Cargando…

Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate a range of possible predictors of nocebo responses to medicines. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: In total, 203 healthy adult volunteers completed measures concerning demographics, psychological factors, medicine‐related beliefs, baseline symptoms, and symptom ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Rebecca K., Weinman, John, Rubin, G. James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12298
_version_ 1783314498254274560
author Webster, Rebecca K.
Weinman, John
Rubin, G. James
author_facet Webster, Rebecca K.
Weinman, John
Rubin, G. James
author_sort Webster, Rebecca K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate a range of possible predictors of nocebo responses to medicines. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: In total, 203 healthy adult volunteers completed measures concerning demographics, psychological factors, medicine‐related beliefs, baseline symptoms, and symptom expectations before taking a sham pill, described as ‘a well‐known tablet available without prescription’ that was known to be associated with several side effects. Associations between these measures and subsequent attribution of symptoms to the tablet were assessed using a hurdle model consisting of a joint logistic and truncated negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Men had an increased odds of attributing symptoms to the tablet OR = 1.52, and older participants had decreased odds, OR = 0.97. Medicine‐related beliefs were important, with modern health worries, belief that medicines cause harm and perceived sensitivity to medicines associated with increased odds of symptom attribution, OR = 1.02, 1.10, 1.09, respectively. Trust in medicines and pharmaceutical companies decreased the odds of symptom attribution, OR = 0.91, 0.88, respectively. The number of symptoms at baseline and the expected likelihood of symptoms were associated with an increased odds of attributing symptoms to the tablet, OR = 1.07, 1.06, respectively. Anxiety, previous symptom experience, symptom expectations, and modern health worries were also important in predicting the number of symptoms participants attributed to the tablet. CONCLUSION: It is hard to predict who is at risk of developing nocebo responses to medicines from demographic or personality characteristics. Context‐specific factors such as beliefs about and trust in medicines, current symptoms and symptom expectations are more useful as predictors. More work is needed to investigate this in a patient sample. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Many patients report non‐specific side effects to their medication which may arise through a nocebo effect. Whether some people are particularly predisposed to experience nocebo effects remains unclear. What does this study add? Demographic and personality characteristics are poor predictors of symptom attribution to a sham medicine. Instead, context‐specific factors that concern people's beliefs surrounding medicines, their current symptoms, and symptom expectations are more useful as predictors of symptom attribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5900880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59008802018-04-23 Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study Webster, Rebecca K. Weinman, John Rubin, G. James Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To investigate a range of possible predictors of nocebo responses to medicines. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: In total, 203 healthy adult volunteers completed measures concerning demographics, psychological factors, medicine‐related beliefs, baseline symptoms, and symptom expectations before taking a sham pill, described as ‘a well‐known tablet available without prescription’ that was known to be associated with several side effects. Associations between these measures and subsequent attribution of symptoms to the tablet were assessed using a hurdle model consisting of a joint logistic and truncated negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Men had an increased odds of attributing symptoms to the tablet OR = 1.52, and older participants had decreased odds, OR = 0.97. Medicine‐related beliefs were important, with modern health worries, belief that medicines cause harm and perceived sensitivity to medicines associated with increased odds of symptom attribution, OR = 1.02, 1.10, 1.09, respectively. Trust in medicines and pharmaceutical companies decreased the odds of symptom attribution, OR = 0.91, 0.88, respectively. The number of symptoms at baseline and the expected likelihood of symptoms were associated with an increased odds of attributing symptoms to the tablet, OR = 1.07, 1.06, respectively. Anxiety, previous symptom experience, symptom expectations, and modern health worries were also important in predicting the number of symptoms participants attributed to the tablet. CONCLUSION: It is hard to predict who is at risk of developing nocebo responses to medicines from demographic or personality characteristics. Context‐specific factors such as beliefs about and trust in medicines, current symptoms and symptom expectations are more useful as predictors. More work is needed to investigate this in a patient sample. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Many patients report non‐specific side effects to their medication which may arise through a nocebo effect. Whether some people are particularly predisposed to experience nocebo effects remains unclear. What does this study add? Demographic and personality characteristics are poor predictors of symptom attribution to a sham medicine. Instead, context‐specific factors that concern people's beliefs surrounding medicines, their current symptoms, and symptom expectations are more useful as predictors of symptom attribution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-05 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5900880/ /pubmed/29405507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12298 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Webster, Rebecca K.
Weinman, John
Rubin, G. James
Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title_full Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title_fullStr Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title_short Medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study
title_sort medicine‐related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: a prospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12298
work_keys_str_mv AT websterrebeccak medicinerelatedbeliefspredictattributionofsymptomstoashammedicineaprospectivestudy
AT weinmanjohn medicinerelatedbeliefspredictattributionofsymptomstoashammedicineaprospectivestudy
AT rubingjames medicinerelatedbeliefspredictattributionofsymptomstoashammedicineaprospectivestudy