Cargando…
Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer
Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644 |
_version_ | 1783314510743863296 |
---|---|
author | Dunn, J. Casey, C. Sandoe, D. Hyde, M.K. Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C. Lowe, A. Oliffe, J.L. Chambers, S.K. |
author_facet | Dunn, J. Casey, C. Sandoe, D. Hyde, M.K. Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C. Lowe, A. Oliffe, J.L. Chambers, S.K. |
author_sort | Dunn, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also attended a focus group, about motivations, experiences, past and future challenges in founding and leading PCSGs. Thematic analysis identified four global themes: illness experience; enacting a supportive response; forming a national collective and challenges. Leaders described men's feelings of isolation and neglect by the health system as the impetus for PCSGs to form and give/receive mutual help. Negotiating health care systems was an early challenge. National affiliation enabled leaders to build a united voice in the health system and establish a group identity and collective voice. Affiliation was supported by a symbiotic relationship with tensions between independence, affiliation and governance. Future challenges were group sustainability and inclusiveness. Study findings describe how a grassroots PCSG movement arose consistent with an embodied health movement perspective. Health care organisations who seek to leverage these community resources need to be cognisant of SG values and purpose if they are to negotiate effective partnerships that maximise mutual benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5900936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59009362018-04-23 Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer Dunn, J. Casey, C. Sandoe, D. Hyde, M.K. Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C. Lowe, A. Oliffe, J.L. Chambers, S.K. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also attended a focus group, about motivations, experiences, past and future challenges in founding and leading PCSGs. Thematic analysis identified four global themes: illness experience; enacting a supportive response; forming a national collective and challenges. Leaders described men's feelings of isolation and neglect by the health system as the impetus for PCSGs to form and give/receive mutual help. Negotiating health care systems was an early challenge. National affiliation enabled leaders to build a united voice in the health system and establish a group identity and collective voice. Affiliation was supported by a symbiotic relationship with tensions between independence, affiliation and governance. Future challenges were group sustainability and inclusiveness. Study findings describe how a grassroots PCSG movement arose consistent with an embodied health movement perspective. Health care organisations who seek to leverage these community resources need to be cognisant of SG values and purpose if they are to negotiate effective partnerships that maximise mutual benefit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-01 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5900936/ /pubmed/28145020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Dunn, J. Casey, C. Sandoe, D. Hyde, M.K. Cheron‐Sauer, M‐C. Lowe, A. Oliffe, J.L. Chambers, S.K. Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title | Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title_full | Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title_short | Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
title_sort | advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5900936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunnj advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT caseyc advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT sandoed advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT hydemk advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT cheronsauermc advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT lowea advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT oliffejl advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer AT chamberssk advocacysupportandsurvivorshipinprostatecancer |