Cargando…

Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer

Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn, J., Casey, C., Sandoe, D., Hyde, M.K., Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C., Lowe, A., Oliffe, J.L., Chambers, S.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644
_version_ 1783314510743863296
author Dunn, J.
Casey, C.
Sandoe, D.
Hyde, M.K.
Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C.
Lowe, A.
Oliffe, J.L.
Chambers, S.K.
author_facet Dunn, J.
Casey, C.
Sandoe, D.
Hyde, M.K.
Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C.
Lowe, A.
Oliffe, J.L.
Chambers, S.K.
author_sort Dunn, J.
collection PubMed
description Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also attended a focus group, about motivations, experiences, past and future challenges in founding and leading PCSGs. Thematic analysis identified four global themes: illness experience; enacting a supportive response; forming a national collective and challenges. Leaders described men's feelings of isolation and neglect by the health system as the impetus for PCSGs to form and give/receive mutual help. Negotiating health care systems was an early challenge. National affiliation enabled leaders to build a united voice in the health system and establish a group identity and collective voice. Affiliation was supported by a symbiotic relationship with tensions between independence, affiliation and governance. Future challenges were group sustainability and inclusiveness. Study findings describe how a grassroots PCSG movement arose consistent with an embodied health movement perspective. Health care organisations who seek to leverage these community resources need to be cognisant of SG values and purpose if they are to negotiate effective partnerships that maximise mutual benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5900936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59009362018-04-23 Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer Dunn, J. Casey, C. Sandoe, D. Hyde, M.K. Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C. Lowe, A. Oliffe, J.L. Chambers, S.K. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also attended a focus group, about motivations, experiences, past and future challenges in founding and leading PCSGs. Thematic analysis identified four global themes: illness experience; enacting a supportive response; forming a national collective and challenges. Leaders described men's feelings of isolation and neglect by the health system as the impetus for PCSGs to form and give/receive mutual help. Negotiating health care systems was an early challenge. National affiliation enabled leaders to build a united voice in the health system and establish a group identity and collective voice. Affiliation was supported by a symbiotic relationship with tensions between independence, affiliation and governance. Future challenges were group sustainability and inclusiveness. Study findings describe how a grassroots PCSG movement arose consistent with an embodied health movement perspective. Health care organisations who seek to leverage these community resources need to be cognisant of SG values and purpose if they are to negotiate effective partnerships that maximise mutual benefit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-01 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5900936/ /pubmed/28145020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dunn, J.
Casey, C.
Sandoe, D.
Hyde, M.K.
Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C.
Lowe, A.
Oliffe, J.L.
Chambers, S.K.
Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title_full Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title_fullStr Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title_short Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
title_sort advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnj advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT caseyc advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT sandoed advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT hydemk advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT cheronsauermc advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT lowea advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT oliffejl advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer
AT chamberssk advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer