Cargando…
Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days
Opportunity costs of bed‐days are fundamental to understanding the value of healthcare systems. They greatly influence burden of disease estimations and economic evaluations involving stays in healthcare facilities. However, different estimation techniques employ assumptions that differ crucially in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3613 |
_version_ | 1783314476192235520 |
---|---|
author | Sandmann, Frank G. Robotham, Julie V. Deeny, Sarah R. Edmunds, W. John Jit, Mark |
author_facet | Sandmann, Frank G. Robotham, Julie V. Deeny, Sarah R. Edmunds, W. John Jit, Mark |
author_sort | Sandmann, Frank G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Opportunity costs of bed‐days are fundamental to understanding the value of healthcare systems. They greatly influence burden of disease estimations and economic evaluations involving stays in healthcare facilities. However, different estimation techniques employ assumptions that differ crucially in whether to consider the value of the second‐best alternative use forgone, of any available alternative use, or the value of the actually chosen alternative. Informed by economic theory, this paper provides a taxonomic framework of methodologies for estimating the opportunity costs of resources. This taxonomy is then applied to bed‐days by classifying existing approaches accordingly. We highlight differences in valuation between approaches and the perspective adopted, and we use our framework to appraise the assumptions and biases underlying the standard approaches that have been widely adopted mostly unquestioned in the past, such as the conventional use of reference costs and administrative accounting data. Drawing on these findings, we present a novel approach for estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days in terms of health forgone for the second‐best patient, but expressed monetarily. This alternative approach effectively re‐connects to the concept of choice and explicitly considers net benefits. It is broadly applicable across settings and for other resources besides bed‐days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5900745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59007452018-04-23 Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days Sandmann, Frank G. Robotham, Julie V. Deeny, Sarah R. Edmunds, W. John Jit, Mark Health Econ Research Articles Opportunity costs of bed‐days are fundamental to understanding the value of healthcare systems. They greatly influence burden of disease estimations and economic evaluations involving stays in healthcare facilities. However, different estimation techniques employ assumptions that differ crucially in whether to consider the value of the second‐best alternative use forgone, of any available alternative use, or the value of the actually chosen alternative. Informed by economic theory, this paper provides a taxonomic framework of methodologies for estimating the opportunity costs of resources. This taxonomy is then applied to bed‐days by classifying existing approaches accordingly. We highlight differences in valuation between approaches and the perspective adopted, and we use our framework to appraise the assumptions and biases underlying the standard approaches that have been widely adopted mostly unquestioned in the past, such as the conventional use of reference costs and administrative accounting data. Drawing on these findings, we present a novel approach for estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days in terms of health forgone for the second‐best patient, but expressed monetarily. This alternative approach effectively re‐connects to the concept of choice and explicitly considers net benefits. It is broadly applicable across settings and for other resources besides bed‐days. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-06 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5900745/ /pubmed/29105894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3613 Text en © 2017 The Authors Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Sandmann, Frank G. Robotham, Julie V. Deeny, Sarah R. Edmunds, W. John Jit, Mark Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title | Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title_full | Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title_fullStr | Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title_short | Estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
title_sort | estimating the opportunity costs of bed‐days |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandmannfrankg estimatingtheopportunitycostsofbeddays AT robothamjuliev estimatingtheopportunitycostsofbeddays AT deenysarahr estimatingtheopportunitycostsofbeddays AT edmundswjohn estimatingtheopportunitycostsofbeddays AT jitmark estimatingtheopportunitycostsofbeddays |