Cargando…

Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences

Personalising aftercare for curatively treated breast cancer patients is expected to improve patient satisfaction with care. A patient decision aid can support women in making decisions about their aftercare trajectory, but is currently not available. The aim of this study was to assess the needs of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaassen, Linda, Dirksen, Carmen, Boersma, Liesbeth, Hoving, Ciska
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12730
_version_ 1783314496347963392
author Klaassen, Linda
Dirksen, Carmen
Boersma, Liesbeth
Hoving, Ciska
author_facet Klaassen, Linda
Dirksen, Carmen
Boersma, Liesbeth
Hoving, Ciska
author_sort Klaassen, Linda
collection PubMed
description Personalising aftercare for curatively treated breast cancer patients is expected to improve patient satisfaction with care. A patient decision aid can support women in making decisions about their aftercare trajectory, but is currently not available. The aim of this study was to assess the needs of patients and health professionals with regard to an aftercare decision aid to systematically develop such a decision aid. Focus groups with patients and individual interviews with health professionals were digitally recorded and coded using the Framework analysis. Although most patients felt few aftercare options were available to them, health professionals reported to provide various options on the patients' request. Patients reported difficulty in expressing their need for options to their health professional. Although most patients were unfamiliar with decision aids, the majority preferred a paper‐based patient decision aid, while most health professionals preferred an online tool. The practical implications for the intended patient decision aid are: that a digital tool with paper‐based element should be developed, the patient decision aid should facilitate both rational and intuitive processes and should provide insight in patients' preferences concerning aftercare to discuss these explicitly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5900871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59008712018-04-23 Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences Klaassen, Linda Dirksen, Carmen Boersma, Liesbeth Hoving, Ciska Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles Personalising aftercare for curatively treated breast cancer patients is expected to improve patient satisfaction with care. A patient decision aid can support women in making decisions about their aftercare trajectory, but is currently not available. The aim of this study was to assess the needs of patients and health professionals with regard to an aftercare decision aid to systematically develop such a decision aid. Focus groups with patients and individual interviews with health professionals were digitally recorded and coded using the Framework analysis. Although most patients felt few aftercare options were available to them, health professionals reported to provide various options on the patients' request. Patients reported difficulty in expressing their need for options to their health professional. Although most patients were unfamiliar with decision aids, the majority preferred a paper‐based patient decision aid, while most health professionals preferred an online tool. The practical implications for the intended patient decision aid are: that a digital tool with paper‐based element should be developed, the patient decision aid should facilitate both rational and intuitive processes and should provide insight in patients' preferences concerning aftercare to discuss these explicitly. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-20 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5900871/ /pubmed/28727259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12730 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Klaassen, Linda
Dirksen, Carmen
Boersma, Liesbeth
Hoving, Ciska
Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title_full Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title_fullStr Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title_full_unstemmed Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title_short Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
title_sort developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28727259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12730
work_keys_str_mv AT klaassenlinda developinganaftercaredecisionaidassessinghealthprofessionalsandpatientspreferences
AT dirksencarmen developinganaftercaredecisionaidassessinghealthprofessionalsandpatientspreferences
AT boersmaliesbeth developinganaftercaredecisionaidassessinghealthprofessionalsandpatientspreferences
AT hovingciska developinganaftercaredecisionaidassessinghealthprofessionalsandpatientspreferences
AT developinganaftercaredecisionaidassessinghealthprofessionalsandpatientspreferences