright © 2018 Kenett, Gold and Faust. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Kenett, Yoed N. Gold, Rinat Faust, Miriam Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title | Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title_full | Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title_fullStr | Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title_full_unstemmed | Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title_short | Metaphor Comprehension in Low and High Creative Individuals |
title_sort | metaphor comprehension in low and high creative individuals |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kenettyoedn metaphorcomprehensioninlowandhighcreativeindividuals AT goldrinat metaphorcomprehensioninlowandhighcreativeindividuals AT faustmiriam metaphorcomprehensioninlowandhighcreativeindividuals |